Back

Operation U-Turn

By Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D.

Speech Given September 30, 2006 in Kansas City, Missouri

I'm here today to talk about the Kansas City, SmartPort.  But before I do that, I want to take you on a journey that will reveal to you just how the SmartPort arrived without your knowing much about it.  I will discuss how the Kansas City planners along with the complicity of your local, state and national news media was able to design, prepare and initiate the SmartPort concept.  How they conducted their enormous planning, design, innumerable meetings, signed agreements, mobilization and project development and moved forward with little or no resistance. 

How is it they were able to create and put in place the many component parts of the SmartPort without your knowing or comprehending the vastness of it?  A mega-project that could possibly impact to your environment, societal or economic security, not to mention the threat to your national sovereignty or any other negatives that might factor in.  The fact is that got where they are today because they were operating covertly, under the radar with minimal and mostly VERY POSITIVE information provided by the complicit media.  Their plan, of course, was to produce little or no resistance to their newly devised North American Union concept called an INLAND PORT.

Inland ports are a part of the federal government's overall plan which they euphemistically call the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America or SPP for short.  You will find that this massive project in your backyard is but one of hundreds of projects that the federal government's executive branch is spearheading through the  Department of Commerce.  They are working feverishly to move forward in many areas in order to create a fait acompli before you know what is actually going on. 

IN FACT the Kansas City SmartPort is a major SPP component that will help them leverage the creation of the North American Union or the NAU for short.  In order to achieve the North American Union projects like the Kansas City SmartPort was a results of the planning and agreements by the three heads of state from Mexico, Canada and the United States. 

Together, with many of their minions are working assiduously to erase America as you know it, all without Congressional oversight or informing or inquiring if We the People agree to its creation.  They claim the right to proceed is derived from the NAFTA trade agreement, which is completely untrue, and is EXACTLY the same methodology they used to suck the European countries into the creation of the European Union.  Lies and deception are their methodology.  Stealth and skullduggery are their actions.  Here is what the future will look like for Kansas City and the rest of the country if the SmartPort is allowed to proceed . . A corridor 4 football fields wide with six lanes for cars, 4 lanes for truck, two rail lines, one for freight and one for passengers plus an area for utilities such as gas, oil, telecommunications and electricity.

Note the smoggy haze surrounding these cars.  Multiply that by the fact that China will no longer ship to west coast ports and instead they will off-load at three ports on the lower west coast of Mexico and then HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of trucks will drive the length of Mexico and up the Trans-Texas Corridor called  TTC-35 and straight through the heart of Kansas City. 

You should also know that Mexican trucks were granted exemption from our emission laws by the Supreme Court.  In addition, investigative reporting by the Teamsters Union found that many, if not all, of the Mexican drivers partake of a variety of illegal drugs in order to drive the distances and hours they are forced to do by their company owners.  Are you outraged yet?

Ask yourself if you want to be living in the bull's-eye that essentially will initiate the destruction of America's sovereignty by allowing Mexico to plant its flag on American soil and claim it as sovereign Mexican land. 

What Does Sovereignty Mean to You?  In 1991 when globalism became a buzzword . . . "Mel Hurtig, founder of the Council of Canadians, recognized the uniqueness of independent countries in contrast to a globalized world . . . [when he said] 

The advantage of the nation-state is that it allows the people the freedom to determine their own future to the best of their ability. People of common values and inclinations [who] build traditions and develop a legal framework for the society they have evolved…for the preservation of their heritage, their culture, their moral standards, their ethics, and their customs. Different nations have different standards and values; and to the extent that democracy functions properly, these standards and values are reflected in the way the society functions. 

"Ultimately, however, the globalization of hemispheric free trade runs counter to national independence, bringing each of the participating countries into a  converged economic, political, and military structure. Think of it as a “grand chess play,” where the average citizen doesn’t even make the grade of 'pawn'.”

In 1931, Arnold Toynbee, who was Fabian socialist, a member of the Rhodes Round Table and a court historian for the British Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA) which is a counterpart to America's Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) gave a speech to the Conference of Institutions for the Scientific Study of International Affairs in Copenhagen and said:  “If we are frank with ourselves, we shall admit that we are engaged on a deliberate and sustained and concentrated effort to impose limitations upon the sovereignty and independence of the fifty or sixty local sovereign independent States [he means countries such as Canada and America] which at present partition the habitable surface of the earth and divide the political allegiance of mankind.”

". . . The harder we press our attack upon the idol [of sovereignty], the more pains we take to keep its priests and devotees in a fool’s paradise—lapped in a false sense of security which will inhibit them from taking up arms in their idol’s defense.  The local national state, invested with the attributes of sovereignty—is an abomination of desolation standing in the place where it ought not.  It has stood in that place now . . . for four or five centuries.  Our political task in our generation is to cast the abomination out . . . I will not prophesy.  I will merely repeat that we are at present working, discreetly but with all our might, to wrest this mysterious political force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local national states of our world.  And all the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands . . . impugn[ing] the sovereignty of the local national states of the world . . ."

Let Me Ask You Something . . . How often have you heard people refer to America as a Democracy?  When was the last time that you heard America referred to as a Republic?   There is a very good reason that our Pledge of Allegiance refers to our country as a Republic and there is a very good reason that our Declaration of Independence and our Constitution does not even mentioned the word "democracy".

Many people are under the false impression our form of government is a democracy, or representative democracy. This is of course completely untrue. The Founders were extremely knowledgeable about the issue of democracy and feared a democracy as much as a monarchy.  They understood that the only entity that can take away the people's freedom is their own government, either by being too weak to protect them from external threats or by becoming too powerful and taking over every aspect of life.

Our forefathers knew very well the meaning of the word "democracy", and the history of democracies; and they were deliberately doing everything in their power to prevent having a democracy.

In a Republic, the sovereignty resides with the people themselves.  In a Republic, one may act on his own or through his representatives when he chooses to solve a problem. The people have no obligation to the government; instead, the government is a servant of the people, and obliged to its owner, We the People.  Many politicians have lost sight of that fact.  I think we need to send them a message in November.

A Constitutional Republic has some similarities to democracy in that it uses democratic processes to elect representatives and pass new laws, etc.  The critical difference lies in the fact that a Constitutional Republic has a Constitution that limits the powers of the government.  It also spells out how the government is structured, creating checks on its power and balancing power between the different branches.

The goal of a Constitutional Republic was to avoid the dangerous extreme of either tyranny or mobocracy but what exists in America today is a far cry from the Constitutional Republic our forefathers brought forth.

Today we have DO have a mobocracy occurring in our streets all across America.  Sadly, such mobocracy or 'mob rule' was endorsed and encouraged by Sen. John McCain who praised the recent wave of pro-illegal immigration demonstrations by saying . . . "if the protesters hang tough they will succeed in forcing Congress to liberalize immigration laws.  If such demonstrations continue, I think we will have a bill for the President to sign soon . . . The more debate, the more demonstrations, the more likely we will prevail."   He was of course referring to the Senate's massive illegal-alien amnesty bill S. 2611 which did in fact, pass.  Was S. 2611 passed to appease the mob? If so, it is a perfect example of rule by mobocracy!

Article IV Section 4 of the Constitution states:  "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion . . .   Is it doing that?  

Not only is our Constitution being ignored, the exact OPPOSITE is being encourage by John McCain and seconded  by ALL those who voted for S. 2611 in the Senate.  If you want to preserve the Constitutional Republic you should vote out of office . . . every single senator that voted for S. 2611.

My favorite quote is by Tom Tancredo who speaks to the treasonous position of those who would promote anarchy and mobocracy in our streets.  He said:  "When I took the oath of office, it wasn't to my party or the President.  It was to the Constitution."

However, rule by mobocracy is only a tiny part of what is happening here in America.  The larger problem we are facing is related to those who would support and approve of mob rule.  It is called tyranny.  What is tyranny?  Simply put, we are being governed by tyrants who have usurped the will of the people.  Our government has become a raging bull elephant, no pun intended, and is totally out of control.  We are well on the road to fascism, which was defined by Mussolini as the combining of capitalism and Communism.  

There is underway . . . a betrayal of the American people by a government cabal who are bent on destroying our sovereignty in order to create a North American Union.  The miscreants include many who function at the highest levels in our government.  Many hold membership in the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Trilateral Commission and pursue a subversive agenda.  The cabal is deliberately circumventing the U.S. Congress and 'We the People' in blatant violation of our Constitution.  Collectively they are committing TREASON.  If you continue to believe that the illegal alien invasion is the biggest threat to America, you will never understand that there is something far more dangerous to our country called the "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" (SPP).  As bad as the illegal alien situation is . . . you will learn that this nation is in dire peril far exceeding the illegal alien problem.

I urge you to educate yourself.  If you have access to a computer you need to read what your own government has posted on their official websites such as the Whitehouse.gov, SPP.gov, State.gov and Canada.USembassy.gov.  You will be aghast at the nearly complete destruction of our sovereignty, Bill of Rights, Constitution, laws, Republic, and freedoms they have ALREADY achieved.  This heinous ongoing treason has been engineered by an entrenched cabal of legislators, courts, military brass, and government employees in this and prior administrations.  The tyranny is being facilitated by hundreds of people embedded at all levels of the executive branch and Congress constituting a so called 'Shadow Government' who are working in concert to dismantle this country in plain sight.  Their agenda  was engineered by  the Council on Foreign Relations(CFR) and kept secret by a deliberately silent media who work in collaboration by treating the America people like mushrooms.  We are kept in the dark and fed you know what . . . mislead by their propaganda.

If you don't have a computer, get one.  It is the last bastion of freedom to information and knowledge left to 'We the People'.  Ask questions.  Think for yourself and be advised that our current congress is working hard to eliminate, curtail and control your access to the internet as we speak.

Always keep in mind as the balance of power continues to be usurped by the executive branch elevating the current president to Dictator-in-Chief.  Thomas Jefferson warned that . . . When the government fears the People, that is Liberty.  When the People fear the Government, that is tyranny.

Didn't you ever wonder why most Americans don't know that is going on in their own country?

The answer is that the media is completely controlled by a very few who work in concert with the money mafia.  A plutocracy that consists of a group of very wealthy people who control our government and has done so for more than a century.  They deliberately set out to propagandize their goals and ambitions long enough, loud enough and often enough to overcome your objections.  Their most consistent and liberally applied propaganda weapon has been that of omission. 

How Do We Know What They Have Done?  Here Are Some Historical Clues . . . "One night, in roughly 1880, John Swinton (1829-1901), a preeminent New York journalist and prior editor of the NY Times from 1860-1870, was the guest of honour at a banquet given him by the leaders of his craft. Someone who knew neither the press nor Swinton offered a toast to the independent press. Swinton's response enraged his colleagues when he said:

There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it.

There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone.

The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it, and what folly is this toasting an independent press?

We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.

Control of the American Media by the Wealthy Elite is Nothing New . . .  In February 1917, Congressman Callaway inserted the following statement in the Congressional Record in an effort to expose the control of our newspapers by J.P. Morgan and his associates. Their intent was to use the print media to disseminate propaganda aimed at forcing the United States into the First World War.

"In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests ... got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press of the United States. These 12 men worked the problem out by selecting 179 newspapers, and then began, by an elimination process, to retain only those necessary for the purpose of controlling the general policy of the daily press throughout the country. They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. The 25 papers were agreed upon; emissaries were sent to purchase the policy ... of these papers; ... an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information.... This contract is in existence at the present time, and it accounts for the news columns of the daily press of the country being filled with all sorts of preparedness arguments and misrepresentations...."

By the end of World War II, the Rockefellers, and their front organization the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), rivaled the power of J.P. Morgan interests in controlling the major media and publishing outlets in the United States. Charles Austin Beard was America's leading historian during the first half of the twentieth century. Writing in the Saturday Evening Post on October 4, 1947, warned:

"The Rockefeller Foundation and the Council on Foreign Relations ... intend to prevent ... a repetition of what they call ... "the debunking journalistic campaign following World War I." Translated into precise English, this means that the Foundation and the Council do not want journalists or any other persons to examine too closely and criticize too freely the official propaganda and official statements relative to our basic aims and activities during World War II." 

Even in 1947 it was apparent that the Rockefellers and the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) had the power to censor the news. It is not simply by chance that since 1953 all but one American Secretary of State, all but one Deputy Secretary of State, all but one Director of the CIA, and every Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board have come from the Rockefeller-controlled Council on Foreign Relations.   [In FACT] . . . 6 of our last 9 Presidents have been CFR members.

Then There Was the Russian Observations Made:  "During the Cold War, a group of Russian journalists toured the United States. On the final day of their visit, they were asked by their hosts for their impressions. 'I have to tell you,' said their spokesman, “that we were astonished to find, after reading all the newspapers and watching TV, that all the opinions on all the vital issues were, by and large, the same. To get that result in our country, we imprison people, we tear out their fingernails.  Here, you don't have that. What's the secret?  How do you do it?”

What is the secret? It's a question now urgently asked of those whose job is to keep the record straight: who in this country have extraordinary constitutional freedom. I refer to journalists, of course, a small group who hold privileged sway over the way we think, even the way we use language.

I have been a journalist for more than 40 years. Although I am based in London, I have worked all over the world, including the United States, and I have reported America's wars. My experience is that what the Russian journalists were referring to is censorship by omission, the product of a parallel world of unspoken truth and public myths and lies: in other words, censorship by journalism . . ."

Why is it Most Americans are Unaware of the CFR Organization ?

David Rockefeller chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) for 15 years (1970-1985), also founded and is the honorary chairman of the Trilateral  Commission.  His father John D. and brother Nelson purchased and then donated the land beneath the UN for $8.5 million dollars, then claimed it as a charitable deduction.(1) 

As for how the machinations of the CFR have remained unnoticed . . . in 1991 in Baden-Baden, Germany, David Rockefeller gloatingly said:  "We're grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years.  It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government.."(2)  . . . Are you?

CFR member Richard N. Gardner, who in a 1974 article titled: "The Hard Road to World Order" wrote:  In short, the "house of world order" will have to be built from the bottom up rather than the top down [and require] . . . an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece.

Here's Rockefeller's 1973 View on Communist China . . . "The enormous social advances of China have benefited greatly from the singleness of ideology and purpose . . . The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in history." 

The Cultural Revolution claimed the lives of nearly 100 million people in order to achieve the 'success' that David Rockefeller admires.  One might question just how he can reconcile those deaths and consider it something of value and worthy of praise instead of being condemned for its abject horror and inhumanity.  Perhaps Mr. Rockefeller  needs a little 're-education.'

And what does David Rockefeller say about his work? "For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions.  Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interest of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists ' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will.  If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."

What colossal arrogance!  Like other globalists, he loses sight of man's humanity and the very fundamental nature of what it is to BE human.  Mankind will ALWAYS resist subjugation and will ALWAYS struggle to have and maintain their freedoms . . .  after all . . . for us Americans . . . it is the very essence of what it is to BE an American.

How Did the CFR Get Started?  "In September 1939, two members of the Council on Foreign Relations [CFR] visited the State Department to offer the council's services."

"They proposed to do research and make recommendations for the department without formal assignment or responsibility, particularly in four areas - security armaments, economic and financial problems, political problems, and territorial problems. The Rockefeller Foundation agreed to finance the operation of this plan."

"From that day forward, the Council on Foreign Relations has placed its members in policy-making positions with the State Department and other federal agencies.  Every Secretary of State since 1944, with the exception of James F. Byrnes, has been a member of the [CFR] council."   The trend continues on as both Condalezza Rice and Colin Powell are members of the CFR.

Some Others Who have Spoken Out About the 'Shadow Government' are "Rear Admiral Chester Ward, USN (Retd.), who was a member of the CFR for sixteen years.  He wrote, 'The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common--They want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the United States."

"Felix Frankfurter, Justice of the Supreme Court (1939-1962) said:  The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes."

In a speech given on February 23, 1954, Senator William Jenner warned America:  "Outwardly we have a Constitutional government.  We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government, a bureaucratic elite which believes our Constitution is outmoded." 

In fact, the Constitution is far more than 'outmoded,' according to President Bush who rebuffed GOP leader's request to soft pedal some parts of the 'Patriot Act' by saying:  "I don't give a goddamn . . . I'm the President and the Commander-in-Chief.  Do it my way."  Then, responding to an aid who stated:  "There is a valid case that the provisions in this law undermine the Constitution."  Bush screamed back:  "Stop throwing the constitution in my face . . . It's just a goddamned piece of paper!"

As for the 'bureaucratic elite' of wealthy globalists who function as the 'Shadow Government'  . . . their ultimate goal is a so called NEW World Order, which is course is NOT NEW but is, in reality, a ONE World Order.  To that end, Franklin Delano Roosevelt managed to condemn their monopolist lust from the grave in a message found enshrined on his memorial in Washington, DC:

THEY (WHO) SEEK TO ESTABLISH

SYSTEMS OF GOVERNMENT BASED ON

THE REGIMENTATION OF ALL HUMAN

BEINGS BY A HANDFUL OF INDIVIDUAL

RULERS CALL THIS A NEW ORDER

IT IS NOT NEW AND IT IS NOT ORDER

And What Does a World Controlled by the United Nations Look Like?   Written in 1962 and prepared by the Institute for Defense Analyses submitted to the Department of State:  "A world effectively controlled by the United Nations is one in which "world government" [One World Government (OWO)]would come about through the establishment of supranational institutions [such as the UN], characterized by mandatory universal membership and some ability to employ physical force. Effective control would thus entail a preponderance of political power in the hands of a supranational organization [i.e. the United Nations] rather than in individual national units [like the United States], and would assume the effective operation of a general disarmament agreement. 

Are we there yet?  Think UNESCO, LOST, Earth Charter, Agenda 21, Areas Foundations, CANAMEX, 'Global Warming' and the Kyoto Treaty, the World Court, The Hague, WTO, GATT, NASCO, NAFTA, CAFTA and all the rest of the alphabet entities granted external control over the sovereign nation of the United States of America. 

Coming up . . . the FTAA (Free Trade Areas of the Americas), the final nail in America's coffin.  The Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) is an attempt to expand the failed North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) to every country in Central America, South America and the Caribbean, except Cuba. Negotiations began right after the completion of NAFTA in 1994 and were supposed to have been completed by January 1, 2005.   Sovereignty? For how much longer?

The Goal of the Globalists Is To Gain World Monopoly.  According to "Antony Sutton, a research fellow for the Hoover Institution for War, Revolution, and Peace at Stanford University . . . 'While monopoly control of industries was one the objectives of J.P. Morgan and J.D. Rockefeller, by the late nineteenth century the inner sanctums of Wall Street understood the most efficient way to gain an unchallenged monopoly was to 'go political' and make society go to work for the monopolists-- under the name of the public good and the public interest'."

"Frederick C. Howe revealed the strategy of using government in a 1906 book, Confessions of a Monopolist: These are the rules of big business . . . Get a monopoly; let society work for you; and remember that the best of all business is politics . . . "

To fully understand the truly 'dark side' of a monopoly, how about using "food as a weapon" as was once declared by Henry Kissinger.  All food starts with seeds and there is now a patented technology invented by a company called Delta & Pine Land, which is about to be acquired by Monsanto, because they engineered a 'Terminator' seed which cannot be used for the next year's crop because it automatically self-destructs at the end of the growing season.  How sick is that?  

The story is a litany of twisted devious financial and political connections concluding with three paragraphs that state:  "The key scientific member of the Delta & Pine Land board since 1993 has been Dr. Nam-Hai Chua.  Chua, 62, is also head of the Rockefeller University Plant Molecular Biology Laboratory in New York, and has been for over 25 years, the labs which are at the heart of the Rockefeller Foundation’s decades-long development, and spending of more than $100 millions of its own research grants to create their Gene Revolution.  Until 1995, Chua was also a scientific consultant to Monsanto Corporation, as well as to DuPont’s Pioneer Hi-Bred International. Chua is at the heart of Rockefeller’s Gene Revolution.  And, clearly, Delta & Pine Land and their research on Terminator [seed] have been in the center of that work."

If you think about it, by sending our manufacturing base to Mexico or other foreign countries, the globalists have FORCED America to become global when in the past we were self-contained and produced all we needed for ourselves and exported our excess around the world.  Now we are dependent on countries like Communist China, etc., to supply stores like Wal-mart with nearly all of its merchandise and thus we have become a de facto global economy without our consent and strident calls for it to stop. 

In fact . . . you will find that the cabal working toward the NAU has gone one step further and created non-profit foundations to develop many of the road and infrastructure projects that are planned under NAFTA 'plus' called the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP).  This means that NO TAXES will enter the coffers of America's government till.  Even worse . . . you will find that they are using all manner of federal tax dollars to fund some of the 'non-profit' projects that are already in place.  Clever by half, wouldn't you say.  Take taxpayer dollars, make money and pay no taxes in return while America, by default, becomes the North American Union. 

The 'Shadow Government has begun their 'race to the finish' and have become ever more arrogant and bold.  They have concluded that they are so close to complete conquest that they are ever more blatantly flouting our Constitution and laws than you can ever imagine in your wildest of dreams of hell on earth.

Didn't you ever wonder why our borders are still wide open?

Didn't you ever wonder why our immigration laws are unenforced?

Didn't you ever wonder why CAFTA was passed in the House by two recanted votes after the time for voting had expired?  Especially in light of the fact that most ordinary people would agree that NAFTA has been such a devastating failure for both Mexico and America.

Didn't you ever wonder why the Senate told 83% of 'We the People' to 'go to hell' when they passed the amnesty bill S. 2611 which will add 100 million people to America in the next ten years according to Dr. Robert Rector of the Heritage Institute.  That number is a CONSERVATIVE estimate since statisticians extrapolated those numbers from the 2000 census to arrive at the totally bogus figures of 10-12 million illegals.

Didn't you ever wonder why the reconquista rabble can march in our streets and shout from the roof tops that they want to take over the Southwest and our government doesn't investigate them for sedition like they did the VA nurse who wrote a letter to the editor complaining about the Iraq War, and the government's handling of Hurricane Katrina.

What is sedition?  Webster's defines it as follows:  "The Stirring up of discontent, resistance, or rebellion against the government in power."   These photos speak directly to the issue of sedition in the streets of America.  

See that the reconquista rabble in our streets as they shout their anti-American rants of sedition, which  unlike the VA nurse, remain unchallenged to this day.

What is sedition?  It is "The Stirring up of discontent, resistance, or rebellion against the government in power."  

In "1968---The Hispanic organization, the Southwest Council of LaRaza Unida, was created with a $630,000 grant from the Ford Foundation, which supports the movement to bring massive numbers of Mexicans into the U.S.  From 1968 to 1992, Ford Foundation grants to radical Hispanics totaled over $31 million.  And according to Henry Santiestevan (former head of the Southwest Council of LaRaza), It would hardly be an exaggeration to say that the Ford Foundation IS the Chicano movement."

Along with the non-profit foundations that are funding the racist mobocracy, there has been a concerted effort by our own government to aid and abet the massive illegal alien anarchy you see in our streets. 

Then there are the corporate entities that have facilitated the mobocracies that occurred in March, April and May of 2006.   For example . . . McDonalds was but one of many other corporations that supported the mobocracy AND frequently employs illegals instead of our youth or the working poor not to mention the under employed since our government has unconscionably encouraged, endorsed and promoted outsourcing, insourcing and off-shoring of many of our lower to middle class jobs.   Here is an example of Mc Donald's position . . .

In a speech made before the U.S. Senate on December 15, 1987 Senator Jesse Helms, spoke eloquently about the coming One World Order or more accurately the coming global monopolies when he said: 

"This campaign against the American people - against traditional American culture and values - is systematic psychological warfare.  It is orchestrated by a vast array of interests comprising not only the Eastern establishment but also the radical left.  Among this group we find the Department of State, the Department of Commerce, the money center banks and multinational corporations, the media, the educational establishment, the entertainment industry, and the large tax-exempt foundations.

A careful examination of what is happening behind the scenes reveals that all of these interests are working in concert with the masters of the Kremlin in order to create what some refer to as a New World Order.  Private organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations, . . . the Trilateral Commission, .. . . Bilderberger Group serve to disseminate and to coordinate the plans for this so-called New World Order in powerful business, financial, academic, and official circles . . .

The influence of establishment insiders over our foreign policy has become a fact of life in our time.  This pervasive influence runs contrary to the real long-term national security of our Nation.  It is an influence which, if unchecked, could ultimately subvert our constitutional order.

In the globalist point of view, nation-states and national boundaries do not count for anything.  Political philosophies and political principles seem to become simply relative.  Indeed, even constitutions are irrelevant to the exercise of power.  Liberty and tyranny are viewed as neither necessarily good nor evil, and certainly not a component of policy.

In their point of view, the activities of international financial and industrial forces should be oriented to bringing this one-world design - with a convergence of the Soviet and American systems as its centerpiece - into being . . . All that matters to this club is the maximization of profits resulting from the practice of what can be described as finance capitalism, a system which rests upon the twin pillars of debt and monopoly.  This isn't real capitalism.  It is the road to economic concentration and to political slavery."

Didn't you ever wonder why the Soviet Union collapsed so abruptly and without a push from some exterior force?  Do you suppose that it was engineered by the Global Shadow Government in order to facilitate a joining of the United States with Russia seem more palatable and less threatening,

Then There is the  'Back Door' Approach to Eliminating America's Sovereignty . . . By auctioning off America to the highest bidder, no questions asked as . . . "According to the Secretary of the Department of Transportation, Norman Mineta, 'We are like a poker game.  We are inviting people to the table and saying, bring money when you come'."

Didn't you ever wonder who CFIUS was when you heard they approved the Dubai Ports deal? 

Its full name is the 'Committee on Foreign Investment in the US' which falls under the aegis of the U.S. Treasury Department.  CFIUS was established in 1975 by Gerald Ford's Executive Order 11858.  An Executive Order is legislation by Presidential fiat!  Then in 1988 Ronald Reagan delegated his oversight to CFIUS by Executive Order 12661.  This order required CFIUS "to submit a report and recommendation to the President at the conclusion of an investigation."

Marta Lavandier (AP)

If you will recall, it was CFIUS that insanely approved the United Arab Emirates, Dubai Ports World (DPW) takeover  of 6 of our major seaports.  Remember . . . it was a 'done deal' by time the sale became public.  The committee works in SECRET and makes SECRET decisions.  CFIUS has reviewed 1500 cases and blocked only ONE!  The Dubai deal was approved even after several federal agencies objected to it on security grounds.  Only when there was public outcry did the deal come under scrutiny.

What was interesting was that George Bush professed 'no knowledge' of the deal even though CFIUS is required to submit "a report and recommendation to the President at the conclusion of an investigation."   "The Committee has 30 days to decide whether to investigate a case and an additional 45 days to make its recommendation.  Once he recommendation is made, the President has 15 days to act if necessary block the deal.

Was Bush lying about his knowledge concerning such a massive transaction with obvious major security implications or was it simple incompetence?  He should have known if CFIUS was abiding by the rules.  Compounding the felony, President Bush "threatened to veto any attempt by Congress to kill the port deal."

Many Americans understood that:  "The [DPW] deal is yet another plot, approved in secret, which would undermine American national security and sovereignty for the benefit of the transnational political and commercial plutocrats who manage government and business across the globe."

AFTER the Dubai Deal Came Under Fire the Treasury Department and DHS (Dept. of Homeland Security) then dutifully spewed forth bogus propaganda  in defense of the CFIUS approval. 

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) threw in its two-cents worth of propaganda during the Senate debate on the U.S.-Oman free trade agreement with a fatuous non sequitur which stated:  "Congress may not appreciate what is at stake.  Far from being in continuous conflict, open capital markets and national security support one another.  A strong economy is part of national security . . . "

Isn't that backwards?  Shouldn't the WSJ have said that a strong national security provides 'support' for the economy?  Isn't it paramount that security NOT be a part of the economic engine so that the 'almighty dollar' couldn't  trump securi