Stop The North American Union Banner
Small Stop The North American Union Banner
Back

The EU and the NAU ~ Two Peas In A Pod!
By Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D.
May 20, 2007
Latest Update July 27, 2008

The formation of the European Union (EU) is the 'blueprint' being used to construct the North American Union (NAU).  In multiple acts of treason, our government is illegally creating the NAU by using secret meetings and deceptive double-speak to hide their 'INCREMENTAL STEALTH'.  They are making MASSIVE changes to our bureaucratic-administrative-regulatory laws by calling them 'HARMONIZATIONS.'  What they are doing is re-writing our legal regulatory law to the benefit of, by, and for the corporate elite, which is . . . classic fascism.  The only difference between the creation of the EU and the NAU is that it took 55 years for the European free trade agreement to morph into the EU.  Unless we can stop them, they will accomplish the NAU here in a BREATHTAKING 15 years.  The One World Monopolists have already declared before our Congress, that our borders are to be eliminated by 2010.  Are you ready for that?

Jelly Beans If you think the latest tri-lateral 'summit' in Montebello, Quebec, Canada (August 20-21, 2007) was about the contents of jelly beans', or the size of baby food jars, or the regulation of food colour dyes . . . think again!  Why was the tri-lateral meeting in Banff last year, and summit in Montebello this year, taking place behind closed doors?  No press allowed, with only one invited exception.  Is there something to hide?

Why are there many members of the U.S. Congress who know nothing about the contents of those meetings, nor the fact that the President has designated the Commerce Department to spearhead the creation of working groups, in every department of the Executive Branch, who are tasked with manipulating our regulatory laws?  Why is there no transparency and Congressional oversight as is REQUIRED by our Constitution?

To learn the answer to these questions, read on . . .

This research will clearly demonstrate what has been created under the EU is EXACTLY what they want to impose upon our Constitutional Republic.  How do we know?  Because the One World Monopolists have boldly announced their intentions.  Dr. Robert A. Pastor, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), "told the Trilateral Commission in 2002 that the North American Union needed to implement a series of political proposals which would have authority OVER the sovereignty of the United States, Canada and Mexico.(1)

Specifically, Pastor called for the creation of North American passports and a North American Customs and Immigrations, which would have authority OVER U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) within the Department of Homeland Security.  A North American Parliamentary Group would OVERSEE the U.S. Congress.  A Permanent Court on Trade and Investment would resolve disputes within NAFTA, exerting FINAL AUTHORITY OVER judgments of the U.S. Supreme Court.  A North American Commission would 'develop an integrated continental plan for transportation and infrastructure'."(1)

Their audacious treason knows no bounds!


European Union Flagg Martin, Bush, & Fox
  The Treasonous Triumvirate ~ Martin, Bush and Fox


What 'Political Proposals' REALLY Mean . . .

It means that the 'leaders' of three sovereign nations can gather at a 'round table' and sign the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) agreement which will implement all the concepts outlined by the CFR, WITHOUT the required Constitutionally mandated, Congressional consent, oversight, or transparency.

Political proposals means that three politicians get together and clandestinely agree to use the power of their elected office to unilaterally create the North American Union with no intention of allowing any legislative involvement or permission from We the People.  That is, by any measure . . . TREASON!

Those 'heads of state' are part of a cabal that includes the former corporatist robber barons, who control the banks, the media and the non-profit foundations such as the Carnegie, Ford, and Rockefeller (CFR).  They constitute a Shadow Government of One World Monopolists who control our government by wielding their immense financial wealth and its associated power.  They are operating behind the scenes in collusion with many in high places in our government, military, and corporate world.  Their goal is to destroy our Constitutional Republic, usurp our sovereignty and irrevocably alter our lives.  They plan to turn North America into a totalitarian state ruled by a corporate plutocracy -- a totalitarian government, OF the wealthy, BY the wealthy, and FOR the wealthy.

The first public mention of their illegal plans was made by the 'leaders' of Mexico, Canada and America on March 23, 2005 in Waco, Texas.  Those three traitors of their respective nations, held meetings at Baylor University, and SIGNED a European Union styled pact called the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) of North America.  Since then, our 'Chief Executive' has commanded ALL of the departments in the Executive Branch to form 'task forces,' agendas, goals and meet timetables for completion.

Their task is to rewrite MANY of our regulatory laws covering every conceivable topic you can imagine relating to our daily lives.  They operate behind closed doors in secret meetings to advance their goal of 'HARMONIZING' ALL of our bureaucratic or administrative regulatory laws, between the three countries, by altering them to their benefit.

Since Waco, our government has lied about having signed the SPP agreement.  Their dirty deed was barely reported in the media.  There was little to no follow-up reporting by the corrupt, monopolized and controlled corporate media.  Just think of all those endless hours of drivel on the news about Anna Nichole Smith, or Michael Jackson, or O J Simpson, or Natalie Holloway, or Gary Condit of Chandra Levy infamy, and yet barely a peep about the single most devastating plan to eliminate our sovereignty and end America as we know it.

Because of the complicit media, We the People are left completely in the dark.  For the most part, we have no idea that our country is already being run by an unelected and un-accountable elite plutocracy.  Just think about it . . . a 'Shadow Government' and their complicit cabal, were able to direct the launching of the NAU as a political proposal signed by three men who were the duly elected leaders from three sovereign countries.  Our Constitution says that such agreements are to be subjected to Congressional oversight and approval.

The SPP is a Trojan Horse based on the EU blueprint of massive 'harmonized' and ILLEGAL regulatory changes, using incremental stealth, all with the intent of destroying our Constitutional Republic.

SPP Logo
SPP
+ NAFTA Flagf
NAFTA
= European Union Flag
EU

Exactly what is the 'Shadow Government?'  Who are these people?  Why are they pursuing the NAU by using the well-honed EU technique of 'incremental stealth'?  What do they have to hide?  You will learn that there is a very long history of behind the scenes manipulation and control by the members of the anti-sovereignty, anti-American, CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) and its executive branch, the Trilateral Commission, along with the Bilderberg group and the Council of the Americas, ALL of which are founded, funded or run by David Rockefeller.  Their membership has blatantly announced and published their arrogant treasonous plans for the North American Union in many venues.

The EU style blueprint using incremental 'harmonizations' has been promoted and addressed by many in the CFR who ALSO hold high level governmental, military, media and corporate positions who work with willing dupes and co-conspirators.  If you are not 'up to speed' on the basics about those facts and the coming North American Union it is suggested that you read this author's Treason Abounds ~ Gov't Cabal Plots North American Union (NAU)> found here.(2)

How Close Are We To Becoming Another EU?  Compare These Facts . . .

The European Union (EU) began as a Coal and Steel Free Trade Agreement in 1951.
The NAU began as NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994.

Then the EU morphed into the European Economic Community (EEC).
Before the U.S. Congress, CFR member Dr. Robert Pastor calls for a North American Community.

Once the EEC became established, it then morphed into the Common Market.
Now that NAFTA is established, it has morphed into the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP).

Britain joined the so called 'Common Market' in January, 1973 which then morphed into the European Union (EU).
The Security and Prosperity Partnership, begun in March 2005, is morphing into the North American Union (NAU).

The EU already has a single currency called the Euro.
The plan is for our single currency to be called the Amero.

The EU's UNELECTED and UNACCOUNTABLE 'leaders,' are an elite plutocracy, who 'answer' to NO ONE!

To understand what happens when you give up your sovereignty to become the NAU . . . you MUST watch this 43 minute video titled:  The Real Face of the European Union.  It is a SHOCKING documentary from 2004 that features EU insiders and commentators.  Independent author Phillip Day covers the history and goals of the European Union, as well as the disturbing, irrevocable implications this new government has for every British citizen.  He says that sadly, the mainstream media has refused comment, because the British press, just like ours, is totally controlled by the One World Monopolists.  Soon, for the European countries . . . ALL vestiges of national sovereignty will be ERASED FOREVER!  It is incrementally being replaced with a totalitarian dictatorship!

One Other Point . . .

Isn't it interesting that the slavishly praised cult of diversity and multi-culturalism, was completely abandoned when the One World Monopolists created the EU?  If they believed their own propaganda, then why did they obliterate all those grand, wonderfully distinct, and uniquely European nations by turning them into a single, drab, shapeless, blue blob, called the EU?  It seems that the One World Monopolists have created a singularly vapid, depressingly anonymous European Union, the complete opposite of the multi-culturalism and diversity they doggedly espoused.

As the final curtain falls, the EU is to be divided into 'regions' obliterating their geographic boundaries.  By design, unity will reign through the creation and enforcement of ONE legal system, ONE military, ONE police force, ONE flag, ONE currency, ONE national anthem, and eventually . . . only ONE language . . . English?

Why was it that one of the most prized, loudly and repeatedly touted, 'mantras' of the elites had been that of multi-culturalism and diversity, and yet they created in the EU a boring federalist superstate?  Oh, that's right, they used that mantra to bludgeon all the European countries into accepting more immigrants than they could assimilate or sustain.  Think about the riots and the vicious anti-Semitism running rampant in France, the militant Islamic threats to take power and bring forth Sharia Law in Britain, the riots in Australia, and the rampage over cartoons.  Do you suppose we too are being duped by those same One World Monopolists who espouse multi-culturalism and diversity as they facilitate the Hispanic invasion and de facto elimination of our sovereign borders?

European Union Map


Just Like the EU . . . Harmonization Is The Tool They Will Use To Erase America

A word you will see and hear often is . . . 'harmonise' or as we spell here in America, with a 'z' -- harmonize.  What exactly does 'harmonize' REALLY mean?  It means that people in a position of government trust have made an agreement to CHANGE and subvert our regulatory laws.  As you will learn that . . . by the stroke of a pen, wielded by unseen and unaccountable bureaucrats, who are signing into LAW agreements changing existing regulations, often detrimental to best interests of We the People.  None of these 'harmonized' agreements are being brought before our congress as is REQUIRED by our Constitution . . . TREASON ABOUNDS.

Ever since Fox, Bush and Martin signed the Security and Prosperity Partnership agreement, they have conducted secretly convened meetings of their 'ministers' to 'harmonize' ALL of our bureaucratic or administrative, regulatory laws.  Laws that cover EVERYTHING you can imagine effecting our daily lives, many examples of which will be discussed in this paper.

How the EU Carved Up Britain To Eliminate Their Sovereignty

David Noakes a Brit and avid anti-EU activist laments:  "Behind our backs the EU has divided up Britain into 5 regions that overlay the 12 already established.  They are called Transnational regions, often referred to as cross-border.  The plan is to unite us with areas on the Continent, ignoring the seas in between, and to render each side identical to eliminate all feelings of national loyalties.  During Germany’s EU Presidency, starting in January [20]07, cartographers will begin to “harmonise” all “spatial data” such as place names of areas, regions, localities, cities, suburbs, towns or settlements etc.  A current EU directive proposes a database for an EU wide property tax via the Valuation Office Agency, to levy Council and Inheritance Taxes."(3)

"ArcManche - First to be established in the South East Prominent is the South East that has an Arc Manche Region which sprawls across west Belgium, Northern France, Nantes, etc. linking Plymouth, Bristol, London and Dover.  All within that area now live in the Arc Manche Region of Europe.  Paris is its Capital; it has a Regional Assembly a Secretariat, a French President M. Alain le Vern (elected on the 17th Oct [20]06) and an English Vice Chairman Brad Watson OBE."(3)

It would seem that France has just annexed Britain since Paris will be the capital and the 'Arc Manche' is headed by a Frenchman.  Thus France has taken over British sovereign soil with the stroke of a pen.  It is a feat that used to be accomplished only by war.  Don't you wonder how the Brits feel about the 'peaceful' takeover of their sovereign land that many died to preserve for the British people, only to see it handed over to the French?

'Totalization' . . . An Example of 'Harmonization' . . .

Note the euphemistic (doublespeak) terms they used above to hide what they are actually doing.  For example, the words 'Transnational Regions', instead of 'Cross-Border divisions' of sovereign countries, is a slick and typical manipulation of your mind in order to make the 'bitter pill' go down smoothly.  Similarly they will 'harmonise'--'spatial data' instead of saying that they are compiling the names of the towns and cities that fall in the 'new' artificially drawn regions, and altering, combining or perhaps erasing towns and cities forever.  Purportedly they are compiling databases, to generate new, and now no longer comparable, property tax evaluations.  Or, who knows, possibly for other future privacy eroding, nefarious purposes.

Such doublespeak is not unique to the EU.  Similar words are being used here in America.  For example, there was a Social Security 'totalization' agreement signed with Mexico by our president.  The 'totalization' agreement was subsequently hidden from 'We the People' until a three and half year court battle FORCED the president to produce it.  It was a document that should have been immediately forthcoming under FOIA (Freedom Of Information Act), which it was not.  Why not?  Because the traitors had something to hide.

The agreement, when or IF it is subjected to approval by the Congress, will give illegal aliens who have committed a felony by using false or stolen identities, the ability to collect Social Security after illegally working here for only SIX quarters, in combination with their Mexican work history.  YOU have to work FORTY quarters in order to collect.  Keep in mind that corruption is so rampant in Mexico that a Mexican citizen could produce documents saying they had worked the proper number of quarters in Mexico to meet the combined total (i.e., totalization).(4)

That secrecy and flouting of our laws is EXACTLY how they did things to create the EU.  It is a common and often repeated modus operandi, being applied deliberately, without conscience, everywhere in America, involving just about everything imaginable.

Are You Ready To Roll Over And Give Up YOUR Sovereignty?

WTO Hand Grabs The World

As you now know, the EU is already a federalist superstate that will consist of REGIONS.  The prior nations of Germany, France, England, Italy, etc., do not even get to keep their previous geographic delineations as they are being melded into amorphous 'regions' so that their love of nationality and sovereignty can NEVER be resurrected.

A Ms. V (borrowed from the movie V for Vendetta) provides a wonderful, calm, soft and oblique view of how the formation of the EU has insanely altered the lives of the people in the UK.  She talks about how:  "The Fabian Socialists are having their way.  Tony Blair is handing the UK over to the EU.  The people are being lied to and the news being spun by hidden manipulators.  The unelected European Commission passes down its dictates to the rubber stamp European Parliament."(5)

Borders [are] being taken down, [there is] Mass immigration [and the] European Police, European Army and rapid reaction force [is] coming.  The people were not asked."  Ms 'V' asks:  Where is our Democracy:  Where is the Justice?  She tells you that:  "What Hitler failed to do and what many wars were fought over . . . is happening now in Europe... the dissolution of borders and Democratic rights.  Trial by Jury [is] to be suspended, guilty until proven innocent, no double jeopardy [protection], Habeas Corpus suspended."(5)

That last sentence is worth repeating . . . several times!  It says the following:

You cannot have a jury of your peers to decide if you are INNOCENT.  A single person who may have a bias, a secret agenda, who can be bribed, or on drugs, or crazy, or just plain unfit, gets to sit as BOTH judge AND jury.  That ONE person is the ONLY person who gets to decide your fate.

You are 'guilty' unless and until you can prove your innocence.  Why would anyone, no matter how heinous the crime, be assumed to be guilty?  That means that you have ALREADY BEEN JUDGED.  Who has the right to do that?  Why would anyone believe that is fair and equitable?  How do you fight for your innocence when you have already been condemned as guilty?  That concept is insane on its face.

The EU has eliminated the law of double jeopardy.  That means if a person is adjudged 'not guilty' and a government prosecutor is not happy with the decision, you can be tried again, and again, and again for the SAME crime, until they get the guilty verdict they so desire.  We all know about finding a judge who is sympathetic to some prosecutor's position is easy to arrange.  The people of Europe already live under these EU rules.

Habeas corpus has been suspended, which actually means eliminated.  What does that mean?  Habeas corpus literally means that there is 'body of evidence' indicating your guilt.  When the writ of habeas corpus is in effect, you can use it in court to require the penal system to show proof that they have legal and legitimate reasons for your incarceration.  When habeas corpus is suspended YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS.  They can put you in jail and throw away the key.  They can keep you there forever, and you have no recourse to petition the courts for your release.

Here in America . . . on October 17, 2006 the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (MCA) was signed into law.  The MCA has suspended habeas corpus, a law that has existed for more than 200 years.  The MCA creates a military tribunal that can call you an 'unlawful enemy combatant' and jail you without trial for the rest of your life.  This issue will be discussed more fully later.  You must understand that our long standing rights have ALREADY been removed.  Few are aware of it because of the deliberate treasonous omissions by the One World Monopolist controlled media.

Ms. V "V" "V"

"Ms V. points out how the UK is being suppressed by its own Government.  [She shows you] Newspaper articles [that] point this out.  There is one thing that the UK has ... [more free press than the USA].  Tony Blair in his quest to hand over the UK to the EU has not quite managed to control the press!"(5)

"Political Correctness and Environmentalism as the new religion of the NWO [New World Order], is being used to control its own citizens in the UK.  All intended to suppress the peoples nationalistic feeling and hand the country over to the European Union/New World Order.  Warning to the American People when you sign up to international Trading Agreements they come into your home and dictate your every move and thought.  This is how they take control of every individual.  It is happening in the UK and Europe now!"(5)

It is clear that things are 'spinning out of control' in the EU!  Listen to Ms. V, and get educated!  This is what is actually happening there NOW!  Americans need to pay attention to her warnings, because all that she speaks of is being replicated here in America.  As you watch, be afraid, be VERY afraid, it is not very far off, for us here in America, unless we work to stop the One World Monopolists and their diabolical scheme to create the North American Union, which is replica of the EU.


"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious.  But it cannot survive treason from within.  An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.  But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.  For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men.  He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist.  A murderer is less to fear." ~ Marcus Tullius Cicero (42 B.C.)


How Britain Lost Her Sovereignty . . .  Treason Abounds . . .

Signing of treaties is how they took over all the countries that comprises the EU.  "Since 1972 The Queen has illegally signed five of the six EU Treaties.  The five treaties define and build the EU as an unelected dictatorship.  The EU's laws, passed by Westminster, give it the powers of a police state.  The sixth EU treaty [set for May 2009] will complete the abolition of Britain as a nation . . .  A foreign power, the EU, will then rule us, and enforce the laws of a police state".(7)

Queen Elizabeth & Dick Cheney Queen Elizabeth(6)
The Queen and Dick Cheney Queen Elizabeth

"Europe [EU] works by bribing politicians with huge salaries and expenses to vote for Europe, against the best interest of their own voters. As a result all three parties are in favour of the EU - Westminster acts like a one party state. Whistleblowers like Marta Andreason, the EU Budget Director, who in 2005 found the EU couldn't account for 95% of its £66 billion budget, are simply fired for telling the truth."(7)

"EU corruption is now exploding through our Civil Service, our local government, and our 7,000 quangos. A shadow EU government lives inside our bureaucracy, headquartered in the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM.) It includes many parts of government including the RDA [the EU Rural Development Agency] and the Regional Assemblies. Common Purpose, an EU organisation, [of which] the UK branch also headquartered in the ODPM, has members across many government organisations including some city and county councils, the Land Registry, the police and the NHS, which it is destroying from within."(7)

"Common Purpose is the glue that enables fraud to be committed . . . It often involves the sale of public assets such as land to friends of politicians or their businesses. (The RDA . . . is a major player in this type of fraud.) And the handing out of plum government non jobs with big salaries and expenses to members of Common Purpose, all of it involving the theft of our money as taxpayers."(7)

"The EU's 111,000 regulations, when fully enforced, will transform Britain from a free market economy into a Soviet style command economy, closing hundreds of thousands more businesses. They will also control our personal lives far more closely than were those of Soviet citizens . . . [with] EU regulations, growing at 3,500 pa [per annum] . . . "(7)

"The deliberate destruction of our standards and way of life . . . From Sunday trading, where large stores force staff to work Sundays for derisory [insulting or laughable] pay - or they don't get a job, to the deliberate undermining of the family and teachers, to sex education for the under 13's . . . While inside atheist Europe, British Christianity has almost died out; safety on our streets and a great chunk of civilised life has left with it."(7)

"The EU has controlled our immigration since 1997. . . 903,000 immigrants arrived last year according to the city forecaster Capital Economics. The Amsterdam Treaty handed control of our immigration to the EU. [In the past] 30,000 a year used to arrive - the EU's increased it by 30 times --That's why house prices have been screaming up . . . Our infrastructure and services can't stand such huge numbers and is breaking down in some cities, where English people are becoming a 10% minority."(7)

And the similarities go on . . . Please do some further reading, in order to understand what is in store for you here in America. To do that you MUST learn what's is already happening in Europe, more specifically Britain. You can educate yourself by going to either this website or this one. Once there, follow the links on the left side of the page to learn more about what Britain and the others are facing. Take the time to get educated. This knowledge is powerful and may make the difference between winning and losing the battle to save our Constitutional Republic.(7)

The Interior Of The Brussels EU Parliament . . .

The EU parliament, consisting of 785 members, is in Brussels, Belgium. Quite splendiferous, is it not? Interestingly, the seat numbered 666 is never occupied. Perhaps they are leaving it open for someone special?(8)

Brussels EU Parliment

The Brussels, Belgium EU Parliament Building Exterior . . .

Brussels EU Parliment Exterior


Known officially as the Tower Building and unofficially as the 'crystal palace.'  You should also know that "the EU.’s chosen symbol was the Woman Riding the Beast.  The depiction of the same symbol was reproduced on the centenary stamp of the E.U. and in a huge painting in the Parliament’s new building in Brussels.  As if that weren’t enough, it was repeated again in a huge sculpture outside the new E.U. Council of Ministers office in Brussels for good measure."(6)

Very telling, is it not?

David Noakes David Noakes Gives Multiple Examples Of EU's Totalitarianism . . .

"The EU's corpus juris now pervades [overrides] right through our legal system.  Under Corpus Juris the [EU] government are above the law and cannot be prosecuted . . .  45,000 police officers got off [from prosecution by] speed cameras in this way in 2004, although their speeding killed 44 innocent people. (Daily Mail 27.12.05.)

The Local Government Act of 2000 empowered the head of the EU government in England, the Office of the Deputy Prime Minster (ODPM) to appoint a monitoring officer to spy on every council.  If an elected councillor disagrees with the EU or government line, the unelected "Standards Board for England" can suspend him for up to five years.  An example . . . ODPM has threatened cllr [Councilor] Alex Riley with suspension if he attends any debate discussing the ODPM's plans to build a new town of 20,000 people . . . on his ward.  The ODPM . . . powers are becoming absolute.

The EU arrest warrant (signed by the Queen on 18th November 2003) allows us to be arrested without charge and held indefinitely with no right to see a solicitor, make a phone call, or even a right to a trial.  You can simply disappear [because habeas corpus has been eliminated in Britain]."(7)

Note:  Habeas corpus was eliminated here in America on October 17, 2006 as detailed here by this author.
"The Civil Contingences Act 2004 allows government to confiscate anything you possess permanently; you have no right to object.  This includes your house.  It also gives government the right to forceably move its population around to different locations; . . . a Minister just needs to utter the words 'This is a national emergency.'  If a demonstration or strike [the] government doesn't like is being organised, they can cut off all communications in a town - phones, mobiles, the internet, TV, and block all access to that town including closing roads and railways.  It has all the powers and more of Hitler's Enabling Act of 1933."(7)

Note:  Here in America, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2007 eliminated the protections of the Posse Comitatus Act and re-wrote the Insurrection Act.  The NDAA will allow the president to declare a 'public emergency', call forth the military AND take control of state-based National Guard units without the consent of the governor or local authorities, at which time previously written Executive Orders will give the government and military TOTAL and COMPLETE control of EVERYTHING as detailed in this article by this author.
"At the Labour Party conference the police held an 82 year old man, Walter Woolfgang, and denied him access to the conference under the EU's "anti terrorist" legislation because he had shouted the word "nonsense" at Jack Straw, who was speaking about Iraq.  Terrified the TRUE nature of the laws they have passed on behalf of the EU was escaping too early, the Labour Party stopped the police and begged the man to return to conference.

On October 25th 2005 Miss Maya Evans was arrested under the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005, for a lone protest at the Cenotaph by reading out the names of the 97 British soldiers killed in the Iraq war.  She was arrested by no less than 14 police officers and found guilty at Bow Street Magistrates Court on the 8th December 2005.

Would you hand over our nation, to be ruled by a foreign power, with oppressive laws like these?  That's what's happening.

We have lost the right to protest . . . if we did hold a General Strike and blockade Westminster it would now require some bravery:  the powers the EU has demanded from our government enable it to respond in a way similar to the Chinese government's [action] in Tianamen Square . . .  It is no coincidence that since 2004, all MP's offices in Westminster are guarded by police with machine guns, inside and out.

All these new EU laws, including massive "antiterrorism" acts (recently 2000, 2001, 2005) were passed with the pretence they were only directed at terrorists . . . [instead] they are used far more often against ordinary law abiding people, particularly to suppress dissent.  (91% of those detained under Terrorism Acts are innocent and have been improperly arrested.  Most of the remainder are charged with offences that have nothing to do with terrorism, but [except to] cover up over zealous arrests).

[W]hole bureaucracies such as VOSA building up networks of cameras and databases to record our movements and criminalise us when we can't comply.  Persecution is no longer confined to motorists; under EU Corpus Juris our courts have become extensions of government power instead of independent arbiters of justice.

Westminster had passed sufficient of the EU's oppressive laws (the "harmonisation" in the Treaties) by the end of 2004 that we have been living in what is legally a police state since then.  But at the moment, it's only one per cent enforced.  After the Queen signs the sixth Treaty, the EU has the absolute power to enforce 100% of its regulations and laws."(7)
In Germany, They Are Making PREEMPTIVE Raids Against G-8 Protestors

Make Capitalism History Banner Reuters

"More than 900 federal and local police officers in cities including Berlin, Hamburg and Bremen searched some 40 apartments or offices used by various leftist groups, federal prosecutors said in a statement.  'The militant extreme left groups and their members are suspected of having founded a terrorist group, or of being members of such an organization, with the specific goal of staging firebombings and other violent attacks in order to disrupt or prevent the upcoming G-8 summit,' the statement said."(9)

G-8 Round UpBy AP/Fabian Brimmer

"'The only point of these searches is to criminalize and disrupt the protests against the G-8,' the group said.  'The accusation that terrorists would coordinate their movements through a leftist-run Internet server is ridiculous'."(9)

"Federal investigators have expressed concern the summit in the Baltic Sea resort of Heiligendamm could be a target for attack.  In December, anti-G-8 activists splashed paint on a hotel at the resort in northeastern Germany.  G-8 summits have often been a magnet for protests against globalization.  At a summit in Genoa in 2001, the demonstrations turned violent, with protesters and police battling in the streets for days."(9)

Let's see . . . this is 2007 . . . that means that since 2001, there has been FIVE YEARS without any serious problems.  And, one can surmise that the Genoa situation might not have turned violent if the protestors hadn't been subjected to the kind of police enforcement that dictatorially impeded or restricted their freedom to protest.

$17 Million Fence$17 million dollar fence

Why the are the Germans so paranoid about the G-8 protestors when:  "German security officials have built a $17 million fence around the resort in an effort to keep protesters from the event, hosted by German Chancellor Angela Merkel.  The leaders of the United States, Russia, Britain, France, Italy, Canada, and Japan are also to attend."(9)

In Merkel's Germany, Home Schooled Children Are Taken From Their Parents

Melissa Busekros (10)  "German homeschooler Melissa Busekros finally returned home early this morning on her 16th birthday after having been forcibly separated from her family by the government 3 months ago [February 2007].  Melissa was seized from her family home in a dramatic police raid for the crime of home schooling – illegal since 1937 by edict of Nazi Chancellor Adolph Hitler – and placed with a foster home in a location unknown to her family.  The International Human Rights Group (IHRG), which has doggedly championed the rights of Busekros and other German home schooling families, reports Melissa penned a note to her foster family and left in the dead of night, arriving on her [family's] doorstep in Erlangen at 3AM to the astonishment of her family."(11)

Melissa was lucky because she turned sixteen and under German law she can live where she chooses.  Otherwise she would still be held in the captivity of a foster family, where she was forced to undergo a psychiatric evaluation, which she passed with flying colors.

A homeschool advocate in Germany, who was afraid to reveal his name for fear of losing his job, wrote to World Net Daily:  "We are not far away from an intolerant dictatorship in our country.  Parental rights are more and more abolished.  If you do not educate the way the state wants, the so-called Jugendamt (youth welfare office) is quick to check out if they can take away the custody of your children.  As long as you practice your faith in a church building you have no problems, but as soon as you act in accordance to your faith, for example, in the education of your children, the freedom ends rapidly . . ."  He compared the current homeschool situation to the former Nazi rule which wrote the law, or "like in the former Soviet Union under the Communists."(12)

The Home School Legal Defence Associatiion (HSLDA) has complained that:  "Most recently, a decision was handed down by the European Court of Human rights (which) … completely turned the European Union Constitution's Article 14, the section on parent's rights to control the education of their children, completely upside down."(12)

The HSLDA believes that change will permit other EU 'states' to outlaw homeschooling at will.  "Meanwhile, the German homeschoolers continue to be unmercifully persecuted . . .  Families are fleeing regularly to other foreign countries in order to continue homeschooling…"(12)

Here Is the EU's OTHER Seat of Power -- a Parliament Building in Strasbourg, France . . .

Yes, this is the FINISHED building!

Strasbourg EU Parliment Building
Strasbourg EU Parliment Building Strasbourg EU Parliment Building


Strasbourg EU Parliment Building


Strasbourg is located in the Alsace Region of France on the German Border, considered to be French/German and is "regarded as the bridge of unity between modern France and Germany . . .  It is the first seat of the European Parliament and the only place where the whole parliament regularly meets.  (MEPs mostly work in Brussels, Belgium, where the other two main institutions of the EU are headquartered.)"(13)

Some have likened the shape and unfinished look of the building to a re-creation of the biblical 'Tower of Babel'.  A rather appropriate comment, considering the number of countries and the languages spoken there.

Could It Be A Resurrection of the Tower Of Babel?  You decide . . .

This is the European Union's (EU) first seat of Power -- the Parliament Building in Strasbourg, France.  It is where the unelected and unaccountable parliament 'leaders' regularly meet.  The 'Leaders' consist of a plutocratic oligarchy (a wealthy few).  The faux parliament of elected MEPs primarily meets in Brussels, Belgium where they are required to 'rubber stamp' what the 'leaders' want.

Tower Of Babel Tower of Babel Superimposed Upon EU Parliment Building


Just Signed:  The International Version Of The SPP Trojan Horse . . .

The Transatlantic Economic Integration AGREEMENT between the U.S. and the European Union was signed on April 30, 2007 at the White House by Bush, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who is the current president of the European Council and José Manuel Barros, President of the selected not elected European Commission.


Transatlantic Economic Integration Transatlantic Economic Integration Merkel & Bush José Barros

"The United States and the European Union have signed up to a new transatlantic economic partnership at a summit in Washington.  The pact is designed to boost trade and investment by harmonising regulatory standards, laying the basis for a US-EU single market."(14)

Prior to the 'summit' U.S. Deputy Secretary of the Treasury Robert M. Kimmitt said 'that to enhance trans-Atlantic economic ties, both sides have to 'address and reconcile our systemic differences and thereby reduce obstacles to economic growth'.”(15)

"Kimmitt welcomed German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s initiative on the trans-Atlantic market and said the United States and the EU should come to their April 30 summit meeting with a set of specific proposals to deepen their economic relations and develop a common approach to the global economy."(15)

Trade barriers between both sides of the Atlantic are already low; the real issue is to remove regulatory requirements and other obstacles to free capital flows, he said.(15)

"'Without the US,' says another European diplomat, ' There can't be any success in coping with a globalised world'.  This, say the Germans, is why Chancellor Merkel has embarked on an intensive effort to build an economic bridge to the US."(16)

Here's The REALLY Scary Part:  REGULATORY CONVERGENCE . . .

"The agreement established a new Transatlantic Economic Council to be chaired on the U.S. side by a cabinet-level officer in the White House and on the EU side by a member [an appointed position] of the European Commission . . . [who are] tasked with creating regulatory convergence between the U.S. and the EU on some 40 different public policy areas, including intellectual property rights, developing security standards for international trade, getting U.S. GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Practices) recognized in Europe, developing innovation and technology in health industries, implementing RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) technologies, developing a science-based plan on bio-based products and establishing a "regular dialogue" to address obstacles to investment."(17)

Since that's only six tasks, doesn't it make you wonder . . . what's hidden or lurking in the other thirty-two?

From the White House . . . this is the 'framework' of the agreement:  "We, leaders of the United States of America and the European Union (EU):  Believing that deeper transatlantic economic integration and growth will benefit our citizens and the competitiveness of our economies, will have global benefits, will facilitate market access for third countries and will encourage other countries to adopt the transatlantic economic model of respect for property rights, openness to investment, transparency and predictability in regulation, and the value of free markets;"(18)

The president says that:  "I told the Chancellor and the President that the EU-U.S. relations are very important to our country, that not only is it important for us to strategize how to promote prosperity and peace, but it's important for us to achieve concrete results.  And we have done so.  I thank the Chancellor and Jos [sic] very much for the trans-Atlantic economic integration plan that the three of us signed today.  It is a statement of the importance of trade.  It is a commitment to eliminating barriers to trade.  It is a recognition that the closer that the United States and the EU become, the better off our people become.  So this is a substantial agreement and I appreciate it."(19)

In case you missed it . . .

What has actually happened was that:  "President Bush signed an AGREEMENT creating a cabinet level 'permanent body' that commits the U.S. to 'deeper transatlantic economic integration,' without ratification by the Senate as a treaty or passage by Congress as a law."(17)

The Prince, The Queen, Laura Bush, G.W. Bush.jpg

The Coming 'Police State' In America . . .

Do you think we in America are immune from 'police state' tactics?  Don't you remember how they treated the protestors at the Republican presidential convention in New York City?  Was that just a 'warm up' for the future 'police state'?  Think about how they treat you in the airports now.  Are they 'practicing' their police state skills there?  What about the National Guard in New Orleans 'policing' our streets in violation of the posse comitatus law, which now no longer exists?  What about the Constitutionally protected gun possession which was violated by the illegal confiscation that took place after Katrina in New Orleans?  Was that more 'practice' for the coming martial law our government now can call forth for ANY reason?  Were you even aware that martial law is now an option for the president?

On October 17, 2006, 'a date which will live in infamy' . . . there were two 'Acts' of tyranny committed.  The first was a public signing of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (MCA) which eliminated the writ of habeas corpus allowing the president to declare you an 'unlawful enemy combatant' and end your rights to seek legal or judicial relief from unlawful imprisonment.

The writ of habeas corpus is a "fundamental instrument for safeguarding individual freedom against arbitrary and lawless state action".(20)

For the American citizen, the term 'unlawful enemy combatant' is very ominous.  The law states the following:
"(1) UNLAWFUL ENEMY COMBATANT - (A) The term 'unlawful enemy combatant' means--
(i) a person who has engaged in hostilities or who has purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its co-belligerents who is not a lawful enemy combatant (including a person who is part of the Taliban, al-Qaeda, or associated forces); or

(ii) a person who, before, on, or after the date of the enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, has been determined to be an unlawful enemy combatant by a Combatant Status Review Tribunal or another competent tribunal established under the authority of the president or the secretary of defense."(21)
"Notice that this definition contains no exception for Americans; it throws the blanket over citizen and alien alike by using the word 'person' rather than 'alien'."(22)

All Americans should know that the suspension of the 'writ of habeas corpus' by the 'Military Commissions Act of 2006' is a violation of Article 1, Section 9 of the U. S. Constitution which states:  "The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it."

What is MOST unsettling is that the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) thought the law to be significant enough to post the entire 'Act' on its website.  That should tell you something.  It is like notches on a gun, it reflects another one of their goals has been achieved.  Be afraid America . . . be VERY afraid(23)

Keith Olbermann Jonathan Turley

Watch this MSNBC video with Keith Olbermann and Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley covering the suspension or the death of Habeas Corpus 1789-2006.  During the video coverage of the MCA public ceremony, take notice of the shameful downcast shifting eyes of General Peter Pace and blank blinking eyes of CIA Chief and CFR member, General Michael Hayden, who are standing behind the president.  It shows that they both understand that they have just witnessed a coup de grace and know that the MCA has just created a dictator-in-chief!

Troops in New Orleans Troops in New Orleans


Martial Law Stalks America . . .

The second 'Act' of tyranny took place in a private Oval Office ceremony, in which the president signed into law the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2007 which eliminates the protections of the Posse Comitatus Act and re-wrote the Insurrection Act.

Posse Comitatus is Latin for 'power of the country.'  It WAS a law that was "championed by far-sighted Southern lawmakers in 1878.  They had experienced a fifteen year military occupation by the US Army in post-Civil War law enforcement.  They understood the heel of a jackboot."(24)

The Posse Comitatus Act banned the "Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines from participating in arrest, searches, seizure of evidence and other police-type activity on U.S. soil.  The Coast Guard and National Guard troops under the control of state governors are excluded from the act."(24)

Military Commissions Act Speech National Defense Authorization Act Signing

The NDAA also modified Sec. 334 of the Insurrection Act, giving the President authority to order the dispersal of either insurgents or 'those obstructing the enforcement of the laws'.  That particular section titled 'Insurrection' was renamed the 'Enforcement of the Laws to Restore Public Order'.

Under the 'revised' Insurrection Act the President can now deploy troops as a police force:  'during a natural disaster, epidemic, serious public health emergency, terrorist attack, OR OTHER CONDITIONS', when the President determines that the authorities of the state are 'incapable of maintaining public order'.

So . . . in a 'nutshell' . . . the NDAA will allow the president to declare a 'public emergency' call forth the military, take control of state-based National Guard, without the consent of the governor or local authorities, in order to 'suppress public disorder'!  The declaration of martial law will invoke Executive Orders (EOs) that will permit forced relocations, work camps and a plethora of other 'lawful orders' . . . that will control of every facet of life in this country.

The New Orleans, National Guard gun confiscation was the martial law 'trial' run.  Watch this video as the troops violate the fourth amendment which guarantees the "right of the people to be secure in their person, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated" without a warrant being issued.

The second amendment, which states that "the right to keep and bear Arms shall NOT be infringed", was also violated.  View this video of more gun confiscation by local police and sheriffs which occurs in complete, abject and total violation of our Constitutional Rights!

In The Final Analysis . . .

What is the purpose of the NAU?  It is to erase America by eliminating our Constitutional Republic, Bill of Rights, laws, and sovereignty.  Why bother to struggle to bring forth the NAU through a long drawn out process, when you can use, or create, a 'trigger' that will invoke each the two 'Acts' just discussed.  The MCA and the NDAA combined will provide for instant totalitarian rule, the ultimate goal of the NAU and the planned AU (Americas Union).

It took the One World Monopolists 55 years to create the EU.  They want much quicker results for the AU.  They are aging and dying and want to see more of their evil works come to fruition.

Just as the refusal to close our borders to illegal entry has allowed the de facto elimination of our sovereign southern border, a required component of the NAU, the elimination of the writ of habeas corpus by the MCA and the elimination of posse comitatus under the NDAA are additional, but very dangerous, components for achieving their ultimate goal of a totalitarian state.  It is a way to literally 'cut to the chase'!

What those two laws do is take away our freedom of speech and right of assembly under threat of imprisonment as an 'unlawful enemy combatant' while denying our Constitutional right to apply the writ of habeas corpus in order to end any unlawful imprisonment.

The MCA is a law which creates a "Combatant Status Review Tribunal" or "another competent tribunal established under the authority of the president or the secretary of defense" which will enable the government to call you an "unlawful enemy combatant" defined as "a person who has engaged in hostilities or who has purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its co-belligerents".

The NDAA also modified Sec. 334 of the Insurrection Act, giving the President authority to order the dispersal of either insurgents OR 'those obstructing the enforcement of the laws'.  Sec. 334 was titled 'Insurrection' which was renamed the 'Enforcement of the Laws to Restore Public Order'.

The 'revised' Insurrection Act, allows the President to deploy troops as a police force:  "during a natural disaster, epidemic, serious public health emergency, terrorist attack, OR OTHER CONDITIONS", when the President determines that the authorities of the state are "incapable of maintaining public order" (think FEMA and New Orleans here).

Under the NDAA, martial law can be declared as the result of a natural disaster (bird flu), or some created 'trigger event' like 9/11.  The declaration of martial law will invoke Executive Orders (EOs) that will permit forced relocations, work camps and a plethora of other 'lawful orders' . . . that will control of every facet of life in this country.

So . . . in a 'nutshell' . . . the NDAA will allow the president to declare a "public emergency" call forth the military, take control of state-based National Guard, without the consent of the governor or local authorities, in order to "suppress public disorder"!

Those two 'Acts' combined have created a dictator-in-chief and handed the president the ability to take control of the country and instantly put in place the ULTIMATE goal of the NAU, which is a totalitarian state.

At the very least it will make it impossible for We the People to publicly demonstrate our discontent with their treasonous NAU plans because you can be cited as an 'unlawful enemy combatant' who is engaged in 'public disorder.'  In fact if you protest in any way against the NAU, or its component parts, . . . they can call you an 'unlawful enemy combatant,' pick you up, put you in jail and throw away the key because the MCA eliminates the Constitutionally guaranteed writ of habeas corpus.

Just as the USA patriot act was the result of 9/11, the MCA and NDAA and its ability to call forth martial law will allow the shadow government to take over the country and dictatorially control ALL, under color of law.

Frightening beyond all measure . . .

You can find even more information about those two 'Acts' in this author's Two 'Acts' of Tyranny on the Same Day! found here, or you can listen to this MP3 which covers the same material.  You should warn your family, friends, neighbors and associates about the very real possibility of living and surviving under martial law.

As The Military Becomes The Police ~ The SWAT Police Become The Military . . .

"The historic and ominous re-writing of the Insurrection Act, accomplished in the dead of night, which gives Bush the legal authority to declare martial law, is now an accomplished fact."(25)

Militarized Police Militarized Police Militarized Police Militarized Police

"The Pentagon, as one might expect, plays an even more direct role in martial law operations.  Title XIV of the new law, entitled, Homeland Defense Technology Transfer Legislative Provisions, authorizes the Secretary of Defense to create a Homeland Defense Technology Transfer Consortium to improve the effectiveness of the Department of Defense (DOD) processes for identifying and deploying relevant DOD technology to federal, State, and local first responders.(25)

LAPD Swat Logo Militarized Police Militarized Police Militarized Police

"In other words, the law facilitates the 'transfer' of the newest in so-called 'crowd control' technology and other weaponry designed to suppress dissent from the Pentagon to local militarized police units.  The new law builds on and further codifies earlier 'technology transfer' agreements, specifically the 1995 DOD-Justice Department memorandum of agreement achieved back during the Clinton-Reno regime."(25)(26)

Still Think There Is No Police State?

Then watch this video of a lone woman in a skirt and heels, who is wearing a red jacket and carrying a sign that says 'Fear Totalitarianism' as she is maliciously shot in the back and leg with rubber bullets by some members of the SWAT (Special Weapons And Tactics) 'para-military' police as they apply excessive and unwarranted force.

Then as she crouches down behind her sign they shoot her again in the head, just above her eyes.  Watch as the commander of the police laughs and jokes with the men about shooting her in the head, as if it is some kind of macho joke.

She was protesting the use of excessive force during a free trade protest.  Catch the irony there?  What has happened to those who once were to 'protect and defend' We the People?  Encouraged by our federal government, they have turned on us with a police state mentality.  Shameful and terrifying . . . right here in America.

Militarized Police

FBI Informs Local Police To Watch Out For 'Defenders' of US Constitution:

FBI Brochures, printed at taxpayer expense to inform law enforcement how to define when the 'Joint Terrorism Task Force' is to be notified.  For example:  "Groups or individuals operating entirely inside the US, attempting to influence the US government or population to effect political or social change by engaging in criminal activity'."  Where criminal activity is listed as being:  "Right-Wing Extremists [who are] 'defenders' of US Constitution against federal government and the UN (Super Patriots) - Groups of individuals engaged in para-military training . . . Hate Groups:  [such as] Christian Identity and White Nationalists."

How does one 'defend' the Constitution AGAINST the federal government when THEY are sworn to 'protect and defend' that same Constitution?  Isn't that an oxymoron?

Does the 'para-military training' include Constitutionally permitted militias?  It doesn't say.  'White Nationalists' what does that mean, anybody who is white and believes in national sovereignty?  'Christian Identity' . . . does that mean anybody that identifies themselves as a Christian?(28)

A 'Police State' In Action ~ With Mockery To Boot!

Sunrise, Florida Police

Sunrise, Florida Police

Sunrise Police Officer who violated the civil rights of volunteers for the Florida4Marriage.org amendment last summer."(29)(30)(31)

"In June of 2006, Florida Family Policy Council staff members and volunteers were collecting petitions for the Florida Marriage Protection Amendment as a paid exhibitor under a tent with several other ministries at a Promise Keepers Conference in Sunrise, Florida.  What began as a productive day of distributing information and collecting petitions turned into a constitutional showdown when several officers from the Sunrise Police Department showed up and shut down the gathering of petitions . . .  Approximately 21,000 more petitions are needed to reach the required 611,009 petitions to place the amendment on the 2008 ballot."(29)(30)(31)

"The officer in charge, Sergeant Stephen Allen, took it upon himself to lecture the petition collectors on Jesus' view of homosexuality and the Bible's instruction to obey authorities, all the while refusing to produce the legal basis for denying the volunteers' right to collect petitions for Florida4Marriage.org.  To add insult, after removing the Florida4Marriage.org petitions from the exhibit table, Sgt. Allen mockingly kissed another male officer."(29)(30)(31)

Any 'light bulbs' going off yet?

The Florida4Marriage organization needs approximately 21,000 more signed petitions in order to reach the required 611,009 petitions necessary to place the amendment on the 2008 ballot.  If you live in Florida, you might want to help them out by signing the petition as a way to cast your vote against the police state.(31)

Law Enforcement Condones Sedition While Terrorizing Ordinary Americans . . .

Why is it that millions of illegal alien reconquista rabble can march in our streets and shout from the rooftops their seditious plans to take over the southwest and kick out the white Europeans, and our government does nothing.  But if you happen to be a Veterans Administration nurse, who wrote a letter to an editor complaining about the Iraq War, and the government's handling of Hurricane Katrina, she gets investigated for sedition.  That's a fact of life today, here in America.(32)

Then there is George Barisich who lost everything in Katrina, his business, his home . . . while at the same time his extended family "lost 14 of their 17 houses in St. Bernard," Louisiana.  Barisich was ticketed after six DHS security officers surrounded him in his vehicle on a Wal-Mart parking lot for giving away a T-shirt which said:  "Flooded by Katrina!  Forgotten by FEMA!  What's Next, Mr. Bush?"  The parking lot was considered 'federal property' because there was a FEMA center located elsewhere on it.  Barisich was there picking up canned goods from a charity relief tent.(33)

Jan Hall Or . . . Jan Hall an Orange County Florida, Sadler Elementary School teacher who wrote a letter to her congressman that was confiscated by someone who translated it and had it published in the Spanish language newspaper El Nuevo Dia to incite hate and anger against her.  You can find the original handwritten letter here:  (34)

As a result, Jan Hall was immediately suspended without pay, and threatened with loss of her teaching license after 33 years of teaching.

All this was done before a thorough investigation and in violation of her civil rights.  Ms. Hall is now pursuing a $20 million dollar lawsuit against the school and its administration stating:  " . . . you nevertheless, chose to use her exercise of these clearly protected Constitutional rights as grounds to suspend her without pay, to publicly disparage and humiliate her, to demonize her in the Greater Orlando community . . ."(35)

Unfortunately today, it takes a law suit to preserve your constitutional rights.

Oregon Trooper Tramples The First Amendment . . .

A man by the name of Brownlow, a former campaign worker for Mary Starrett who ran for Governor of Oregon in the 2006 election, "was standing on the sidewalk, with his wife and 12-year old daughter, adjacent to a Portland mall, peacefully holding up a sign that read "SUPPORT OUR TROOPS -- BRING THEM HOME!"  Brownlow's son, Jared, is currently serving with the US Army in Baghdad, making this a personal as well as political action."(36)

According to Brownlow:  "While they displayed their sign to passing motorists, Trooper Ken Moore saw the family, sped up to the scene, and stopped in the street in front of the small sidewalk demonstration . . .  The visibly agitated trooper then got out of his patrol vehicle and began shouting at us claiming that we were 'breaking the law,' and demanded that we put away the sign and 'leave the area immediately'. . . "(36)

He goes on to say that:  "'My wife, Suzanne, and I were peaceably exercising our constitutional right of free speech and assembly during an Iraqi war demonstration, and here I was being threatened with imprisonment by a police officer obviously angry about my position on the Iraq war,' explained Brownlow. "(36)

"Surprisingly, . . . when he asked what law was being broken by him and his family, Trooper Moore replied, 'When a trooper tells you that you are breaking the law, that is all you need to know'."(36)

" . . . Brownlow, a savvy political activist, demanded to know what law or ordinance was being broken at which point Trooper Moore jumped over the traffic barrier onto the sidewalk and shouted directly into Mr. Brownlow's face that, 'It was enough to be told the law was being broken, and that if you did not move immediately, you will be arrested'."  There is more . . . you can read the rest of the story here:  (36)

Preaching 'God's Word' Can Get You 47 Years In Jail . . .

"Oct. 10, [2004] a group of 11 Christians was "preaching God's Word" to a crowd of people attending the Philadelphia 'OutFest' event and displaying banners with biblical messages.  After a confrontation with a group called the Pink Angels, described by protesters as 'a militant mob of homosexuals,' the Christians were arrested and spent a night in jail. . .  None of the Pink Angels was cited or arrested."(37)

"After a preliminary hearing in December, Judge William Austin Meehan ordered four of the Christians to stand trial on three felony and five misdemeanor charges. . .  Eight charges were filed:  criminal conspiracy, possession of instruments of crime [a bullhorn], reckless endangerment of another person, ethnic intimidation, riot, failure to disperse, disorderly conduct and obstructing highways.  If convicted, each could have received a maximum of 47 years in prison."(37)

"The ethnic intimidation charge stems from Pennsylvania's 'hate crimes' law – to which the newest 'victim' category of 'sexual orientation' was recently added.  The protesters say a Philadelphia police officer told them that because they were on a public sidewalk they were permitted to move freely through the event.  A few minutes later, however, they were arrested and removed."(38)

"Responding to the riot charge, the [Christian] group's statement said:  'Despite the fact that our behavior was above reproach and we were attacked by a mob of whistle-blowing, obscenity-screaming God haters, the Christians, and only the Christians, were charged'."(39)

Fortunately, for the Christians, an independent videographer by the name of Shaw had made a videotape of the confrontation, which is available online which "was used by the protesters' lawyers during the preliminary hearing.  There likely would not have been a taped record of the Christians' arrest had Shaw not have been in Philadelphia to interview Marcavage [the leader of the Christian protest who fortunately was wearing a wireless mike during the event].  'The footage is telling the truth,' he explained.  'It's very unbiased because we were not there for Repent America [the Christian group] . . . '."(40)

The brave and honorable "Judge Pamela Dembe of the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas dismissed the charges, saying that she found no basis whatsoever for any of them."  Unfortunately, there are not many like her on the bench today.(37)

Be Afraid America . . . be VERY afraid!

As of April 26, 2007, "A fast-tracked congressional plan to add special protections for homosexuals to federal law would turn 'thoughts, feeling, and beliefs' into criminal offenses and put Christians in the bull's-eye . . .  The proposal has been endorsed by majority Democrats on the committee, and already has 137 sponsors in the full House, making it possible it could be voted on in a matter of days or weeks."(41)

Update: It did pass the House the first week of May 2007.  HR 1492 imposes a longer sentence on a criminal motivated by hate than someone who commits exactly the same crime.  It can lead to "federal censorship of religious or political speech on the grounds that the speech incites hate".  Hate crime laws have been used to silence free speech.(42)

According to Ron Paul:  "Hate crime laws not only violate the First Amendment, they also violate the Tenth Amendment.  Under the Constitution there are only three federal crimes:  piracy, treason, and counterfeiting.  All other criminal matters are left to the individual states.  Any federal legislation dealing with criminal matters not related to these three issues usurps state authority over criminal law and takes a step toward turning the states into mere administrative units of the federal government."(42)

The president claims he will veto it. We shall see.

SPP Logo NAFTA Flag NAFTA Flag

How They Are Implementing The End Of America's Sovereignty . . .

The tri-lateral cabal consisting of President Fox, Prime Minister Martin, and President Bush have used NAFTA as a vehicle to create the Trojan horse called the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) which was officially announced on March 23, 2005, in Waco, Texas.  By design . . . the plan was little noticed when it was formally announced.

In the course of thirteen years, the 1994 NAFTA 'trade agreement' has cost millions of American jobs and closed many of our manufacturing plants.  It was an ignominious day for America when the heads of state from three sovereign countries (Mexico, Canada and America) could simply mutually agree to deviously pervert the NAFTA agreement to create the North American Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP).  They have arbitrarily and tri-laterally redefined NAFTA, into what some have called 'NAFTA on steroid's or 'NAFTA plus' and created a deliberately monstrous, slick, crafty, and diabolical Trojan horse.(43)(44)(45)

Having made their official tri-lateral agreement and announcement, President Bush believed he was then entitled to order the Executive Branch of our government to do his bidding.  He has ordered them to create the North American Union (NAU) under cover of the SPP without any oversight by Congress or informing the American public.  Such actions are in violation of our Constitution.  Such acts . . . constitute TREASON!

By presidential fiat, Bush has created "an 'end run' around America's sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece" or in Bush's version . . . 'department by department' which is akin to this famous 'end run' statement made by CFR member Richard Gardner in his 1974 Foreign Affairs article.(79)

Public (Gov't) + Private (Corporate) Partnerships = Fascism, Pushed by the White House . . .

President George W. Bush, center, attends the Security and Prosperity Partnership meeting with Mexico's President Vicente Fox, right, and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, left, Friday, March 31, 2006 at the Fiesta Americana Condesa Cancun Hotel in Cancun, Mexico.  White House photo by Eric Draper Bush has also created, engaged and promoted the North American Competitiveness Council (NACC).  What is their mission and goal?  "INCREASING PRIVATE SECTOR ENGAGEMENT in the SPP by adding high-level BUSINESS INPUT will ASSIST GOVERNMENTS in enhancing North America's competitive position and ENGAGE THE PRIVATE SECTOR AS PARTNERS IN FINDING SOLUTIONS."(46)

Who ARE Those Being 'Engaged' In The 'Private Sector'?

Wealthy corporate globalists who have created for themselves a corporate club sanctioned by the president called the North American Competitiveness Council (NACC) whose charter members are:  Campbell Soup - Chevron - Ford - FedEx - GE - General Motors - Kansas City Southern (rail) - Merck - Mittal Steel - NY Life - Procter & Gamble - UPS - Wal-Mart - Whirlpool along with the Carnegie, Ford, and Rockefeller foundations, all of which are working in concert with those in positions of power in our courts, military, and government.(47)

Working along side of the 'Competitiveness Council' is the Council of the Americas which is ANOTHER of the Rockefeller founded and run organizations working to create the future Americas Union or AU just as soon as they get finished creating the NAU.  These people HATE competition.  They ALL want a MONOPOLY.  They want total and complete control of whatever industry they represent.  Ergo their name . . . One World Monopolists.  They are the 'robber barons' of yore in modern sheep's clothing who pretend it is all about 'competitiveness when it is actually about the complete opposite.  They're driving and striving for world dominion.  That is their ultimate goal.  Read about how they are busily plotting and planning to create the AU, the Americas Union, here:  (48)

They will roll out the AU just as soon as they accomplish the NAU.  They are so entrenched, well funded and embedded in our government that they can be working for decades on their world monopolies before We the People even have a clue about what they are up to.

The Canadian Business Leaders Are Just As Corrupt

As for the 'harmonization' of our regulatory laws, the "Canadian Business Leaders Speak" on the issue of "National And Global Perspectives" and state:  "A better regulatory framework will also mean greater innovation as companies invest in new platforms, services and features knowing that market forces, NOT REGULATION, will determine outcomes.(49)

"The initial SPP agenda included some 300 different items.  Many of those items represented small steps that individually would not have much impact.  Taken together, even 300 small steps add up to a pretty giant leap for North America."(50)

Treason Abounds . . .

Many of those who are traitorously working to erase America's sovereignty, are members of the CFR, the Trilateral Commission, the Rockefeller's Council of the Americas, and attend the Bilderberg conferences and the Bohemian Grove gatherings.  Their overarching desire is to create a world controlled by corporate monopolies . . . a totalitarian plutocracy where the government is whatever THEY say it is.  Their goals are rooted in the ideologies of socialism, Communism, and Marxism all of which are totalitarian ideologies.  Collectively, they are working diligently and secretly, evolving as a FASCIST government, whose ultimate goal is a One World Monopoly which they propagandize as the 'New World Order'.

Lou Dobbs wanted to know why CFR member Robert Pastor, "an out-of-control elitist" who was "not elected or appointed to do a darn thing" can be so intimately involved in working to create the NAU.  Pastor speaks about creating a continental border at the northern border of Canada and the southern border of Mexico.  He also calls for a common external tariff.  Pastor says the that the three countries have no interest nor are they looking to combine into one, which of course is a BLATANT LIE!  He says that those who say the One World Monopolists are working to create the North American Union . . . are 'conspiracists!'

Ron Paul Ron Paul says that such quasi-treaty issues shouldn't be turned over to the Executive Branch.  What is being done is in violation of the Constitution and a usurpation of the duties of Congress.  A STRICT Constitutionalist, Ron Paul, is one of ten 2008 Presidential candidates.  He was the 'hands down' winner of the first Presidential Debate in May 2007 at a MSNBC media event which took place at the Reagan Library in California.  A composite video of his strong, unflinching responses can be viewed here.

Virgil Goode Another patriot is Virgil Goode who has put forth a resolution to stop the SPP and NAU.  You can watch a four minute Lou Dobbs video where he slams the CFR and the NAU plans to a fair-thee-well.

These globalists are seeking to incrementally transform our system of governance so that we are moving from the system of representative government set forth in the U.S. Constitution to a system of collaborative policymaking by professional bureaucrats and business leaders.  To understand how vast and complete the corporatists and the government have formed their fascist 'partnership' go here to read how the North American Competitiveness Council is creating a fascist state that will control your life.  Be sure to wear your propaganda 'hip boots' as you 'wade' through the information.

Homeland Security

Treason ALSO Abounds In The Department of Homeland Security on Chertoff's Orders . . .

According to our president and the spp.gov website . . . the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) is 'just a dialog' and yet it is never discussed in the media.  Why is that?  Isn't it important enough?  Or, do they have something to hide?  The SPP is in fact MUCH, MUCH, more than they let on or tell us about as discovered from an initialed memorandum by Michael Chertoff, covering the 'Implementation of the Security and Prosperity Partnership', dated September 22, 2005 obtained by Judicial Watch under FOIA (Freedom Of Information Act).(51)

Tom Fitton Suspiciously, and according to Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch who filed the FOIA request:  "Unlike previous records produced by other federal agencies, the DHS records are heavily redacted to withhold the names of the US, Mexican and Canadian government officials carrying out the partnership's agenda across all three countries."(51)

Michael Chertoff Michael Chertoff Michael Chertoff Chertoff & Bush

What Is Chertoff Hiding By His 'Heavily Redacted' Documents?

According to Michael Chertoff:  "DHS-led U.S.-Canada and U.S.-Mexico groups already in existence will take on the SPP actions within their scope.  Moreover, in several cases, new groups will need to be established.  That said, the SPP has, in addition to identifying a number of new action items, comprehensively rolled up most of our existing homeland security-related policy initiatives with Canada and Mexico (see note 2 below), and ongoing action and reporting in the various U.S.-Canada and U.S.-Mexico working groups led by DHS should now [be] driven by a single agenda:  the SPP.  Henceforth, any U.S.-Canada, U.S.-Mexico briefing materials should -- instead of referring to preexisting actions items -- refer to the SPP agenda."(52)

"Note 2:  The 32-point Ridge-Manley Accords, the DHS-Public Safety Emergency Preparedness Canada (PSEPC) Action Plan and the U.S.-Canada Public Security Technical Program with Canada; the 22-point Border Partnership Action Plan, the 16-point Short Term Action Plan with Mexico and the U.S.-Mexico Memorandum of Understanding on Repatriation.  Key elements, of DOJ-led law enforcement efforts, such as the Cross Border Crime Forum with Canada and Senior Law Enforcement Plenary with Mexico, have also been included in the SPP."(52)

Isn't it disturbing to know that we work together with the Senior Law Enforcement officers from Mexico, many of whom are known to be corrupt and working with people involved in drug running and human trafficking?  What do they learn from us that might compromise our security?  Who knows?

What are the 'working groups' working on?  Why is there no information in the media about their 'workings'?  Why do they have secret meetings in Banff, Canada where no media is permitted?  What's going on behind our backs?

Most revealing is the fact that MANY in our House and Senate have dismissed the fact that Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) is a mechanism for creating the North American Union as an internet conspiracy theory.  Are they lying?  Are they stupid?  Are they willfully turning a blind eye?  Are they part of the cabal?  Or . . . all of the above?

Lastly, it is quite interesting that the "term homeland was used in the 1930s to describe a position of the Austrian Minister Zernatto who negotiated terms with the Nazis.  Today homeland is a Russian political party and is also used to describe all of Russia.  In 2002, Republican speechwriter Peggy Noonan wrote , "The name Homeland Security grates on a lot of people, understandably. Homeland isn't really an American word, it's not something we used to say or say now."(53)

By now, you should understand that they are traitorously working behind the scenes to bring forth the North American Union in EXACTLY the same way they did it in Europe.  They are using lies, deception, doublespeak, secret meetings behind closed doors, and by applying the tool of incremental stealth as they network with 'ministers' from two incompatible foreign countries all the while, day in and day out . . . re-writing our regulatory laws, all without Congressional review or discussion . . . in VIOLATION OF OUR CONSTITUTION.  That is TREASON!
Carlos Gutierrez Bernier, Gutierrez & Garcia de Alba
Carlos M. Gutierrez - U.S. Secretary of Commerce(54) Canadian Minister of Industry Maxime Bernier, U.S. Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez, and Mexican Economy Minister Sergio García de Alba(54)
More NAU Stealth Uncovered By World Net Daily FOIA Requests . . .

"The State Department communiqué, dated May 20, 2005, documents a March 13, 2005, meeting between [Dept. of Commerce Secretary Carlos] Gutierrez, Mexican Secretary of EconomyFernando Canales and Canadian Privy Council Assistant Secretary Phil Ventura.  The meeting was held just prior to the announcement of SPP at the trilateral summit with the country's three leaders in Waco, Texas, March 23, 2005."(55)

"The cable notes Gutierrez opened the discussion by stressing that the July 23, 2005, "Report to Leaders" needed 'to show results' that would be 'enduring and create an on-going process'."(55)

"The document quotes Canada's Ventura as stating that the three countries should prepare a joint document declaring their trilateral intention to 'integrate'a list of industries, including automobiles, pharmaceuticals, textiles, furniture, and steel," he argued.  "Ventura said the more 'trilateral integrated' industries that could be listed, the better."(55)

"At the meeting, Gutierrez proposed that the SPP ministers think in terms of a trilateral "integrated" auto industry creating a "Made in North America Vehicle by 2009."  He also suggested announcing "an IPR (Intellectual Property Rights) Violation Free Zone by 2010" and that SPP ministers should hold weekly conference calls to advance the agenda."(55)

Howard Phillips, who has formed a coalition to block the NAU stated:  "The economic route being pursued behind closed doors by SPP working groups is a replay of the exact stealth route taken in Europe . . ."(55)

Are You Prepared To Have Your Vitamins Called . . . DRUGS?

"The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Federal Trade Commission have agreed to a Trilateral Cooperation Charter with counterparts in Canada and Mexico under the auspices of NAFTA and the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America that will crack down on public access to food supplements and vitamins. "(56)

According to John Hammell of International Advocates for Health Freedom:  "A key goal of the Trilateral Cooperation Charter is to limit the public's access to food supplements and vitamins that are fundamental to many types of alternative medicine, . . .  The Trilateral Cooperation Charter is determined to attack the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 [DSHEA] by moving to merge [harmonize] our food and drug regulations with those of Canada and Mexico, both of whom . . . define dietary supplements as 'DRUGS', not food supplements."(56)

"A similar controversy has raged over the regulation of food supplements in the European Union.  In 2002, the EU issued a controversial Food Supplements Directive that has been used to regulate food supplements as well as labeling and marketing of vitamins and minerals in food supplements.  The European Court of Justice already has decided . . . [that the] directive was valid under European Union law."(56)

"Hammell believes that the Trilateral Cooperation Charter reflects a globalist desire to advance the interests of the large pharmaceutical companies by reining in the food supplements industry worldwide.  He points to efforts such as the Codex Alimentarius Commission that was created in 1963 by the Food and Agricultural Organization and the World Health Organization [WHO] both official groups within the United Nations [and that the] FDA has a long history of attacking dietary supplements on behalf of the large corporate pharmaceutical interests the agency traditionally protects."(56)

You MUST view this Codex Alimentarius video, narrated by Dame Judi Dench, covering vitamin regulatory laws that are being targetd for 'harmonization' which is titled:  We Become Silent: The Last Days of Health Freedom (28:37 minutes) detailing "the ongoing attempts by multinational pharmaceutical interests and giant food companies -- in concert with the WTO, the WHO and others -- to limit the public's access to herbs, vitamins and other therapies."(57)

EU Regulations Are Subject To Being Overruled By the WTO:

Poison Emblem "According to expert scientists appointed by the European Union, the use of growth hormones in food animals poses a potential risk to consumers' health.  The scientists reported that hormone residues found in meat from these animals can disrupt the consumer's hormone balance, cause developmental problems, interfere with the reproductive system, and even lead to the development of cancer; . . ."(58)

"As a result of these health risks, the European Union has banned the use of substances having a hormonal action for growth promotion in farm animals, and has prohibited the import of hormone-treated beef since 1988 . . . "(58)

"The US and Canada contested the prohibition and in 1997 a panel of the WTO ruled that the EU measure was not in line with the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS) . . ."(58)

In other words they were overruled by the WTO.  Do you want to have the WTO overruling our Supreme Court?  They will be able to under the 'treaty' agreements that are being signed and enforced without the Senate's Constitutionally mandated two-thirds vote.

Secrecy Abounds at Banff Meeting . . . 'Evolution By Stealth'

Banff, Canada, September, 2006 hosted a meeting on "Border Infrastructure and Continental Prosperity" at the North American Forum.  Attending was a well known foe of the NAU by the name of Mel Hurtig, who said . . .  "What is sinister about this meeting is that it involved high level government officials and some of the top and most powerful business leaders of the three countries and the North American Forum in organizing the meeting intentionally did not inform the press in any of the three countries . . ."(59)

DorisMeissner Donald Rumsfeld George Shultz
Doris Meissner Donald Rumsfeld George Shultz

Notes of the meeting obtained by Judicial Watch under a FOIA found the revealing notation of 'evolution by stealth' on them.  Some of the documents it received were from the "U.S. Northern Command, whose commander, Admiral Timothy Keating, participated in the conference along with Northcom political adviser Deborah Bolton and Plans, Policy and Strategy Director Maj. General Mark Volcheff.  A similar request concerning participation in the North American Forum meeting by former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is still pending."(59)

The emphasis at the meeting was on the "importance of 'deepening economic integration,' 'integrating the energy infrastructure' and 'the development of new institutions' between the three North American nations.  Note the 'code' words highlighted.  "Participants promoted the idea of using popular issues, such as concern over climate change, to push integration of energy and environmental governance and the possibility of imposing a carbon tax."(59)

"Confirmed participants included . . . former Secretary of State George Shultz, who serves as co-chairman of the North American Forum, former Central Intelligence Agency Director R. James Woolsey, former Immigration and Naturalization Services Director Doris Meissner, North American Union guru Robert Pastor, former Defense Secretary William Perry, former Energy Secretary and Defense Secretary James Schlesinger and top officials of both Mexico and Canada.  But the only media member was . . .Wall Street Journal's Mary Anastasia O'Grady."(59)

Just who ARE these 'top officials' from Mexico, Canada and America who were redacted from the FOIA documents?  Why were they removed?  What does DHS have to hide?  Why the secrecy?  What has happened here in America that there are SECRET meetings?  A FRIGHTENING current example of totalitarianism!

"The event was organized by the Canadian Council of Chief Executives and the Canada West Foundation, an Alberta think-tank that promotes closer economic integration with the United States.  The next meeting of the North American Forum is set for Oct. 12-14 in Puerto Vallarta."(59)

CNN's Lou Dobbs covers the Banff meeting and its 'stealth and secrecy'.  You can watch this video which is 3:49 minutes long and titled:  Lou Dobbs Outs Those Involved in NAU.  Christine Romans reports and Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch discusses the results of his FOIA request which discovered the notation of 'evolution by stealth' on the documents which referred to how they are implementing the NAU.

Lou Dobbs

Lou Puts Banff Attendee, and CFR Member, Dr. Robert Pastor On The 'Hot Seat' . . .

Lou Dobbs hammers NAU 'Pied Piper' and elitist Robert Pastor on the stealth movements towards a North American Union that are taking place in secret without Congressional or voter oversight.  He covers the Banff meeting which took place in Canada last September, 2006 after which FOIA documents obtained by Judicial Watch noted that the discussions were about 'evolution by stealth'.  You can view the video here.  It is suggested that you watch this video and pay close attention to the dialog between the two.  The final score: Lou 10 . . . Pastor 0.

The Council of Canadians Uncover ANOTHER NAU Stealth Project:

Canadian Flag "New documents obtained by the Council of Canadians provide damning evidence of how North American integration is being carried out by stealth.  They describe a series of closed-door meetings with government officials and business leaders from Canada, Mexico and the United States to discuss everything from bulk water exports to a joint security perimeter and a continental resource pact, all with the explicit aim of helping executive-level politicians further integrate our three countries."(60)

"Under the title North American Future 2025 Project, the U.S. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), in collaboration with the Conference Board of Canada and Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE), is currently holding a series of 'closed-door roundtable sessions' with government 'practitioners' and private sector 'stakeholders' in order to 'strengthen the capacity of Canadian, U.S., and Mexican administration officials and that of their respective legislatures to analyze, comprehend, and anticipate North American integration' (emphasis ours)."(60)

The One World Monopolists' North American Future 2025 Project Quotes:

"In order to strengthen the capacity of Canadian, U.S., and Mexican administration officials and that of their respective legislatures to analyze, comprehend, and anticipate North American integration, the CSIS North America Project proposes to carry out a series of seven closed-door roundtable sessions. "(61)

"CSIS [Center for Strategic and International Studies] is extremely well positioned to carry out this project successfully, given its longstanding programs on Mexico and Canada as well as those related to North American integration.  Since 1985, the CSIS Mexico Project has been a leader among Washington think tanks in its commitment to sustaining a full-time focus on the study of Mexico."(61)

"The CSIS Mexico Project played a very active role in the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement through the NAFTA and Beyond Commission, which was a high-level commission cosponsored in conjunction with the Carter Center at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia.  More recently, CSIS’s Mexico and Canada Projects have focused on analyzing the process of deepening North American integration—a development that is transforming all three nations and establishing the dynamics of a new continental economy."(61)

"As a complement to its full-time staff, CSIS also benefits from the expertise of CSIS adjunct fellows—highly regarded senior specialists in the field who come from the United States, Mexico, and Canada.  CSIS actively engages these fellows by featuring them at CSIS conferences and commissioning [paying] them to author CSIS publications.  These experts lend further credibility, extend the outreach, and raise the stature of CSIS’s activities and publications in Mexico and Canada."(61)

"[T]he CSIS/Global Strategy Institute’s own long-range forecasts conducted through the Seven Revolutions and Seven Futures Projects.  The North American Future 2025 project will also examine relevant future-looking work dealing with each of the six topics upon which the three governments have agreed—namely, labor mobility, energy, the environment, security, competitiveness, and border infrastructure and logistics."(61)

"The final deliverable will be a report on options and policy recommendations on the future of North American integration that will be presented in September 2007 to the executive and legislative branches of the three governments of North America.  The report will be produced in the three official languages—English, Spanish, and French—as part of an effective dissemination strategy aimed at maximizing the policy impact of the report."(61)

ROUNDTABLE I:  METHODOLOGY OF GLOBAL AND NORTH AMERICAN PROJECTIONS

"The CSIS North America Project will convene pertinent government officials from Canada, the United States, and Mexico, along with selected non-government experts [they mean those 'private' experts from the corporate community] knowledgeable of current global and North American trends [One World Monopolists from all sectors] and experienced in projecting scenarios [they who have been working members of the 'Shadow Government', etc.].  This first roundtable would be akin to a methodology session, in which a select group of project participants will review existing data and make an assessment of current standpoints in key sectors and establish baseline scenarios for each of the six roundtables to follow."(61)

The first half of this roundtable will be dedicated to determining where North America and other global regions currently stand in key sectors, such as trade, demographics, infrastructure, natural resources (that is, energy and water), and science and technology.  Examining current regional and global data will provide a context for the projection scenarios.  The second half of this roundtable will assess existing projection studies and establish a baseline scenario from which to initiate the discussion and make appropriate adjustments prior to delving into the policy recommendations that will constitute part of the discussion at each of the six subsequent roundtables."(61)

Of note is the use of the term 'round table.'  It has a highly significant meaning to the One World Monopolists.  It a 'signature' of their past conspiracies.  It's a 'code word' and slap-in-the-face to those not in the know.  While we think of it only as a table where there is no 'head' and all are equal around the table, the One World Monopolists do NOT!  However, you should know that the physical use of a 'round table' is an identifying label which has been secretly connected to many past groups who have been working for hundreds of years to overthrow sovereign nations.

Waterfall Droplets

Do You Know WHAT Is Being Called . . . 'Blue Gold'?

It's water!  Why are they calling it blue gold?  Because . . . just like its counterpart, black gold (oil), it is seen by the One World Monopolists as something to hoard and monopolize in order to create more wealth, which is why they are now 'investing' in anything that is 'blue'.

It's a 'hot topic' of concern for the western USA . . . they need it . . . and Canada has it.

"Canadian water is on the table at trilateral talks between politicians, businessmen [fascism personified] and academics from Canada, the U.S. and Mexico . .  ."(62)

"A series of closed-door conferences for the North American Future 2025 Project will include the discussion of 'water transfers' and diversions, according to the outline for the project, a trilateral effort to draft a 'blueprint' on economic integration for the governments of Canada, the U.S. and Mexico.  The project was launched by the three governments in March 2006 to help guide the ongoing Security and Prosperity Partnership, a wide-ranging effort to further integrate the countries’ practices on everything from environmental rules to security protocols and border controls.  A draft report will be submitted to the three heads of state at a partnership summit in Alberta this August."(62)

Again more stealth, closed-door conferences, integration, partnerships with the corporate elite and it goes on, and on, and on.  Are you fed up enough to start doing something about the shredding of our Constitution and corrupt, lying politicians who claim they know nothing about it and that it is 'just another internet conspiracy' story?

What Do The Fascist Corporate Elites Want . . .

For YEARS the CFR has been calling for the erasure of our borders.  Dr. Pastor, a CFR 'task force' Vice-Chair, has been trumpeting the NAU concept, just about everywhere it mattered, including several invitations to speak before our Congress.  The One World Monopolists are working secretly to achieve the CFR's stated goal of a North American Union, while 'We the People' and Congress are 'left out of the loop.'  There was a Lou Dobbs video in which Pastor is seen boldly announcing the CFR's plans to eliminate our borders by 2010.  Unfortunately that particular video been removed from the internet.  Anyone who has that video in their possession and would like to share it with this author, that would be much appreciated.

The Shadow Government's planned elimination of our borders would explain the administration's non-closure of the border and the DELIBERATE non-enforcement of our immigration laws as well as DHS' insane policy of 'catch and release' and the persecution and prosecution of Ramos and Compean and other borders patrol agents.  Such actions or rather non-actions and other inexplicable policies were, and are, being purposefully employed to create the de facto elimination of our borders . . .a major prerequisite for creating the North American Union.

Follow the trail of the Pied Piper of the North American Union as he gains entree to those in high office in our government, by invitation to appear before them to discuss his plan for the North American Community, which he euphemistically calls the North American UNION!  The following four citations are the 'invited testimony' given by Pastor:  (63)(64)(65)(66)

Lastly, Dr. Robert A. Pastor, the 'Pied Piper' of the North American Union.  Who is he?  For years, he has been a consistent, unappointed and unelected shill for the One World Monopolists.  He is a CFR member who is David Rockefeller's 'front man' doing the bidding of the Shadow Government.  His pre-college past is shrouded in mystery since there is no information about him that covers the time from his birth to his university days.  Why does he have such an exceptional entrée to the highest levels of governance in light of the fact that he has Marxist connections and associates?  That is the question.

And Yet There Is A Conundrum . . .

Even though Pastor has appeared before our Congress, many in our government, consisting of supposedly intelligent and well educated Senators and House members, say they have no clue about the coming NAU?  Many of those, whom we have elected, say that is just an 'internet rumor' or simply more of those 'conspiracy theories'.  Why is that?  You don't suppose they are part of the plan to deceive and cover-up, do you?

CFR Members In Oval Office (67)
Some Of The Cabal

Note:  14 of the 17 policymakers in the picture currently belong to the Council on Foreign Relations (cfr.org).  Two others, Rumsfeld (currently a member of the Trilateral Commission) and Laird, are former members of the CFR.  Of the 17, George W. Bush himself is the only one who has not belonged to the organization, but he is a member of the 'Skull and Bones', another of the One World Monopolists' organizations where you find members of the elite cabal.

Starting on the left:  Former Secretary of Defense Harold Brown, former Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger, former Secretary of State James Baker, former Secretary of State Colin Powell, former Secretary of Defense James Schlesinger, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, Vice President Dick Cheney, President George W. Bush, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, former Secretary of State George Shultz, former Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird, former Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara, former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, former Secretary of State Alexander Haig, former Secretary of Defense Frank Carlucci, former Secretary of Defense William Perry, and former Secretary of Defense William Cohen.

The CFR and hundreds its of members have infiltrated our government at all levels . . . the legislative, the executive, the courts, and the military.  They are the driving force and facilitators behind the CFR's publicly stated position that says the following:  "An annual summit of North American leaders would do more to carry out our [CFR's] overall goal of creating a North American Community than virtually any of the report’s other recommendations.  As we have seen with the annual Group of Seven/Eight (G-7/8) and Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summits, regular meetings of leaders not only help promote a sense of community and shared objectives, but channel the various bureaucracies each year to work on those common objectives."(68)

"Whether on matters of security, education, or economic integration and development, annual summits will drive a process that will hasten the goals that we outline in our report.  More to the point, an annual summit can be announced and implemented right away, giving tangible impetus to the good beginning made at the March 2005 summit and to the goals we promote here."(68)

Get the picture?

The CFR had reason to rejoice because:  "At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action.  We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts."(68)

Although there are those who would deny there is ANY connection between the CFR and the creation of the Security and Prosperity Partnership as a vehicle for creating the North American Union, they are simply in severe denial, dupes, or part of the cabal that is working to cover up the truth.

Watch this video, as the Vice-President of the United States of America, laughs about the hiding his membership in the CFR while campaigning for office in Wyoming.  Information about David Rockefeller's evil empire is also revealed in this quick, less than two minute, video.


European Union Flag United StatesFlag NAFTA Flag Girl With Flag


The EU Blueprint . . . How They Will Use It To Take Over America . . .

The One World Monopolists are well aware that they can simply ignore the will of the people and do whatever they want, because that's exactly how they did it in Europe.  Did you know that even though the French and the Dutch people have rejected ratifying the EU Constitution, the oligarchs are going ahead with the final phase of the EU anyway?  The only difference between Europe's status and our NAU is that we are 'on to them' and, unlike Europe, we are not yet 'locked in' and can fight to stop them before it's a done deal.

"It's full steam ahead for the EU constitution, even after 'No' votes.  You may have gotten the impression that the European constitution was dead - the French had felled it, and the Dutch had pounded a stake through its heart.  If so, think again.  The constitution is being implemented, clause by clause, as if the No votes had not happened. . . .  Formal ratification by all 25 states is regarded in Brussels as a technicality.  To all intents and purposes the EU is carrying on as though the constitution were already in force.  Most of the institutions that it would have authorised are either up and running already, or in the process of being established."(69)

At The Signing of the EU Constitution, The People of Europe Were Told A LIE . . .

The Signing of the European Constitution (Reuters)

"Belgian Prime Minister Guy Verhofstadt (L) and Foreigner Minister Karel De Gucht sign the EU Constitution in the 'Orazi and Curiazi' hall at the Campidoglio, the political and religious centre of ancient Rome, today home of Rome's city hall, October 29, 2004."(70)

"The treaty was the result of 28 months of sometimes acrimonious debate between the 25 EU governments and now faces ratification in national parliaments.  At least nine EU nations also plan to put it to a referendum, increasing chances that it may not take effect in 2007 as scheduled."(70)

The Europeans were told the following LIE:  "A 'NO' result in ANY country would stop the constitution in its tracks."(70)

But will it?  Read on to see how they are handling the French and Dutch's rejection of the Constitution's ratification . . .

Blair's Solution ~ 'No European Constitution Needed' . . .

Because of Britain's 'widespread euroskepticism', they would likely follow suit with a similar 'No' vote on the EU constitution.  As such, "UK's Blair says no European constitution needed . . .  Blair's spokesman said an amending treaty would not require a referendum 'in the same way that for the last 50 years other treaties of the kind that we're envisaging haven't needed a referendum'."(71)

And THAT, is exactly how they have created the EU.  They simply go ahead and do whatever, whenever, and however they 'envisage' it to be done.  That is the methodology they are applying here to create the NAU.

As you can see those 'no' votes didn't deter the One World Monopolists.  They simply forge onward without permission even after TWO 'no' votes.  They finally realized that the people were waking up to reality and they had lost control.  But never fear . . . the elite plutocracy just simply shrugs and continues on as if those bothersome peasants were irrelevant.  That's their typical modus operandi.  That is EXACTLY what they will do here.

Tony Blair

Then there was German chancellor Angela Merkel's achievement of a deal for the Berlin declaration on the EU's future.  However . . . "MEPS from left and right criticized the German chancellor for running negotiations on the wording of the text behind closed doors."

Graham Watson, the chairman of the Liberals, said:  "A text drafted in the catacombs of the Bundeskanzleramt and signed by the presidents of the three European institutions should not have the temerity to start with ‘we the peoples of European union’ . . . "

"Merkel defended the text, saying the declaration is an interinstitutional commitment to undertake much-needed reforms on the European institutions."  She said:  “The world will not wait for Europe.  We are responsible to bring Europe to the forefront of world events”, she said, adding that "the precondition for this is the capacity for the EU to act decisively"."(72)

Three people get to sign on behalf of the 27 countries in the EU including the ELEVEN 'states' of ' we the peoples of the European Union' who have not ratified the EU Constitution.


How the Plutocratic Oligarchy Rules in the EU . . .
Plutocracy:  Government of the wealthy, by the wealthy, for the wealthy. Oligarchy:  Rule of the many by the few.

The following videos reveal the progression of the EU to complete the takeover of Britian and all other EU countries by denying them the right to ratify the EU Constitution.  Pay attention, because it is EXACTLY how they will do it here.

First you should know that the EU Constitution is a redux of the Soviet Russian Constitution which came straight out of the Communist Manifesto.  The EU Consitution was agreed upon in 2004 and then all 27 countries were to vote for its ratification.  If there was ONE 'no' vote, then the Constitution was to be redrawn and then ratified.  At that time only NINE countries had planned to allow ratification by the people.

What happened next was that France and the Netherlands BOTH voted 'NO'!  At that point only about HALF the European countries had voted to ratify.  So what did the EU's unelected and unaccountable leaders do?  They just went ahead anyway.  They did just what Tony Blair said they would do, they would simply amend one of the six prior treaties to accept the EU Consitituion WITHOUT ratification.  What IN FACT they did do was create the 'Lisbon Treaty' FINAL ACT, which was signed

If you still do not understand that the evolution of a World Totalitarian Police State is underway then you need to watch ALL the videos in this section to learn what is going on in your own backyard, town, city, state and federal government.

In the EU, the Dutch and the French said 'NO' to the EU Consitution, after which Tony Blair said, 'no problem' we will just circumvent the REQUIRED and AGREED UPON re-negotiation of the Constitution by adding an addendum to the already signed treaties.  To keep 'blowback' to a minimum, the EU oligarchy created a new treaty, called the Lisbon Treaty and left OUT the word 'Constitution' then eliminated the people from the ratification process.

This video demonstrates how the Plutocratic Oligarchy of the EU 'remote controls' Britain in MANY venues.  Quite a good description of how England is being bankrupted by the EU.  Pay attention because the 'bankruptcy' tactic is a method that is being used here in America:  watch video >>  (21minutes)

To understand HOW the EU's unelected and unaccountable plutocratic oligarchy runs the EU, you MUST watch this video on the Lisbon Treaty: Treaty Completes the EU Takeover ~ Ending ALL European Nations:  watch video >>  (82 minutes)

A great speech given before the EU parliament by the British MEP Nigel Farage, lambasting the deceptive Lisbon Treaty as being, in FACT, an EU Constitution and refusing to allow the people the right of a RATIFICATION vote.  It is TOTALITARIANISM in full dress:  The END OF NATIONS - EU Takeover By Deception:  watch video >>  (3+ minutes)

The MEP's rowdy revolt in the EU Parliament after the EU voted to quash the right of the people to have the right to a referendum vote as was promised when the Constitution was drawn up and signed in 2005:  watch video >>  (4 minutes)

EU reprisal for dissenters:  Creeping EU Totalitarianism shows MEP Nigel Farage challenging the reprisals being meted out to the dissenters:  watch video >>  (9+ minutes)

This is an Irish MEPs opposition to the Lisbon Treaty's totalitarian suppression of the right of the people to vote on a referendum.  Our last chance, Ireland, Say NO to Lisbon Treaty:  watch video >>  (10 Minutes)

June 12, 2008 . . . The Irish vote NO!

This is a debate in the EU Parliament about ending the Lisbon Treaty process in light of the Irish 'NO' vote:  watch video >>  (10+ minutes)

The American Version of 'NO' That Is Ignored By The Shadow Gov't . . .

A perfect example of how the One World Monopolists operate here is obvious when 80% of the American people say 'NO' to open borders and the massive illegal alien invasion, and the plutocrats say 'YES' by not sealing off our borders.  They say 'YES' by facilitating the invasion through non-enforcement of our 200 year old immigration laws.  Our government says 'YES' by having sanctuary cities and pathetic, 'for show' immigration round-ups.  To add insult to injury the legal system says 'YES' . . . when the captured illegal aliens go in the front door to be 'booked', and then come out the back laughing their heads off.  Illegal aliens either don't show up for deportation hearings or get a free ride back to Mexico on the taxpayer's dime.  Once there, they simply turn around and sneak back into our country the next day, because they have 'no fear' of reprisal from the law.

The American people say 'NO' to allowing Mexican trucks to haul their loads into America because they don't read or speak English in order to ask questions or read our road signs. They are permitted to ignore our emissions standards, thanks to a US Supreme Court decision.  They are often required to drive for days without sleep to arrive at their destinations on time, so they routinely use drugs to keep awake.  Mexico does not require regular drug testing, nor do they have the facilities to do such testing.  If they keep DOT logs, who is going to verify them?  Do they meet our insurance and registration requirements?  We the People say NO, and yet the Executive Branch's Department of Transportation defiantly says 'YES' even though Mexico has refused to allow the reciprocal entry of American truckers into Mexico in violation of the original NAFTA 'trade' agreement.  Lou Dobbs reports on the Mexican truck invasion, and says he considers it a "straight forward attack on national sovereignty".

Truckers.jpg Mexican Trucks

May 8, 2007, at a luncheon in Mexico City, Mexico which was sponsored by the American Chamber of Commerce, Franklin L. Lavin, the undersecretary for international trade for the United States of America said:  "A pilot program to allow Mexican trucks into all areas of the United States should be in place by July [2007] . . . "(73)

"Access to the U.S. by Mexican trucks has been delayed for years by safety and environmental concerns and resistance from U.S. truckers."(73)

Lavin ran over all those legitimate objections by saying:  "To my mind Mexico has lived up to its responsibility' in addressing safety concerns raised by the U.S. Congress . . .  We fully intend to go ahead with liberalization in July.  So we're on track."(73)

Scary, scary, scary comments . . . he says . . .  'To my mind' with no forthcoming proof that Mexico has complied with the regulatory requirements involving truck safety, criminal background checks, drug testing, validation of CDL driver training and licensing, the ability to speak and read English road signs, etc., or the reciprocation for American drivers to drive their trucks in Mexico.  It doesn't matter because the One World Monopolists 'fully intend to go ahead in July'!

Here Are Some Similarities Between the NAU and Britain Under the EU . . .

The illegal alien invasion provides the One World Monopolist shadow government with a de facto erasure of our borders.  It is the primary reason they remain wide open and why our immigration laws are not enforced.  What better way to slide us into the North American Union.  The unchecked illegal alien invasion is an act of war and requires our 'elected' representatives to violate their oath of office to uphold the constitution, in order to maintain the status quo.  The invasion is creating chaos here, but does our government do their job to stop it?  No, of course not.  Why?  Because they see the invasion as a wonderful MECHANISM for invoking the NAU.

Why else would they be pushing so hard to pass the 'amnesty' legislation?  This diabolical, insane and evil 'comprehensive' legislation will allow the One World Monopolists to make the invasion completely legal.  That way they can dust off their hands and return to their compounds or gated communities while We the People are forced to endure the insanity their greed and debauchery has foisted upon us.

Such governmental insanities are what prompted the following quote from General Douglas MacArthur:  I am concerned for the security of our great nation, not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within.

To Recap . . .

We now know what their plans and methods are, because we have only to look to the EU and examine its workings and history to know EXACTLY what is coming.  Thus, since we have access to that knowledge, we can plan and form our counter-attack for stopping them.

Because of their stealthful European success, the 'Shadow Government' is doing the same thing over here.  They keep all their plotting, planning and actions secretly locked behind closed doors.  They are also illegally denying FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests for their Constitutionally illegal documents exposing such things as the Social Security 'Totalization' agreement, signed by Mexico and the U.S., which took three years of court battles to get.  They are now working at warp speed because they know we are 'on to them' thanks to the internet, talk radio and some independent newspapers who are exposing them.

Pity the people of Britain who thought they were simply joining a 'common market.'  A common market that turned into 111,000 'harmonized' regulations that have destroyed their legal system, sovereignty, and wrested the control of their country from their grasp, in all aspects and venues.  Their Queen is a traitor who, without the consent of the people, signed away their sovereignty and contravened their laws, in violation of their Bill of Rights and Constitution.  The current British government is but a 'puppet' under the control of the unelected and un-accountable European oligarchs who run the EU.  The British people are now left with a political structure that is useless and rife with blatant corruption resulting from the endemic political bribery which is now destroying the very moral fiber of their nation.(7)

Reiterating David Noakes:  "The 111,000 EU regulations will then turn the former nation of Britain into a soviet style command economy, bringing unemployment and poverty to us all. . .  A foreign power, the EU, will then rule us, and enforce the laws of a police state."(7)

Just How Does Our Government Thwart We the People? They LIE!

SPP Logo For example:  They use the SPP.gov website to counter our opposition to the SPP (Security and Prosperity Partnership) by putting out a rebuttal titled SPP Myths vs. Facts which can be found here.  Just scroll down to item number one on their list which states:

Myth:  The SPP was an agreement signed by President Bush and his Mexican and Canadian counterparts in Waco, TX, on March 23, 2005.

Fact:  The SPP is a dialogue to increase security and enhance prosperity among the three countries.  The SPP is NOT an agreement nor is it a treaty.  In fact, no agreement was EVER signed.(74)

Their 'fact' is a BALD-FACED LIE!  It is propaganda in its boldest form.  How do you know?  Because on a Canadian government website there was a five page statement posted and signed by Prime Minister Martin which declares the following:  "on March 23, President Bush, President Fox and I SIGNED the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America that establishes the way forward on our continental agenda for security, prosperity and quality of life."(75)

The above quote can be found on page 2 of 5.  It is the last sentence in the sub-section titled Canada in North America in a document, complete with the signature of PM Paul Martin, which can be found here.

How Long Have The One World Monopolists Been Lying To Us?

At least since 1931 when Arnold Toynbee, a Fabian socialist, Rhodes Round Tabler and court historian for the British Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA), the counterpart to our CFR, spoke before the Conference of Institutions for the Scientific Study of International Affairs, in Copenhagen, on The Trend of International Affairs Since the War.  He took that opportunity to brazenly announce to his fellow globalists:
"If we are frank with ourselves, we shall admit that we are engaged on a deliberate and sustained and concentrated effort to impose limitations upon the sovereignty and independence of the fifty or sixty local sovereign independent States [Nations] which at present partition the habitable surface of the earth and divide the political allegiance of mankind."

Toynbee went on to say,  “It is just because we are really attacking the principle of local sovereignty that we keep on protesting our loyalty to it so loudly.  The harder we press our attack upon the idol, the more pains we take to keep its priests and devotees in a fool’s paradise—lapped in a false sense of security which will inhibit them from taking up arms in their idol’s defense.”

Toynbee then launched into an attack on national sovereignty of the sort reserved for his fellow elitists:  "The local national state, invested with the attributes of sovereignty—is an abomination of desolation standing in the place where it ought not.  It has stood in that place now … for four or five centuries.  Our political task in our generation is to cast the abomination out . . . "

Lastly he said:  "… I will not prophesy.  I will merely repeat that we are at present working, discreetly but with all our might, to wrest this mysterious political force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local national states of our world.  And all the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands, because to impugn the sovereignty of the local national states of the world is still a heresy for which a statesman or a publicist can be—perhaps not quite burnt at the stake, but certainly ostracized and discredited . . ."(76)
Sickening isn't it?

Those Who have Spoken Out About the 'Shadow Government':

"Rear Admiral Chester Ward, USN (Retd.), who was a member of the CFR for sixteen years, has written, 'The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common--They want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the United States."(77)

"Felix Frankfurter, Justice of the Supreme Court (1939-1962) said:  The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes."(78)

Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter
Felix Frankfurter

"In a letter to an associate dated November 21, 1933, President Franklin Roosevelt wrote, The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson."(78)

In a speech given on February 23, 1954, Senator William Jenner warned America:  "Outwardly we have a Constitutional government.  We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government, a bureaucratic elite which believes our Constitution is outmoded."(78)

William Jenner
Senator William Jenner

America is a Constitutional Republic . . . NOT a Democracy

How often have you heard people refer to America as a Democracy?  When was the last time that you heard America referred to as a Republic?  There is a very good reason that our Pledge of Allegiance refers to our country as a Republic and there is a very good reason that our Declaration of Independence and our constitution do not even mentioned the word 'democracy'.

Many people are under the false impression that our form of government is a democracy, which of course we are NOT!  We are a Constitutional Republic which democratically elects our representatives to Congress.  But you would never know that is the case because ALL you constantly hear that 'we are a democracy'.  Such constantly repeated dis-information is a form of propaganda being deliberately spouted by all manner of politicians and government officials.  It is a form of brain-washing.  They can't all be that ignorant of our history and Constitution, can they?  If not, why are they constantly re-iterating the 'democracy' propaganda?  For what purpose?

The Founders of our country were extremely knowledgeable about the issue of democracy and feared a democracy as much as a monarchy.  They understood that the only entity that can take away the people's freedom is their own government, either by being too weak to protect them from external threats or by becoming too powerful and taking over every aspect of life.  BOTH of which we now face.

Our forefathers knew very well the meaning of the word "democracy", and the history of democracies; and they were deliberately doing everything in their power to prevent having a democracy.

In a Republic, the sovereignty resides with the people themselves.  In a Republic, one may act on his own or through his representatives when he chooses to solve a problem.  The people have no obligation to the government; instead, the government is a servant of the people, and obliged to its owner, We the People.  Many politicians have lost sight of that fact.  We need to take back our sovereign rights to control those 'servants'.

A Constitutional Republic has some similarities to democracy in that it uses democratic processes to elect representatives and pass new laws, etc.  The critical difference lies in the fact that a Constitutional Republic has a Constitution that limits the powers of the government.  It also spells out how the government is structured, creating checks on its power and balancing power between the different branches.

What we have now is a far cry from the Constitutional Republic created by our founding fathers, which was based upon checks and balances.  Our Congress has COMPLETELY capitulated its Constitutional duties to the executive branch by rubber stamping the two bills titled the Military Commissions Act (MCA) of 2006 and the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2007.  Those two 'Acts' have granted the president 'despotic powers' and placed 'We the People' in dire peril far exceeding anything that has come before.  It is a far cry from the goal of a Constitutional Republic which was created to avoid the dangerous extreme of either tyranny or mobocracy, BOTH of which now exist in America.

Today . . . Tyranny Already Reigns!

The traitors of our country are working to render us hopeless and helpless, and under the dominion of foreign entities who will control our freedom of movement, power grids and resources.  Does that frighten you to think that we will be subjected to the dominion of foreign countries and their control right here in our own country?  It should!

The One World Monopolists are removing our sovereignty, little by little . . . one bridge, one road, one port, one water facility, one power grid . . . incrementally over time.  That has been their plan ever since, and actually long before, CFR member Richard N. Gardner, wrote in a 1974 Foreign Affairs article titled:  The Hard Road to World Order wrote:  In short, the 'house of world order' will have to be built from the bottom up rather than the top down. ...but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.(79)

Since Waco and the SPP signing, the president has instructed ALL the departments of the Executive Branch to form 'work groups' and 'task forces', headed by 'MINISTERS', to work in SECRET to 'harmonize' ALL of our regulatory laws.  They are being led by the Commerce Department in collusion with the Dept. of State and the Department of Homeland Security who tell us that all they are doing is having a 'dialog', which of course is a blatant LIE!  They are illegally working with foreign countries to create memorandums of understanding and agreements, signed declarations of intent, written arrangement on the use of [fill in the blank], creating liberalization of rules of [fill in the blank] and re-wrote frameworks of common principles, 'totalization' agreements on Social Security, etc. . . all without the consent of Congress, which is required by our Constitution.  All along, their complicit corporate media has deliberately kept 'We the People' in the dark, treating us just like mushrooms and being fed you know what!

The Constitution of the United States . . . Article I: Section 10., Clause 3:
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
Do You Know That America Has 'MINISTERS'?

Condoleezza Rice According to our State Department:  The following is a "joint statement issued by Ministers from Canada, Mexico and the United States responsible for the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America:  The Leaders [not our Congress nor We the People] of Canada, Mexico and the United States launched the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) to increase security, prosperity, and improve the quality of life for the citizens of each sovereign nation.  Last March in Cancun, Leaders reaffirmed their commitment to the SPP and identified five priorities:

1)  Strengthening Competitiveness through creation of a private sector-led [that's blatant FASCISM] North American Competitiveness Council (NACC), and enhancing regulatory cooperation [busy 'harmonizing' our regulatory laws according to corporate dictates];

2)  Emergency Management [does our emergency (think 9/11 or Katrina here) have anything to do with Canada and Mexico?];

3)  Avian and Pandemic Influenza [based on this author's research, is what will most likely usher in martial law];

Avian Flu

4)  Energy Security [what does that have to do with the NAFTA trade agreement?]; and

5)  Smart, Secure Borders [If our borders were 'smart' and 'secure' we wouldn't have 30 million illegal aliens invading our country, would we?]."

"We, the Canadian and United States Ministers responsible for Foreign Affairs, Security and Prosperity, are pleased to welcome our counterparts from the new Government of Mexico.  We met today to review progress since the Leaders' meeting in Cancun and are pleased to report that progress has been achieved in a number of areas."(80)

You did notice, not one single word about the fact that their 'progress' is accomplished behind closed doors, in secrecy, and based upon the dictatorial collaboration of three 'leaders' . . . all in violation of our Constitution.  Doesn't that bother you?

Those co-operative meetings are being held in secret in places like Banff, Canada.  Members throughout every department of our Executive Branch, are working stealthily and frantically to re-write ALL of the bureaucratic regulatory laws between the three countries.  They call this 'harmonization' which is a word you should fear.  The are now on a downhill race to the finish line.  They want to end our sovereignty and our Constitutional Republic before We the People awaken.  They have no shame and intend to do whatever it takes, no matter who stands in their way, which is EXACTLY how they operated in creating the European Union.(81)

Ask Yourself This Question . . .

Didn't you ever wonder why most Americans don't know that is going on in their own country?

The answer is that the media is completely controlled by a very few who work in concert with the money mafia of bankers, corporate heads, and non-profit foundations.  A plutocracy that consists of a group of very wealthy people who control our government and has done so for more than a century.  They deliberately set out to propagandize their goals and ambitions long enough, loud enough and often enough to overcome your objections.  Their most consistent and liberally applied propaganda weapon has been that of omission.

How Do We Know What They Have Done?  Here Are Some Historical Clues . . .

"One night, in roughly 1880, John Swinton (1829-1901), a preeminent New York journalist and prior editor of the New York Times from 1860-1870, was the guest of honour at a banquet given him by the leaders of his craft.  Someone who knew neither the press nor Swinton offered a toast to the independent press.  Swinton's response enraged his colleagues when he said:

There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history, in America, as an independent press.  You know it and I know it.

There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print.  I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with.  Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job.  If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone.

The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread.  You know it and I know it, and what folly is this toasting an independent press?

We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes.  We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance.  Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men.  We are intellectual prostitutes
.(82)

Control of the American Media by the Wealthy Elite is Nothing New . . .

In February 1917, Congressman Callaway inserted the following statement in the Congressional Record in an effort to expose the control of our newspapers by J.P. Morgan and his associates.  Their intent was to use the print media to disseminate propaganda aimed at forcing the United States into the First World War.

J.P. Morgan
J.P. Morgan, Sr.
"In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests ... got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to CONTROL generally the policy of the daily press of the United States.  These 12 men worked the problem out by selecting 179 newspapers, and then began, by an elimination process, to retain only those necessary for the purpose of controlling the general policy of the daily press throughout the country.  They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers.  The 25 papers were agreed upon; emissaries were sent to purchase the policy ... of these papers; ... an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information....  This contract is in existence at the present time, and it accounts for the news columns of the daily press of the country being filled with all sorts of preparedness arguments and misrepresentations...."(83)
By the end of World War II, the Rockefellers, and their front organization the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), rivaled the power of J.P. Morgan interests in controlling the major media and publishing outlets in the United States.  Charles Austin Beard was America's leading historian during the first half of the twentieth century.  Writing in the Saturday Evening Post on October 4, 1947, he warned:
"The Rockefeller Foundation and the Council on Foreign Relations ... intend to prevent ... a repetition of what they call ... "the debunking journalistic campaign following World War I."  Translated into precise English, this means that the Foundation and the Council do not want journalists or any other persons to examine too closely and criticize too freely the official propaganda and official statements relative to our basic aims and activities during World War II."
Even in 1947 it was apparent that the Rockefellers and the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) had the power to censor the news.  It is not simply by chance that since 1953 all but one American Secretary of State, all but one Deputy Secretary of State, all but one Director of the CIA, and every Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board have come from the Rockefeller-controlled Council on Foreign Relations.  [In FACT] . . . 6 of our last 9 Presidents have been CFR members.(84)

Then There Was Those Russian Observations . . .

John Pilger, an investigative journalist, cites the following story:  "During the Cold War, a group of Russian journalists toured the United States.  On the final day of their visit, they were asked by their hosts for their impressions.  'I have to tell you,' said their spokesman, “that we were astonished to find, after reading all the newspapers and watching TV, that all the opinions on all the vital issues were, by and large, the same.  To get that result in our country, we imprison people, we tear out their fingernails.  Here, you don't have that.  What's the secret?  How do you do it?”(85)

Pilger then rhetorically asks:  "What is the secret?  It's a question now urgently asked of those whose job is to keep the record straight:  who in this country have extraordinary constitutional freedom.  I refer to journalists, of course, a small group who hold privileged sway over the way we think, even the way we use language."(85)

John Pilger
John Pilger

Pilger goes on to say:  "I have been a journalist for more than 40 years.  Although I am based in London, I have worked all over the world, including the United States, and I have reported America's wars.  My experience is that what the Russian journalists were referring to is censorship by omission, the product of a parallel world of unspoken truth and public myths and lies:  in other words, censorship by journalism . . ."(85)

Here's Today's Version Of Media Control . . .

Critics charge that the Macquarie [an Australian Bank] purchase of American Consolidated Media is designed to silence critics of a Texas toll road project [Trans-Texas Corridor (TTC-35)].(86)

Trans-Texas Corridor Logo Australian toll road giant Macquarie agreed Wednesday [1/24/07] to purchase forty local independent newspapers, primarily in Texas and Oklahoma, for $80 million.  Macquarie Bank is Australia's largest capital raising firm and has invested billions in purchasing roads in the US, Canada and UK.(86)

Each of the newspapers had a readership of about 5,000 homes.  They will each receive TWO MILLION DOLLARS for their miniscule readership circulation.  This fact tells you how important the One World Monopolists believe the control of the media is, and it is their answer to keeping the sheeple in the dark!

Media Manipulation In Britain . . .

"A multi-million pound propaganda war to force the British people to love the European Union and Brussels bureaucrats is to be launched by Tony Blair as part of his legacy as Prime Minister, it has been revealed."(87)

"The operation to overcome strong opposition to the EU in Britain and soften them up in the event of fresh moves to forge closer links with Brussels was secretly agreed [to] by Mr Blair and his Ministers at last week's Cabinet meeting.  Details of the plan, obtained by The Mail on Sunday, show how the Prime Minister is so frustrated at his failure to persuade voters that the EU is a good thing, he is to spend a fortune from public funds in a final attempt to brainwash them before he resigns next year."(87)

"They include banning Ministers and officials from referring to unpopular EU institutions like the European Commission, places such as Brussels and Strasbourg, the euro currency, terms like 'Eurocrat' and 'EU directive' and controversial policies such as the Common Agricultural Policy and the EU constitution."(87)

"A new network of Whitehall spin doctors with orders to promote the EU has been created, with one senior "Press co-ordinator' in all 23 Government departments.  They will help No 10 draw up a 'rolling grid of upcoming EU issues' to ensure British voters are fed with a constant diet of pro-EU news."(87)

Fortunately the British press isn't as 'controlled' as ours is here in the USA.  You don't think for one minute that kind of information would EVER get in our media, do you?

How The One World Monopolists Operate . . .

In a report titled The First Global Revolution, published in 1991 by the Club of Rome, a globalist think tank, you will find the following statement:  "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill...  All these dangers are caused by human intervention...  The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."(88)

Take note that as far back as 1991, the One World Monopolists were already plotting ways to wage war against We the People.  That's how long they have been working on creating 'the threat of global warming'!

This is but ONE example of how sick and evil these people are!  They are willing to take their ideas and twist them to promote their global agenda.  They have many willing 'helpers,' especially the media, to propagandize their manufactured causes by distorting and blowing them all out of proportion in order to push and promote their planned One World Monopoly.

Are you outraged yet?

The current global warming hysteria serves as an excuse to create a totalitarian world government sherparded along by the United Nations.  The first meeting of the UN was presided over by Alger Hiss, who was later proven to be a communist.  The ground under the UN was donated by the anti-American global monopolist John D. Rockefeller and perpetuated by his sons.  David Rockefeller is the current leader of the CFR, and founder and head of the Trilateral Commission as well as the Council of the Americas.

If The Problem Doesn't Exist . . . We'll Whip One Up!

It seems that:  "Proponents of a system of world government and the tyrannical measures that accompany it have seized upon the popular issue of global warming to advance long existing plans for global governance.  World government has been the desire of power hungry organizations and the individuals running them for many years.  The Bilderberg Group, CFR, Trilateral Commission, and their think tanks like the Club of Rome are all such organizations.  Council on Foreign Relations member James Paul Warburg, who was the son of Paul Moritz Warburg, a prominent banker, stated before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1950 that, 'We shall have world government whether or not you like it -- by conquest or consent'."(89)

The One World Monopolists are currently making a three-pronged attack upon our sovereignty using these tools:  "Terrorism, economics, and global warming are all reasons given by proponents of world government as evidence of the necessity for a new world order.  If world government is to be achieved by consent, as Mr. Warburg put it, then the world must be sold on the idea of world government and its necessity."(89)

We Already Have An 'Economy In Crisis' Thanks To The Globalists . . .

From the website Economy in Crisis here is their list: (90) "If these trends continue unabated, what future could we possibly have?  This wealth of this country was created under far different conditions than those that now exist.  We are being misled into believing a false sense of perpetual invulnerable self-sufficiency.  We largely fail to acknowledge just how extremely vulnerable we are.  Given the scale of the problems outlined below, any single major disruption to our economy could have devastating consequences."(90)

"Decide for yourself."(90)

CFR Member Dr. Robert Pastor Says Terrorism Means Eliminate Your Borders . . .

"Robert Pastor, a leading intellectual force in the move to create a North American Union, told WND he believes a new 9/11 crisis could be the catalyst to merge the U.S., Mexico and Canada . . .  Mr. Pastor published an interview in Spanish in the Oct. 24 [2006] issue of Poder y Negocios [in an article titled:  El provacador].  He told the magazine crises can force decisions that otherwise would not be made."(91)

"The 9/11 crisis made Canada and the United States redefine the protection of their borders, Pastor explained.  The debt crisis in Mexico forced the government to adapt a new economic model.  Crises oblige governments to make difficult decisions."(91)

Tommy Franks Believes Terrorism Will Cause Us To 'Militarize Our Country'

According to Gen. Tommy Franks, martial law will replace the Constitution after the next terror attack.  In an interview with Cigar Aficionado he said:  “It means the potential of a weapon of mass destruction and a terrorist, massive, casualty-producing event somewhere in the Western world – it may be in the United States of America – that causes our population to question our own Constitution and to begin to militarize our country in order to avoid a repeat of another mass, casualty-producing event.  Which in fact, then begins to unravel the fabric of our Constitution.  Two steps, very, very important.”(92)

Tommy Franks Didn't you ever wonder why General Tommy Franks so abruptly left the military, when it seemed that the dust had not yet settled from his 'shock and awe' campaign in Iraq?

Perhaps he was in a hurry to receive his accolades as noted in the June 18 London Observer:  "The British government has been secretly awarding honors to senior U.S. military and foreign businessmen with lucrative public sector contracts."  General Tommy Franks, commander of the 'shock and awe' invasion of Iraq was among those quietly made Commanders of the British Empire (CBE).  "Other figures rewarded include: Vice Admiral Timothy Keating, who was in charge of all maritime forces involved in Operation Iraqi Freedom; Rear Admiral Barry Costello, Commander of the Third fleet and Task Force 55 during the Iraq invasion; Lieutenant Colonel Mark Childress; and General Tad Moseley, Chief of Staff to the US Air Force."(93)

For the Record:  Article I, section 9 of the U.S. Constitution specifies:  "No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States:  And no Person holding an Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State".


As For 'Global Warming' ~ Here's Britain's 'Solution' . . .

British Busing British Busing

"Tony Blair stands with Gordon Brown, Environment Secretary David Milliband and schoolchildren next to a passenger bus fueled by soya oil."(94)

"Britain will lead the world towards combating climate change, Prime Minister Tony Blair vowed today as he unveiled the Government's blueprint for reducing harmful emissions."(94)

Mr. Blair said the new draft legislation - which binds the UK to a 60 per cent cut by 2050 - was a "revolutionary step".(94)

ZERO 'Carbon Emissions' Which Will Require 'Home Inspections'

The draconian regulations will require:  "All new homes [to have] 'ZERO carbon' [emissions] -- with extra insulation, solar panels or wind turbines and energy efficient appliances - by 2016.  Existing homeowners to have 'home energy audits'.  Electricity to come 'largely or wholly' from low or zero carbon sources, including wind, wave, solar, tidal and nuclear power."(95)

How does the government intrusion into your home in order to do an 'energy audit' sit with you?

As For 'Windpower' . . .

To give you some idea of the size of a single wind turbine, take a look at the photos below.  And you thought that telephone poles were unsightly.  Wait till you experience living near them and having to close your blinds on a sunny day when the strobe flashing effects caused by the blades becomes intolerable inside your home; or put up with the grinding sounds from the mechanisms as the blades change their direction to face into the wind; or duck from the lethal ice chunks that fly off the blades in the winter; or sacrifice five acres of beautiful woods that must be removed to accommodate the footprint of ONE turbine; or live along the roads that carry high-tension power lines, a known and proven health hazard, that runs from the turbines to the ground power stations along miles and miles of roads to close homes; and perhaps even occasionally wonder how the ground vibrations effect the wildlife.(96)

Windmill Windmill Vane This is ONE blade.

Mr. Brown, most likely the next Prime Minister, and the current Prime Minister, Mr. Blair, are warning homeowners as they unveil their 'green vision'.  "Homeowners who refuse to make their properties energy efficient will face financial penalties under drastic government plans to transform Britain into the world's first 'green' economy."(95)

"Ministers yesterday promised deep cuts to greenhouse gas emissions that they warned would mean everyone in the country having to 'live, work and travel differently' [read less comfortably or more shabbily, the operative word being . . . LESS]."(95)

Ironically . . . "Mr Blair compared the fight against climate change to the battle against fascism.  Labour's legislation sets an interim target of a 26 per cent to 32 per cent reduction in carbon dioxide emissions by 2020, and 60 per cent by 2050.  It will make Britain the first country in the world with legally binding targets."(95)

"A panel will advise ministers on carbon targets every five years.  If they miss the figure, future governments will face court action.  The draft Bill will now be subject to consultation, but the Government hopes it will be law by Easter 2008.  Mr Brown, who doubled air passenger duty [taxes] last year, said he would not impose further 'green taxes' on aviation in next week's Budget."(95)

There are some 'red flags' there, pun intended.  Wasn't it the Communists of Russia whose 'ministers' set goals for 'five years' at a time?  Targets that were almost never achieved because of their collectivist system, all the while the people went without, never knowing what it was to have what they needed, including bread.  Also, did you happen to notice that there was to be a 'panel' that will advise the ministers?  Will that 'panel' come from the corpratocracy?  Probably so.  Wouldn't that mean FASCISM, the combining of government and private corporations?  Do you understand all the substantive ironies here?  Most of all, don't you love the euphemistic language they use to fool you and keep you silent because you do NOT know who will sit on those panels, you just ASSUME that they will be people working in your best interest.  Think again!  Isn't it clever how they can propagandize us with a single word . . . 'panel'?

Here Comes The 'New World Order' . . .

Power Lines Windmill Vane (97) London AFP

Gordon Brown and the 'New World Order' . . .

Sharing the bus ride with Tony Blair is Gordon Brown, who will most likely to be the next prime minister.  He delivered a speech before the Green Alliance in London, calling for a "New World Order" to combat global warming on Tuesday, March 13, 2007.(97)

Do the Brits really want to elect another One World Monopolist to run their country?  Didn't they have enough with Blair and the others before him?  Haven't they 'wised up' yet to the totalitarian goals of these people?  We shall see.

"According to excerpts released by the finance ministry, Chancellor of the Exchequer Brown will also say the United Nations should make the fight against global warming a core "pillar" of its international mission."(98)

"Brown will praise the European Union's progress in combating climate change after EU leaders on Friday agreed to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide by 20 percent by 2020, compared to 1990 levels."(98)

"He is set to announce domestic policy proposals that are targeted at HELPING Britons save energy, thereby cutting their individual carbon emissions, ahead of the government's publication of its Climate Change Bill on Tuesday."(98)


British Busing (95)

The Green line-up:  Mr Millband (left), Mr Brown and Mr Blair join pupils on the bus yesterday.  It's probably the last time the three of them will be seen riding a bus.

How does it 'help' Britons to have people invade their private homes to inspect for carbon emissions?  How does it 'help' the Brits to lower their temperature comfort levels to address the globalist lie of 'climate change?'  Considering that climate change, has ALWAYS existed since the beginning of time.  And, how does it 'help' the Britons if they don't 'measure up' or rather 'down' to the required level of carbon emission, for which they will get FINED!  How do all those negatives 'HELP' the Brits?  What Brown has expressed is . . . CLASSIC euphemistic doublespeak!

PPPSSSssssttttt! Mr. Blair, Did You Know . . .

That SUN FLARES cause global warming.  It is suggested that his advisors need to help him get 'up to speed' by having him watch this Martin Durkin, British Documentary titled The Great Global Warming Swindle, which runs for one hour and fifteen minutes.  As a Ph.D. researcher and statistician, this author can vouch for the quality of the graphics and clear and concise research that destroys the manufactured lie of 'global warming!'

Anyone who views this entire video, who still believes in 'global warming', this author would like to hear from you.

As for Blair, perhaps his aides could 'advise' him to read the article titled:  Scores of Top Scientists Expose the Global Warming Myth, found here:  (99)

Lastly, his advisors might also encourage him to learn about the coercion that many legitimate scientists are facing who dare to speak out against the global warming hoax as described in this article titled:  Scientists threatened for 'climate denial', by Tom Harper archived here:  (100)

If it is a valid claim that 'global warming' or 'climate change' is caused by we humans, then why is it necessary for the global warming alarmists to so viciously attack those who disagree?  The evidence for global warming should be powerful enough to refute those who disagree.  Instead we find an almost religious fervor about global warming and man's shameful contribution to it, rather than facts.  That should be a 'red flag' for anyone who is paying attention.

In FACT the preponderance of evidence shows that we humans contribute such an infinitesimal amount of CO2 that we couldn't possibly be responsible for global warming.  Further, there is that stubborn FACT that, according to ice core samples from BEFORE the industrial age, CO2 emissions were significantly higher than today -- which says volumes about their absurd claims!

Lastly, the global warming alarmists have ignored the MASSIVE amount of scientific data that CLEARLY shows that warming and cooling of the climate is DIRECTLY related to sun flares and accompanying solar winds.

If you will recall, the globalist Club of Rome 'think tank' stated:  "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill....  All these dangers are caused by human intervention...  The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."(88)

Richard Haass Richard N. Haass (101)

The One World Monopolists have PLANNED to hype the 'global warming' scare so they could tax us for 'carbon emissions.'  The proposed 'carbon tax' is the REAL reason behind the trumped up claims of 'global warming'.  The members of the Shadow Government are already pushing hard for a carbon emission's tax.  Go and review the testimony provided by Rhodes Scholar and CFR President, Richard N. Haass, who testified in behalf of such a tax before the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming in the U.S. House of Representatives, on April 18, 2007.(101)

Mr. Haass is typical of the One World Monopolists who subscribes to the classic propaganda doublespeak as follows:  "Some governments are prepared to give up elements of sovereignty to address the threat of global climate change.  Under one such arrangement, the Kyoto Protocol, which runs through 2012, signatories agree to cap specific emissions.  What is needed now is a successor arrangement in which a larger number of governments, including the US, China, and India, accept emissions limits or adopt common standards because they recognize that they would be worse off if no country did."(102)

"All of this suggests that sovereignty must be redefined if states are to cope with globalization.  At its core, globalization entails the increasing volume, velocity, and importance of flows -- within and across borders -- of people, ideas, greenhouse gases, goods, dollars, drugs, viruses, e-mails, weapons and a good deal else, challenging one of sovereignty's fundamental principles:  the ability to control what crosses borders in either direction.  Sovereign states increasingly measure their vulnerability not to one another, but to forces beyond their control."(102)

"Globalization thus implies that sovereignty is not only becoming weaker in reality, but that it needs to become weaker.  States would be wise to weaken sovereignty in order to protect themselves, because they cannot insulate themselves from what goes on elsewhere.  Sovereignty is no longer a sanctuary."(102)

The response to those three paragraphs should be:  Huh, what did he just say?  And, why should we give up our sovereignty?  Logic does NOT prevail.  How does a nation, or as they brain-wash you by calling them 'states,' give up ELEMENTS of sovereignty?  You are either sovereign or you are NOT!  First they want a you to give up a little, then more, and more . . . until there is nothing left, as demonstrated by the death of their national sovereignty by ALL of the once sovereign nations of the EU who are now not even 'states', just an amorphous blob called the European Union.

Here's a reality check:  Those flimsy, deceptive arguments that "globalization entails the increasing volume, velocity, and importance of 'flows' . . . of people, ideas, greenhouse gases, goods, dollars, drugs, viruses, e-mail, weapons and a good deal else" somehow 'challenges' sovereignty, requiring it to be weakened, is UTTERLY RIDICULOUS!  Think about it, those things already can and do happen DAILY. . . all without ONE WHIT of need to weaken or reduce our sovereignty.  See how they manipulate us with their brain-washing propaganda?  Do you suppose that argument, which was made before our Congress, will be used by its members to ramp up the assault on creating justification for the NAU?  Count on it!

Of Course It's Really All About the MONEY!

Why is there all this false propaganda, vicious censorship and intimidation?  The fact is that the driving force behind 'climate change' is the same as it always is . . . MONEY!

Money that will come from global fines and taxes on carbon emissions.  Money from non-profits and governments that flows to those who labor in the global warming research field.  Money from tax dollars that will be used to fund the 'global warming' industry and its associated minions who promulgate the rules and regulations.  Massive amounts of money that will be spent to provide informational education, media exposure and those costly propaganda materials.  Money to pay for meeting venues.  And, don't forget about those who will be paid money to police those 'carbon emission' law breakers.

Then there is the money to be made by corporations who will make all of those carbon free technologies and products.  Products that are already being foisted upon us such as the highly touted mercury filled light bulbs which are poisonous to humans and very costly for consumers.

Global warming also provides 'talking points' and 'planks' for hyping political positions.  The hoax also gives unwarranted prominence on the world stage for 'propagandists' like Al Gore and Bill Clinton who receive massive speaking fees for their appearances not to mention all that ego stroking notoriety, and 'networking' that accompanies their 'command performances'.

The latest Clinton appearance was as the host for the 'climate summit' of 'world's mayors' held by NY City's Mayor Michael Bloomberg (CFR Member) for the "leaders from around the globe . . . with a message that the campaign to reverse global warming begins with the world's mayors."(103)

The 'climate summit' produced an agreement by sixteen cities around the world who will begin cutting carbon emissions by renovating city-owned building with green technology including New York, Chicago, Houston, Toronto, Mexico City, London, Berlin and Tokyo.

New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg said in a statement:  "By bringing together cities and partnering with the private sector, President Clinton [CFR member] and the Clinton [Global Initiative] foundation are providing the tools to help cities achieve our goals . . . "(104)

"The makeovers will include replacing heating, cooling and lighting systems with energy-efficient networks; making roofs white or reflective to deflect more of the sun's heat; sealing windows and installing new models that let more light in; and setting up sensors to control more efficient use of lights and air conditioning."(104)

The public-private combination of business, banks and mayors will be a partnership of monumental fascist proportions.  The CLASSIC FASCIST combining of corporate desires and government power will connect the mayors with their willing partners of:  Citigroup Inc., Deutsche Bank AG, JPMorgan Chase & Co., UBS AG, and ABN Amro who will make those projects possible.  Clinton said:  "They're going to save money, make money, create jobs and have a tremendous collective impact on climate change all at once . . . "(104)

But . . . whose money will it be?  Why, taxpayers' money, of course . . .and with INTEREST to those banking 'partners' and corporations that provide the 'products.  All taken on by a single person for those large cities . . . the MAYOR!

Lastly, the 'global warming' hype will provide 'fodder' for the One World Monopolists and their totalitarian goals.  Climate change, aka 'global warming' will become one more of the mechanisms the plutocracy will use to control, dominate, and enslave us all.

More Proof About The 'Hoax Propandists' . . .

One reason for the push to promote the global warming hoax is evident when John Deutch, former head of the CIA, told those at a secret Trilateral Commission (TC) meeting in Brussels that:  "America should impose a $1-per gallon increase in the gasoline tax as penance for causing pollution . . . "  The very next day, The Washington Post, "which is always present at TC and Bilderberg meetings," obediently called for just such an increase on its editorial page.(105)

Another One World Monopolist . . .  "General Lord Guthrie, director of N.M. Rothschild & Sons, member of the House of Lords and former chief of the Defense Staff in London said:  'We must address the global climate crisis with a single voice, and impose rules that apply worldwide,' he said.  'Otherwise, our children and children’s children will endure starvation and unimaginable hardship.  We cannot address this crisis as 180 separate nation-states.  We must act as a single world state.'(105)

Why it that?  Because the One World Monopolists see themselves in complete control of that 'single world state' so that they can run the world however they want and We the People be damned.  That 'single world state' will be ruled by . . . guess who?  Not 'We the People', that's for sure.  We can see right through their ridiculous hoax.  We KNOW they are hyping 'the global crisis' to control us and scam us out of our tax dollars for a 'problem' that doesn't exist. For that matter, who's 'We' anyway?  We the People understand that they want to force us to reduce OUR quality of life, while they live 'high on the hog' in their gated communities, estates or compounds in places like Paraguay.  It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that out!

Global Warming Headlines Tell Us The TRUE Story Behind The Lie:
  1. 'Deep Pockets Needed for Climate Change Adaptation'(106)
  2. 'Globalists Love Global Warming:  Trilateral Commission, chairman of British Petroleum, CFR, Club of Rome fan hysteria to achieve world government'(107)
  3. 'Green Lies and Amazing Truths'(108)
  4. 'Global Warming Hysteria to Further North American Union?'(109)
Senate Bill Wants the Army Corps of Engineers to Consider Global Warming

"The vote was 51-42 in favor of the amendment to a water projects bill, falling nine short of the 60 votes needed to approve it under the rules set for the debate.  But sponsors of the proposal, led by [One World Monopolist] Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., said it was significant that the Senate was finally facing the issue head-on."(110)

"Opposition was led by Sen. James Inhofe, R-Oklahoma, the top Republican on the Environment and Public Works Committee and the Senate's leading skeptic of human-induced global warming."(110)

"Inhofe said that theory was being perpetrated by 'environmental alarmists who want to scare people.'  He said the Kerry amendment was 'clearly aimed' at moving the Senate toward a tax on carbon or other government efforts to limit carbon output."(110)

The New French President Wants America To Jump On The Global Warming Bandwagon

"Nicolas Sarkozy, a blunt and uncompromising pro-American conservative, was elected president of France Sunday [May 6, 2007] with a mandate to chart a new course for an economically sluggish nation struggling to incorporate immigrants and their children."(111)

"He urged the United States to take the lead on climate change and said the issue would be a priority for France.  'A great nation, like the United States, has a duty not to block the battle against global warming but - on the contrary - to take the lead in this battle, because the fate of the whole of humanity is at stake,' . . . "(111)

Those comments indicate that Sarkozy is either stupid, ignorant or part of the One World Monopolist cabal.

Here In The USA ~ Global Warming Is Being Sold As A National Security Issue . . .

Chuck Hagel CFR Member Chuck Hagel

"The CIA and Pentagon would for the first time be required to assess the national security implications of climate change under proposed legislation intended to elevate global warming to a national defense issue.  The bipartisan proposal, which its sponsors expect to pass the Congress with wide support, calls for the director of national intelligence to conduct the first-ever 'national intelligence estimate' [using still more of our tax dollars] on global warming."(112)

"The measure, sponsored by [CFR member] Senator Chuck Hagel, a Nebraska Republican, and Senator Richard J. Durbin , an Illinois Democrat, comes as other international bodies [read UN here] are taking steps to designate global warming as a high international priority."(112)

"The United Nations Security Council has put climate change on its agenda for the first time, warning that global warming could be a catalyst for new conflicts around the world.  The council said it would hold a high-level meeting on the issue later this month.  Sponsors of the Senate measure say it is likely to be approved, given the wide support for charting the impact of climate change and the traditional reluctance of lawmakers to stand in the way of research into national security."(112)

Edward Markey Edward J. Markey

"Representative Edward J. Markey, a Malden Democrat and chairman of the newly created House Select Committee on Energy Dependence and Global Warming, said he plans to offer a companion bill in the House.  [CFR member] John J. Hamre , who served as deputy secretary of defense in the Clinton administration, said global warming couched in security terms would make if far more difficult for politicians to ignore."(112)

The catastrophic scenarios being painted by the globalists and their coterie as they bludgeon us with their newest mantra of 'global warming' . . . stretches credulity.  One has only to consider that climate changes, aka 'global warming', takes decades and sometimes centuries to occur.  This insane hype, which includes talking of 'abrupt' or 'dramatic' change, is laughable.

Oddly enough, never once is the question asked about the legitimacy of 'global warming.'  Most importantly, why is there no questioning about the assumption that it is being caused by carbon dioxide from we humans.  All this hype is really nothing but propaganda in its boldest form.  It is simply globalist trickery to enfeeble the great strides of modernity and middle class prosperity.  It is just another way to enslave and control We the People.  It's an environmental 9/11 which brought forth the shredding of our Constitution and Bill of Rights via the USAPATRIOT Act.

The carbon dioxides emissions from human endeavors is so miniscule as to be laughable.  Besides . . . climate is ALWAYS changing.

If you do nothing more to educate yourself, at the very least you should watch this global warming video documentary mentioned above called:  The Great Global Warming Swindle.


In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.
~ Martin Luther King, Jr.


Stalwart Jesse Helms Spoke Out Against the Coming Totalitarianism for America . . .

In a speech made before the U.S. Senate on December 15, 1987 Senator Jesse Helms, spoke eloquently about the coming One World Monopoly when he said:
"This campaign against the American people - against traditional American culture and values - is systematic psychological warfare.  It is orchestrated by a vast array of interests comprising not only the Eastern establishment but also the radical left.  Among this group we find the Department of State, the Department of Commerce, the money center banks and multinational corporations, the media, the educational establishment, the entertainment industry, and the large tax-exempt foundations.

A careful examination of what is happening behind the scenes reveals that all of these interests are working in concert with the masters of the Kremlin in order to create what some refer to as a New World Order.  Private organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations, . . . the Trilateral Commission, .. . . Bilderberger Group serve to disseminate and to coordinate the plans for this so-called New World Order in powerful business, financial, academic, and official circles . . .

The influence of establishment insiders over our foreign policy has become a fact of life in our time.  This pervasive influence runs contrary to the real long-term national security of our Nation.  It is an influence which, if unchecked, could ultimately subvert our constitutional order . . .

In the globalist point of view, nation-states and national boundaries do not count for anything.  Political philosophies and political principles seem to become simply relative.  Indeed, even constitutions are irrelevant to the exercise of power.  Liberty and tyranny are viewed as neither necessarily good nor evil, and certainly not a component of policy.

In their point of view, the activities of international financial and industrial forces should be oriented to bringing this one-world design - with a convergence of the Soviet and American systems as its centerpiece - into being . . .  All that matters to this club is the maximization of profits resulting from the practice of what can be described as finance capitalism, a system which rests upon the twin pillars of debt and monopoly.  This isn't real capitalism.  It is the road to economic concentration and to political slavery.(113)
Just How Are They Erasing America? Let Us Count The Ways . . .

Public Roads Interstate

Arrogantly, the last three US presidents have been pushing for the massive forfeiture of our sovereign land to foreign countries.  They promote and condone the 'pillaging and sacking' of our taxpayer financed and taxpayer owned infrastructure consisting of roads, bridges, tunnels, ports, waterworks and much, much more.  It is an orgy of deals at firesale prices to create toll roads that will criss-cross America.  Roads which had been already paid for and owned by 'We the People'.

As for WHY our infrastructure is being auctioned off to the highest bidder, mostly foreign investors, the answer is that George H. W. Bush, a traitor and One World Monopolist, wrote and signed an ILLEGAL Executive Order (EO) 12803 on April 30, 1992 commanding that it be done.  That EO was published in only two places, Cornell University and on waterindustry.org, which has been removed.  The following was taken from EO 12803 and can be found in Section 1 on 'Definitions':
"For the purpose of this order:  (a) ‘Privatization’ means the disposition of or transfer of an infrastructure asset, such as by sale or by long-term lease, from State or local government to a private party."

"(b) 'Infrastructure asset' means any asset financed in whole or in part by the Federal Government and needed for the functioning of the economy.  Examples of such assets include, but are not limited to: roads, tunnels, bridges, electricity supply facilities, mass transit, rail transportation, airports, ports, waterways, water supply facilities, recycling and wastewater treatment facilities, solid waste disposal facilities, housing, schools, prisons and hospitals."(82)
The above Executive Order is an illegal and DIRECT violation of our Constitution AND of our Exon-Florio laws which:  "prohibits foreign direct investment in such industries as maritime, aircraft, banking, resources, and power."

Following Bush's lead, Bill Clinton, issued another unlawful Executive Order, EO 12893, interestingly numbered, and off by only one digit, from the original illegal EO 12803.  A possible sign that the One World Monopolists were the master minds because they are known to obsess over the intricacies of numerology.

You can find a comprehensive list of America's taxpayer financed roads being sold to the highest bidder via Public Private Partnerships (PPP).  Take note that the word 'partnerships' is a euphemistic (doublespeak) term which really means the fascist blending of [private/corporate + public/government = 'partnerships'] to the everlasting detriment of America's security and sovereignty, not to mention the violation of our Constitution and laws.(114)

The profitable, fascist, corporate-government connections are being covered up by secrecy, lies and deceptions, all of which are a trademark of those who have literally sold America's infrastructure out from under us without our knowledge or consent.  Read all about it in this article titled The Highwaymen found here: (115)

Outrageously -- there are even seminars provided to teach state and local government officials how to go about selling our taxpayer financed infrastructures to foreign private investment groups.  There was a "North American Private Partnerships Intensive Seminar, . . . held at the Hyatt Regency in Miami, March 19 to 21 [2007].  The cost will be $3,500 [probably paid using taxpayer dollars] per attendee."(116)

Sickening isn't it?

More On Privatization . . .

It seems that "water is quickly becoming the market's new holy grail."(117)

"[P]rivatization [of water] means transforming citizens into customers . . .  It is also means taking our most important resource and putting it at the whims of the market."(117)

Alan Snitow and Deborah Kaufman, documentary film makers, teamed up with author Michael Fox to write a book about the privatization of water battles going on across America.  Battles that stretched "from California to Massachusetts and from Georgia to Wisconsin."  The authors documented the "rise of public opposition to corporate control of water resources".(117)

They said that:  "We came to see that the conflicts over water are really about fundamental questions of democracy itself:  Who will make the decisions that affect our future, and who will be excluded? . . .  And if citizens no longer control their most basic resource, their water, do they really control anything at all?"(117)

Many 'heavy hitters' in the stock market are currently buying up springs, ponds, lakes, streams, aquifers and water 'rights' to position themselves in the market should water becomes scarce for whatever reason.

Sheep's Clothing

The SPP ~ A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing . . .

The Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) was announced in the media in March of 2004 without the explanation that the 'Security' was to be a perimeter enclosing Canada, America and Mexico into a so-called defensible area that begins at Canada's northern border and Mexico's southern border.  Our country will no longer have any borders which means the END to our sovereignty!

The SPP was announced in the media without the explanation that 'Prosperity' was meant to raise up Mexico's poverty at the expense of the United States and Canadian taxpayers.  And that the 'Partnership' was to be one of Corporate America in bed with our government driving and endorsing ALL aspects of the agenda of regulatory changes between our country and our neighbors, which is, as Mussolini defined it -- blatant TREASONOUS FASCISM.

What one must understand is that ALL of the above plans are straight out of the European Union blueprint.  Beware that those plans include massive, extremely negative, sovereignty eliminating consequences for ALL Americans.

Such machinations are well beyond comprehension of the average person who has been duped into apathy by the complicit silence of the corporate conglomerates who control ALL the media, with the rare exception of some independent newspapers, talk radio and the internet.

Conferences Are Used to Subvert America By Promoting The CFR/SPP Agenda

In February 16, 2007, at a conference covering the development of a North American legal system, Robert Pastor, 'Pied Piper' of the NAU and member of the CFR, denied that he is at the center of a 'vast conspiracy' to subvert American sovereignty, when "holding of the conference was itself evidence that a comprehensive process underway to merge the economies . . . [which was] conducted in cooperation with the American Society of International Law, an organization affiliated with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations, was held at the American University Washington College of Law."(118)

"Academic literature distributed in advance to conference participants about a common legal framework for the U.S., Canada and Mexico included proposals for a North American Court of Justice (with the authority to overrule a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court), a North American Trade Tribunal, a North American Court of Justice, and a Charter of Fundamental Human Rights for North America, also dubbed the North American Social Charter."(118)

"Pastor's luncheon speaker, Eric Farnsworth, the Vice-President of the Council of the Americas, provided some valuable insight into this process.  Saying NAFTA is 'no longer enough', he described the SPP as designed to help North America meet the economic challenges posed by such countries as China and India."(118)

"Farnsworth said that the Council of the Americas, which advises the SPP, would shortly issue 300 recommendations designed to improve business conditions in the U.S., Mexico and Canada.  He was unclear as to whether the U.S. Government would try to implement these initiatives on its own, through the administrative or regulatory process, or whether they would be submitted to Congress for approval."(118)

The fact that the question was not 'clear' is prima facie evidence that they are operating illegally and with stealth to end our Constitutional Republic by any means necessary.  The cabal has help from many who are working in concert to destroy our country.  As was stated above:

The Constitution of the United States . . . Article I: Section 10., Clause 3:
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
Is NAFTA Legal? . . . You Decide:

At that same conference there was a significant uproar when "Alan Tarr, director of the Center for State Constitutional Studies at Rutgers University, was challenged about glossing over President Clinton's submission of NAFTA as an agreement, requiring only a majority of votes in both Houses of Congress for passage, and not a treaty, requiring a two-thirds vote in favor in the Senate.  NAFTA passed by votes of 234-200 in the House and 61-38 in the Senate.  Tarr said he had not intended to be uncritical of what Clinton did.  Pastor quickly interjected that there was nothing improper in submitting NAFTA as an agreement rather than a treaty."(118)

But of course it was TOTALLY ILLEGAL, it was a defiant violation of our Constitution, and was allowed to move forward without the two-thirds requirement and rubber stamped by BOTH houses of Congress.  Then our corrupt courts concluded as follows:

". . .Clinton's move was seen at the time as an effort to bypass constitutional processes and the United Steelworkers challenged NAFTA's constitutionality in court.  The case reached the U.S. Supreme Court in 2001, after lower courts had thrown the case out, saying it was a political matter between the president and Congress.  The Bush Administration sided with Clinton and the Supreme Court declined to get involved."(118)

Why do we even have a 'Supreme Court' if they won't deal with the most fundamental legal questions involving Constitutionality?  It reveals, once more, just how corrupt the courts have become.

If The American People Try To Fight Back How Will They Stop Us? . . .  By force if necessary!

We now have in residence in the White House . . . a despot.  He can and will call forth martial law as soon as the latest 'trigger' appears, whether it arrives naturally or not.  Please read this author's Two Acts of Tyranny on the Same Day! found here or listen to this MP3 audio in order to understand the full breadth and depth of those two acts of tyranny, passed by large majorities in the House and Senate.  The MCA was shamefully signed into law in public ceremony, and the NDAA in a private Oval Office ceremony.  Those two 'Acts' have demolished the last shred of our Constitutional Republic and will ultimately bring down our country, legally, unless overturned on Constitutional grounds.

The American people need to heed the warning of Winston Churchill who said:
"If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed, if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not so costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival.  There may be a worse case.  You may have to fight when there is no chance of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves."
As for the 'bureaucratic elite' of wealthy globalists who function as the 'Shadow Government' . . . their ultimate goal is a so called NEW World Order, which is course is NOT NEW but is, in reality, a ONE World Order completely controlled by the One World Monopolists, those 'robber barons' of yore.  To that end, Franklin Delano Roosevelt managed to condemn their monopolist lust from the grave, in a message found enshrined on this FDR memorial:

THEY (WHO) SEEK TO ESTABLISH
SYSTEMS OF GOVERNMENT BASED ON
THE REGIMENTATION OF ALL HUMAN
BEINGS BY A HANDFUL OF INDIVIDUAL
RULERS CALL THIS A NEW [WORLD] ORDER
IT IS NOT NEW AND IT IS NOT ORDER


FDR Memorial

The illegal alien problem is simply the MECHANISM for leveraging what is yet to come.  Once the civil unrest and chaos caused by the overwhelming 'human tsunami' of illegal aliens reduces America to complete anarchy, a state of total lawlessness and riots or the bird flu pandemic arrives, or another 'Katrina' occurs, or a 'dirty bomb' is unleashed . . . the federal government will institute martial law.  One of those events or some other inventive pretext will then allow the 'Shadow Government' to step forward and VISIBLY take over our country.  They will use martial law to install a fascist One World Order dictatorial government in plain sight instead of clandestinely as they do now.(119)(120)

Are You Ready For The AU?

Our Shadow Government, financed and led by David Rockefeller, et al, is using their 'front man' of Dr. Robert Pastor along with their ideological cabal of other financial backers, in concert with those who populate our Congress, military and Executive Branch, to move far beyond the yet to be completed North American Union.  They are already working to combine North and South America into ONE.  It will be called the Americas (plural) Union, or the AU.

They will take the NAU and morph it into the AU by taking the formerly sovereign countries of Canada, the United States of America, Mexico, Brazil, Honduras, Argentina, Chili, Paraguay, etc. and combine them together.  They will not only obliterate our sovereign country, they will usurp even our name as we too will become an amorphous blob, or region as they call them, and we will become EXACTLY like the EU.  Are you ready for THAT -- Mr. and Mrs. America?
Are You Willing to be Combined With a Corrupt Mexico?

Robert Pastor
Dr. Robert A. Pastor

According to an insider, at a Robert Pastor conference on the NAU in March, 2007 . . .  "Alberto Szekely, a career ambassador and adviser to the Mexican Minister of Foreign Affairs, who said that the rule of law simply does not exist in Mexico and that corruption permeates governmental institutions.  He said reforms under the presidency of Vicente Fox went nowhere and that Mexico is one of the of the most corrupt countries in the world today."(118)  To anyone who is paying attention that is no surprise.

In fact "despite Fox's best intentions and concrete efforts to clean up and improve Mexico's law enforcement, it is still riddled with corruption at all levels (like the rest of the country).  If we compare Mexico to the European Union, the country doesn't fare too well.  According to one survey, the 2001 Corruption Perception Index from Transparency International, Mexico ranks behind Greece, which had the worst record of any EU member. Greece ranked 42 and Mexico 51 on the list of 91 countries worldwide (Canada ranked 7th and the United States 16th)."(121)

The question that needs to be asked is . . .

'Security' for whom?  Our borders are STILL not 'secure'!  And, our immigration laws remain unenforced.  Sanctuary cities abound. MS-13 gangs are everywhere.

'Prosperity' for whom?  Certainly not middle-class Americans!  We are already importing food.  Never before in our history has that happened.  Our manufacturing base has evaporated.  Those high-tech jobs are being handed over to those lower paid H1-B visa holders, while Americans end up 'flipping burgers' just to survive.  It is a well-documented fact.  Even though companies are required to pay H1-B visa holders 'prevailing' wages, they never do.  It's the same when employers violate our immigration laws by hiring illegal aliens, and our government simply looks the other way.

'Partnership' with whom . . . three heads of state?  A partnership with two countries that are incompatible socially, culturally (also think about French Quebec here), economically, and politically.  Most importantly is the difference of our constitutions and legal systems.  Why would America EVER want to merge with the corrupt oligarchy of Mexico, or the parliamentary style, socialist country of Canada?  Do you?

There is simply NO COMPARISON to the EU's minimal differences between first world countries compared to the huge differences in the economies between a third-world country like Mexico and the US or Canada.  There is a large glaring inequity in per capita GDP.  For example:  in 1999 the United States GDP was "$31,000; [for] Canada, $20,000, and Mexico, [it was] $4,900".  But that fact pales in comparison to the language, educational and cultural differences between Mexico and the United States, where political graft and corruption is endemic throughout Mexican society, where 'mordida' is an accepted and practiced way of life.(122)

Besides, the difference between 'rich and poor' countries Dr. Robert A. Pastor constantly refers mainly to the WEALTH, or business 'prosperity' of the country.  In the case of three disparate countries -- Mexico, Canada and the United States, Dr. Pastor appears to completely ignore the enormous cultural, social, educational, legal, political, linguistic, and societal issues as if they were of little or no consequence.  A glaring intellectual error.

European Flags Coin Logo Logo

Community vs. Union and the Globalists Propaganda Lies . . .

How cleverly the promoters of the North American Union have used the word 'community' when discussing the NAU.  Beware . . . because it is a very subtle form of PROPAGANDA.  To dissect the propaganda, let's compare Pastor's term of North American 'Community' with the TRUTH which is they are attempting to create a 'union.'

First let's examine the definition of community, as defined by Webster's:
  1. (a) all the people living in a particular district, etc., and (b) the district, city, etc., where they live.
  2. a group of people living together as a smaller social unit within a larger one, and having interests, work, etc., in common.
  3. a group of nations loosely or closely associated BECAUSE OF [or due to] common traditions or for political or economic advantage
  4. society in general; the public
  5. ownership or participation in common [community of goods]
  6. similarity, likeness [community of tastes]
  7. (a) the condition of living with others (b) friendly association; fellowship
Common Traditions?

Once the three countries have been combined into one, will we have 'common traditions' or will we each 'do' our own in isolation, all with no sense of commonality and unity?  Will all workers get off for the combined list of holidays?  Not likely, so that means some of each of our 'traditions' will be erased for the common good.  Which ones are you willing to forfeit?

Economic Advantages?

Will there be economic advantages for Americans, considering that we have lost MILLIONS of jobs under NAFTA?  Job losses that will continue to accelerate under CAFTA when the One World Monopolists find it is even cheaper to send their factories to South America.  This job loss is not like it was in prior economic downturns.  This time it is a PERMANENT loss of jobs, never to return.  Think about the horrendous economic reversal of our trade dollars with Canada and Mexico.  We have gone from a trade surplus nation to a trade deficit nation, which worsens every year.

What will it be like when we are combined?  The answer is really simple to deduce . . . Mexicans will gain a lot, Canadians will gain some and Americans will lose . . . BIG!

Political Advantages?

Do you see any political advantage to joining with Mexico whose political system is rife with corruption and graft?  What does America have in common with Canada's parliamentary government and socialism?  Didn't we choose a Constructional Republic?  Where will it go, how will it change in the 'Community'?  Pastor believes that there should be a "North American Parliamentary Group [which] would oversee the U.S. Congress".(1)

Will there be economic advantages?  Will our cultures blend into one?  Will our local communities become one?  Just think about the balkanizations that already exist throughout the southwest in many towns.  Will our political interests become one?  Think about the riots and protests in Mexico for months after the July presidential election.  In all probability the answer to all those questions is a loud and incontrovertible . . . NO!

Allegiance?

Where will one's allegiance lie?  Will it be to North America or . . . will it remain with Mexico, the USA or Canada?  Will our language become one?  If so which will it be, French, English or Spanish?  Will our traditions become one?  If so, which would they be, French, Spanish, Canadian/British or American?  We would no longer be the world renown 'melting pot' but simply a 'tossed salad' with no common cohesion and no common denominator to bind us together!

What has already happened to our communities across America is the disintegration of our social fabric, and degradation of our schools, jails, hospitals, and welfare system.  This has been the result of the overwhelming numbers of illegal aliens and legal immigrants whose culture, allegiance and language differences have ALREADY balkanized our communities, dumbed down our schools, wrecked our social services systems, closed hospitals, and filled our jails.  Do you think the future will get better when the doors are thrown wide open, with no restrictions, to all members of the North American continent?

Will the North American 'Community' desired by our fascist government become a 'friendly association' of 'fellowship'?  Will we all have the same 'community of tastes, similarity, likenesses'?  Look around you.  Is THAT what exists, even today?  Of course not!  Or will the contrived 'community,' that the One World Monopolists envision, simply be a marriage of convenience created SOLELY for the economic advantage of the monied elites?  Of course it will!

In fact, we will simply be a nation of 'people living in a particular district,' a 'smaller social unit' living within the larger area of North America having only a 'community of goods' and services in common.  Surely one can agree that such a combining will NOT include common 'interests' except for those 'interests' of the 'money mafia' (i.e., capitalists, corporatists and bankers) and their fascist cohorts in the government.

It Will Be a Union . . . NOT a Community As Per The Propagandists

Won't we simply be 'closely associated only for THEIR 'economic' advantage, not ours?  The planned North American Union will exist without any 'common traditions,' NOR 'political' or 'economic advantages'.  What we WILL be is a rudderless polyglot of disparate, balkanized peoples that just happen to populate the same piece of geography called North America?  Does THAT a 'community' make?  Of course not! Instead, we will simply and plainly become a 'union' as defined by Webster's thusly:
  1. a uniting or being united; combination; especially:  a)  combining, joining, or grouping together of nations, states, political groups, etc. for some specific purpose b)  a marrying or being married; marriage
  2. something united or unified, a whole made up of parts; esp., a)  an organization or confederation uniting various individuals, political units, etc.
So beware of the term 'community' used by the globalists to suck you in with their propaganda by using such benign, friendly, soft and agreeable terminology to cover up their plans for a North American Union.  We the People got it RIGHT!  The proof is that by DEFINITION we will NOT be a 'community.'

A Community is what you expect to happen AFTER the gradual progression of long periods of time, where people, events, politics, laws, jobs and geography bear upon those disparate peoples allowing them to coalesce and merge into a community.  It CAN NOT and does NOT happen instantly.  Whereas the creation of a union DOES.

Rip open the borders, as is planned by the 'comprehensive' amnesty the Congress is planning to foist upon us against our will which will send people flooding into our country.  People who are of disparate cultures, language, economic status, education levels and health.  You will have CHAOS which will tear apart the fabric of many 'communities' . . . but you WILL have a UNION!  That is their plan, which is also exactly what they did in Europe.

It will be a union WITHOUT the natural assimilation, acculturation and blending into the 'melting pot' the United States of America HAD famously achieved. It will NOT be a community. Instead it will be a mass of humanity forced to live side-by-side in balkanized disharmony until civil war breaks out. That 'war' will be inevitable because, as profoundly noted by Henry M. Morris in The Confusion of Tongues, "the real divisions among men are not racial or physical or geographic, but linguistic."

What is on the horizon?  Think about the ethnic riots in Paris and Australia, etc.  Think about what has already come and gone in South Africa and the degradation of Rhodesia into Zimbabwe.  Will you sit back and wait for a similar demise of America, or will you fight to keep what took 400 years to build and mature into what once was America the Beautiful?(123)

Speaking of Rhodesia . . .

A woman in South Africa by the name of Gemma Meyer (a pseudonym) warns those who remain cowed by the challenges ahead due to the overwhelming illegal alien invasion and the coming North American Union (NAU), both which will force the elimination of our borders and sovereignty in complete defiance of 'We the People' our Constitution, Bill of Rights, and laws.  Gemma warns we Americans . . .
"South Africa may be the grim model of the future Western world, for events in America reveal trends chillingly similar to those that destroyed our country [of Rhodesia].

America's structures are Western.  Your Congress, your lobbying groups, your free speech, and the way ordinary Americans either get involved or ignore politics are peculiarly Western, not the way most of the world operates.  But the fact that only about a third of Americans deem it important to vote is horrifying in light of how close you are to losing your western character.

Writing letters to the press, manning stands at country fairs, hosting fund-raising dinners, attending rallies, setting up conferences, writing to your Congressman - that is what you know, and that is what you are comfortable with.  Those are the political methods you've created for yourselves to keep your country on track and to ensure political accountability.

But woe to you if - or more likely, when - the rules change.  Americans may soon find themselves unable or unwilling to stand up to challenge the new political methods that will be the inevitable result of the ethnic metamorphosis now taking place in America.  Unable to cope with the new rules of the game - violence, mob riots, intimidation through accusation of racism, demands for proportionality based on racial number, and all the other social and political weapons used by the have-nots to bludgeon treasure and power form the haves - Americans, like others before them, will no doubt cave in.  They will compromise away their independence and ultimately their way of life.  (Note:  Be sure to read this paragraph 2 or 3 times!)

Once you lose social, cultural and political dominance, there is no getting it back again.

Unfortunately, your habits and values work against you.  You cannot fight terror and street mobs with letters to your Congressmen.  You cannot fight accusations of racism with prayer meets.  You cannot appeal to the goodness of your fellow man when the fellow man despises you for your weaknesses . . .  To survive, Americans must never lose the power they now enjoy to people from alien cultures.  Above all, don't put yourselves to the test of fighting only when your backs are against the wall.  You will probably fail.

Millions around the world want your good life.  But make no mistake:  They care not for the high-minded ideals of Jefferson, [Madison] and Washington and your Constitution.  What they want are your possessions, your power, your status.

And they already know that there are allies among you, the 'human rights activists' the skillful lawyers and the left wing politicians will fight for them and not for you.  They will exploit your Christian charity, and your good will.

They have studied you, Mr. and Mrs. America, and they know your weaknesses well.

They know what to do . . . Do you?"(124)
The GOOD News Is . . .

Watch as Lou Dobbs talks about the fact that the CFR controlled federal government is facing a rebellion from some 19 States who are resisting the push for the SPP-NAU.

Dobbs says that they are "lying" when they say that the harmonizations are for the purpose of 'safety' and "what they are doing is underhanded and not working in the interest of the United States"  Lou wants to know "what in the world does harmonize mean? . . .  It means nothing! . . .  It DOES mean that our sovereignty is under direct attack!"

You can find a map that graphically details the status of the now 18 states that are fighting against the NAU-SPP here:  (125)

If you want to be politically active and support your state's imitative to stop the NAU and the SPP you can get legislative information by the state and the phone numbers to call.  You can find out who is pushing the legislation and the identification of the bills, resolutions, or memorials that are being sponsored in your state.  Go here:  (126)

In this video . . . the Idaho's state congress voted against the NAU because they are "tired of the secrecy and want the US Congress to weigh in on this and get it out on the table and vote on it!"

Outrageously . . . in this same report is the revelation that in last year's comprehensive immigration bill titled the Immigration Reform Act of 2006 (i.e., S. 2611 aka the amnesty bill) includes A SMOKING GUN!  The One World Monopolist traitors inserted the following:  "(E) in developing and implementing an immigration security strategy for North America that works toward the development of a common security perimeter . . . "

There it is . . . their treasonous treachery exposed.  By those words 'a common security perimeter' they have adopted the CFR's plan to end America's sovereignty.  They are creating a law endorsing a perimeter which consists of the northern border of Canada and the southern border of Mexico.

Canadian House Of Commons Canadian Senate

Fortunately Canada's 'House of Commons' Has Some Backbone!

"An all-party House of Commons committee will give the secretive North American Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) its first public airing beginning today [April 26, 2007]."(127)

"Then-prime minister Paul Martin, U.S. President George W. Bush and former Mexican president Vicente Fox launched the SPP, known as the Three Amigos agreement, two years ago in Waco, Texas.  Since then, critics say the agreement has been hijacked by big corporations meeting in secret with government officials with the joint intent of fast-tracking the deeper integration of the Canadian, U.S. and Mexican economies."(127)

"NDP international trade critic Peter Julian, who has been pushing for the public hearings, wants them to lead to a debate in the House of Commons.  'We must have a full and accountable public debate and expose the entire agenda around the SPP . . .  What is being discussed is nothing less than the future of this country'."(127)

"The One World Monopolists term of 'deeper integration' is another example of a euphemism or 'double speak' for creating the North American Union by stealth!  Beware, be wary, and pay attention when they spew forth their propaganda, because they believe they have you buffaloed and under their control."(127)

BUT . . . the Meeting On the Canadian SPP Involvement -- Blows Up!

"Amid heated charges of a coverup, Tory MPs on Thursday abruptly shut down parliamentary hearings on a controversial plan to further integrate Canada and the U.S.  The firestorm erupted within minutes of testimony by University of Alberta professor Gordon Laxer that Canadians will be left "to freeze in the dark" if the government forges ahead with plans to integrate energy supplies across North America."(128)

"Tory MP Leon Benoit, chair of the Commons Standing Committee on International Trade which was holding the SPP hearings, ordered Laxer to halt his testimony, saying it was not relevant.  Opposition MPs called for, and won, a vote to overrule Benoit's ruling.  Benoit then threw down his pen, declaring, "This meeting is adjourned," and stormed out, followed by three of the panel's four Conservative members.  The remaining members voted to finish the meeting, with the Liberal vice-chair presiding."  Committee member, NDP MP Peter Julian said: "It's shocking the extent to which the Conservative party will go to cover up information about the SPP . . ."(128)

"Other MPs raised concerns about recently revealed plans under the SPP to raise Canadian limits on pesticide residues to match American rules.  Questions were also raised about whether the effort will open the door to bulk water exports."(128)

Connie Fogal

Meet Connie Fogal of the Canadian Action Party . . .

She provides a powerful in-depth Canadian perspective on the NAU.  She is "the redoubtable leader of the Canadian Action Party, delivers a hard hitting and passionate warning to all who refuse to believe that our democracy is being usurped by an elite few and is being sold off, brick by brick, to the highest bidder.  Our very own elected politicians are in collusion with powerful private corporate interests, working together behind closed doors to bring in the 'Security and Prosperity Partnership' by "stealth" -- as one proponent of the agreement put it -- without public knowledge or consultation."(129)

Watch Connie Fogal's revealing and damning video presentation, where she "argues that the Canadian sovereignty is very much at stake and she urges us [Canadians] to become informed and to take action before we ignorantly surrender all of our freedoms and public services to foreign corporate rule."(129)

Ms. Fogal appears again in a companion video titled North American Security and Prosperity Initiative where she warns of the "loss of democracy through the abdication of governance by politicians in favor of corporate appointees".

He Who Controls the Regulatory Process . . . Rules!

House of Representatives Which will it be? White House
The Legislature or The Executive


In January of 2007, the president released a new Executive Order that requires agencies to submit for review to the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) all 'significant guidance documents' that agencies produce.  It is the latest in "his stepped-up attack on the federal regulatory system - which establishes critical health, environmental, occupational, vehicle and other protections for citizens".(130)

Before he issued that Executive Order, "each agency was required to have a regulatory policy officer . . . [who] may have been either a career governmental official or a political appointee and had to report to the agency head.  Now, that officer must be a political appointee separate from the agency head, and the officer no longer must report to the agency head but reports directly to the White House."  Such actions undercut congressional authority and oversight that had been previously "delegated to agency heads, who are accountable to both Congress and the president . . ."(130)

"Not only is Bush trying to clamp down on health and safety agencies, but he is also nominating an anti-regulatory extremist to oversee the regulatory process . . . [as he] continues to push Susan Dudley - who was director of regulatory studies at the industry-funded think tank Mercatus Center and is hostile to the federal regulatory process . . . to head the OMB agency in charge of regulations (the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, or OIRA)."(130)

"As OIRA head, Dudley has the power to weaken or eliminate regulations that protect your health and your rights - from environmental protections to privacy protections.  And, judging from her record and her ties to regulated industry, she will try to block most new protections."(130)

Fox

"Bush has also nominated Michael E. Baroody, executive vice president of the National Association of Manufacturers [NAM], to be chair of the Consumer Product Safety Commission [CPSC], which regulates many of the association's members . . . "(130)

"President Bush has made a stunningly inappropriate choice in nominating Michael Baroody . . . [who helped] to weaken the sharpest enforcement tool in its [CPSC] arsenal – a safeguard that requires companies to disclose hazardous products – showing that a clear conflict-of-interest afflicts Baroody's nomination."(131)

"NAM's motive for weakening the safeguards? Money. An analysis by Public Citizen shows that the rule has netted more than 80 percent of the agency's fines since 1997 – and NAM members and affiliates have accounted for more than half of those payments. The new guidance, which was finally issued in July 2006, will allow future manufacturing defects and safety hazards to go unreported if a manufacturer determines that they meet any of several newly created exceptions. The guidance will undoubtedly save companies money and reduce public notice of safety risks. If confirmed, Baroody would administer the safeguards that NAM helped to changepresenting a clear conflict-of-interest."(131)

And that's how they do it!

Get your cronies on the inside and have them subvert all the rules, regulations and guidance mechanisms to facilitate your corporate buddies.

To get into the 'nitty gritty' on just how the White House despot has undermined our safety, read this article: Regulatory Underkill: The Bush Administration's Insidious Dismantling of Public Health and Environmental Protections. It reveals the devious, surreptitious under-regulation and deliberate lack of regulatory enforcement that has been hidden from public scrutiny, even as the Bush administration perniciously continues to deliberately undermine our regulatory laws.(132)

Why destroy our protective administrative laws?

Because that's EXACTLY how they successfully created the EU. They found that by 'harmonizing' the all the various European countries' massive, centuries old, bureaucratic legal system, they could surreptitiously pervert those regulations for their own purposes. Once you grasp that, you will understand just how they are now secretly working, behind the scenes, to create the NAU by using similar methodologies using incremental stealth by harmonizations of our regulatory laws -- to commit their treason.


The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men. ~ Plato

Once we are in the same position as Britain and the other European nations are today, it will be too late to stop the North American Union. By then, the One World Monopolists will have already moved on to combining the NAU with South America in order to create the Americas Union, the AU.

What shall we do? Author Greg Evensen asks YOU this question . . .

'Will You Stand, Fight, Hide or Surrender?'(133)



It is inevitable that some defeat will enter even the most victorious life. The human spirit is never finished when it is defeated. It is finished when it surrenders. ~ Ben Stein


Note 1:  All bracketed [ ] notations within the quotes, are added for clarification.
Note 2:  All underlining, color and italics, within the quotes and elsewhere, are done for emphasis.
Note 3:  Info on the Trilateral Commission and Council on Foreign Relations (CFR):  http://www.prolognet.qc.ca/clyde/cfr.html.

References
NOTE:
If a 'Reference' link does not work, you can do the following:
1. Copy the link
2. Go to the 'Wayback Machine' here (http://www.archive.org/web/web.php)
3. Paste the old link into the box at the top
4. Click the 'Take Me Back' button
5. Select one of the listings to the archived, original page
  1. Jerome R. Corsi, President Quietly Creating 'NAFTA Plus', May 24, 2006, Human Events Online, http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=15059.
  2. Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D., Treason Abounds ~ Gov't Cabal Plots North American Union (NAU), September 4, 2006, Updated March 1, 2007, StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com, http://www.StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com/TreasonAbounds.html.
  3. David Noakes, Transnational Regions - ArcManche, Accessed May 1, 2007, eutruth.org.uk, http://www.eutruth.org.uk/transnational.pdf.
  4. Dave Eberhart, U.S.-Mexico Pact Revealed:  Billions to Non Citizens, January 5, 2007, newsmax.com, http://www.newsmax.com/scripts/printer_friendly.pl?page=http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/1/4/174024.shtml?s=lh.
  5. Ms. V [for Vendetta] - Conspiracy - The UK Being Suppressed in the News, November 14, 2006, 40:31 Minutes, http://www.StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com/videos/UKSuppressedInNews.html#Title.
  6. BBC, In pictures:  The Queen Visits US, May 4, 2007, BBC News, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_pictures/6624437.stm.
  7. David Noakes, Do You Know The Truth About the EU?, Accessed April 7, 2007, eutruth.org.uk, http://eutruth.org.uk/ or this one http://drjn.co.uk/.
  8. Judi McLeod, S.O.S. to Rev. Ian Paisly, April 8, 2004, http://www.canadafreepress.com/2004/edesk040804.htm.
  9. Kirsten Grieshaber, Raids across Germany on G-8 Fears, May 9, 2007, Associated Press, http://revereradio.net/e107/news.php?item.305.15.  Alternate:  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/09/AR2007050900520.html.
  10. Gottsegnet.blogspot, Principled Discovery:  Melissa Busekros, April 5, 2007, gottsegnet.blogspot.com, http://gottsegnet.blogspot.com/2007/04/melissa-busekros-continued.html.
  11. Peter J. Smith, German Homeschooler Melissa Busekros Home with family after 3 Month Ordeal, April 23, 2007, lifesite.net, http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/apr/07042301.html.
  12. Bob Unruh, Police take home-taught student to psych ward:  Government objected to her parent-led courses in math, Latin, February 3, 2007, World Net Daily, http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54082.
  13. Strasbourg, Accessed May 1, 2007, wikipedia.org, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strasbourg.
  14. BBC News, US and EU agree 'single market', April 30, 2007, bbc.co.uk, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6607757.stm.
  15. U.S. Dept. of State, U.S., European Union To Expand Trans-Atlantic Investment Market, March 2007, uninfo.state.gov, http://usinfo.state.gov/xarchives/display.html?p=washfile-english&y=2007&m=March&x=20070327104627zjsredna0.6675989.
  16. BBC News, Limited hopes at US-EU summit, April 30, 2007, newsvote.bbc.co.uk, http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6607103.stm.
  17. Jerome R. Corsi, Bush OKs 'integration' with European Union, May 8, 2007, WorldNetDaily, http://wnd.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55584.
  18. White House Press Secretary, Framework for Advancing Transatlantic Economic Integration Between the United States of America and the European Union, April 30, 2007, whitehouse.gov, http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/04/20070430-4.html.
  19. White House Press Secretary, President Bush Meets with EU Leaders, Chancellor Merkel of the Federal Republic of Germany and President Barroso of the European Council and President of the European Commission, April 30, 2007, whitehouse.gov, http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/04/20070430-2.html.
  20. Lectlaw.com, habeas corpus:  Defined and Explained, Accessed October 26, 2006, lectlaw.com, http://www.lectlaw.com/def/h001.htm.
  21. GovTrack, S. 3930 [109th]:  Military Commission Act of 2006, Accessed April 3, 2007, govtrack.us, http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s109-3930.
  22. Joe Wolverton II, J.D., Are YOU the Enemy?, October 30, 2006, The New American, http://www.jbs.org/node/1782.
  23. Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Military Commissions Act of 2006, Accessed November 14, 2006, cfr.org, http://www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/military%20act.pdf.
  24. Michael G. Leventhal, 1878 Military Law Gets New Attention, November 21, 2001, dojgov.net, http://www.dojgov.net/posse_comitatus_act.htm.
  25. Frank Morales, Bush Moves Toward Martial Law, October 27, 2006, rinf.com, http://www.rinf.com/columnists/news/bush-moves-toward-martial-law.
  26. National Institute of Justice, Technology Transfer from defense:  Concealed Weapons Detection, National Institute of Justice Journal, No 229, August, 1995, pp.42-43.
  27. William Norman Grigg, Death Squad in Delaware:  The Case of the Murdered Marine, March 29, 2007, Lew Rockwell, http://www.lewrockwell.com/grigg/grigg-w10.html.
  28. FBI Brochure, Do You Support the Constitution? You're a Terrorist Suspect!, Accessed April 30, 2007, whatreallyhappened.com, http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/FBIsuspect.html.
  29. Florida4Marriage, The lawsuit with photos, Accessed May 14, 2007, Florida4Marriage.org, http://209.151.145.52/uploadfile/upload/%20Complaint%20-%20041907.pdf.
  30. Florida4Marriage, The story in pictures, Accessed May 14, 2007, Florida4Marriage.org, http://www.flfamily.org/photo_gallery.php?categoryid=9&catname=Police%20Harass%20Marriage%20Petition%20Collectors%20in%20Sunrise,%20FL.
  31. Florida4Marriage, Home Page, Accessed May 14, 2007, Florida4Marriage.org, http://www.florida4marriage.org/.
  32. Associated Press, VA nurse's letter to newspaper prompts sedition probe, February 8, 2006, firstamendmentscenter.org, http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=16438.
  33. Laura Parker, FEMA critic's shirt gets him tangled up in ticket, March 3, 2006, infowars.com, http://www.infowars.com/articles/new_orleans/fema_critic_shirt_gets_ticket.htm.
  34. Ronald Blocker, Memo to The School Board of Orange County , Florida , and Copy of Jan Hall's Letter, http://www.local6.com/download/2005/0825/4896076.pdf.
  35. local6.com, Orange County School Board Rejects Hall's Resignation, September 14, 2005, local6.com, http://www.local6.com/print/4970614/detail.html.
  36. Jim Kouri, Oregon State Trooper Suspends First Amendment, January 16, 2007, News With Views, http://www.newswithviews.com/BreakingNews/breaking49.htm.
  37. World Net Daily, Judge drops all charges against Philly Christians:  Adults who evangelized at homosexual event vindicated, teen girl likely off hook tomorrow, February 17, 2005, wnd.com, http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42905.
  38. World Net Daily, 'Philadelphia 11' fighting back:  Christians arrested, charged after protesting at homosexual event, December 1, 2004, wnd.com, http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=41705.
  39. World Net Daily, Christians arrested at homosexual event:  Demonstrators spend 21 hours in jail, charges with felonies, October 15, 2004, wnd.com, http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=40929.
  40. Ron Strom, 'Philadelphia 5' arrest like 'Christian Rodney King':  Documentary producer happened to be filming protesters day of 'gay' event, January 12, 2005, wnd.com, http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42337.
  41. Bob Unruh, Christians in bull's-eye new 'hate crimes' plan:  Congress working to create penalties for non-PC views, April 26, 2007, wnd.com, http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55392.
  42. Ron Paul, Unconstitutional Legislation Threatens Freedoms, May 7, 2007, house.gov, http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2007/tst050707.htm.
  43. CBS News, 'Three Amigos' Pledge Cooperation, March 24, 2005 , cbsnews.com, http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/03/23/politics/main682570.shtml.
  44. White House, President Meets with President Fox and Prime Minister Martin, March 28, 2005 , whitehouse.gov, http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/03/20050323-5.html.
  45. State Department, North American Leaders Unveil Security and Prosperity Partnership:  Bush, Fox, Martin outline trilateral efforts during March 23 meeting, March 23, 2005 , http://usinfo.state.gov/is/Archive/2005/Mar/23-209281.html.
  46. White House Press Release:  The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America:  Next Steps, March 31, 2006, http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/03/20060331-1.html. Note:  The spp.gov version is a reprint of the above press release which is what the government claims is our notification about SPP:  http://www.spp.gov/pdf/security_and_prosperity_partnership_of_north_america_fact_sheet.pdf.
  47. North American Competitiveness Council (NACC), Enhancing Competitiveness In Canada, Mexico, and the United States:  Private-Sector Priorities For the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), February 2007, pg. 59 for the list of US Corporations, (N=63), http://www.ceocouncil.ca/publications/pdf/test_4d5f2a8ae89332894118d2f53176d82b/NACC_Report_to_Ministers_February_23_2007.pdf.
  48. Council of the Americas, NACC Members, Accessed May 5, 2007, counciloftheamericas.org, http://counciloftheamericas.org/coa/NACC/04%20NACC%20Members.pdf.
  49. Canadian Council of Chief Executives, National and Global Perspectives - Autumn 2006, Accessed May 5, 2007, (pg. 18) ceocouncil.ca, http://www.ceocouncil.ca/publications/pdf/test_471d6b692d9770dfeab710f0c846405b/Perspectives_Autumn_Automne_2006.pdf.
  50. David Stewart-Patterson, Shaping a More competitive North America to Help Canadians Take on the World, April 26, 2007, Canadian Council of Chief Executives, http://www.ceocouncil.ca/en/view/?document_id=560&area_id=7.
  51. Judicial Watch, Judicial Watch Uncovers 2005 Chertoff Implementation Memo on Security and Prosperity Partnership:  ". . . ongoing action and reporting in the various . . . working groups led by DHS should now [be] driven by a single agenda:  the SPP.", March 20, 2007, judicialwatch.org, http://www.judicialwatch.org/6216.shtml.
  52. Michael Chertoff, Implementation of the Security and Prosperity Partnership, September 22, 2005 (pg. 7), Department of Homeland Security, http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive/2007/dhs06-880reSPP14Mar07_001.pdf.
  53. Niki Raapano, US Law In The Balance, April 28, 2007, New With Views, http://www.newswithviews.com/Raapana/niki14.htm.
  54. Americas Society, North American Competitiveness Council (NACC), Accessed May 5, 2007, americas-society.org, http://www.americas-society.org/coa/NACC/indexNACC.html.
  55. Jerome R. Corsi, Commerce chief pushes for 'North American integration':  Communiqué shows SPP far more than just 'dialogue' with Canada, Mexico, March 24, 2007, wnd.com, http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54857.
  56. Jerome Corsi, Food supplements targeted by trilateral deal:  Mexico put in charge as U.S., Canada agree to follow, April 4, 2007, World Net Daily, http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55028.
  57. Kevin P. Miller, We Become Silent:  The Last Days of Health Freedom, April 6, 2006, Well TV, http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=451097355502728465&q=We+Become+Silent.
  58. Philip F. Harris, Is It Safe To Eat?, May 9, 2007, American Chronicle, http://ww.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=26686.
  59. Joseph Farah, North America activists plotted 'stealth' strategy:  Detail of secret Banff meeting release as part of FOIA request, January 20, 2007, World Net Daily, http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54004.
  60. Council of Canadians, Backgrounder:  The North American Future 2025 Project, Accessed 4/25/2007, canadians.org, http://www.canadians.org/water/documents/NA_Future_2025_backgrounder.pdf.
  61. Armand B. Peschard-Sverdrup, North American Future 2025 Project, pp. 2, 3, 17, 18, Accessed April 25, 2007, Canadians.org, http://www.canadians.org/water/documents/NA_Future_2025.pdf.
  62. Kelly Patterson, Debate to heat up over North American water trade, April 12, 2007, CanWest News Service, http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=8106bcff-ffdf-4265-ad11-4fb08f83e1b6&k=0.
  63. Robert A. Pastor, Invited Testimony of Dr. Robert A. Pastor Before the Standing Committee of Foreign Affairs and International Trade - House of Commons - Government of Canada, February 7, 2002, american.edu, http://www.american.edu/ia/cnas/pdfs/PastorTestimonyCanada.pdf.
  64. Robert A. Pastor, Testimony Invited by the U.S. House of Representatives International Relations Committee -- Subcommittee on Western Hemisphere Affairs, U.S. Policy toward the Western Hemisphere:  Challenges and Opportunities, October 21, 2003, http://www.american.edu/ia/cdem/pdfs/PastorTestimonyHIRC.pdf.
  65. Robert A. Pastor, Testimony Invited by the Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere - U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, A North American Community Approach to Security, June 9, 2005, senate.gov, http://www.american.edu/ia/cnas/pdfs/pastor_testimony_june92005.pdf.
  66. Robert A. Pastor, Testimony Invited by the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on International Relations Subcommittee on Western Hemisphere Affairs, The U.S., Mexico and North America, April 26, 2006, american.edu, http://www.american.edu/ia/cnas/pdfs/testimony_pastor_april262007.pdf.
  67. Photograph:  John F. McManus, A Snapshot of CFR Dominance, February 6, 2006, The New American.
  68. Council on Foreign Relations, Building a North American Community:  Report of the Independent Task Force on the Future of North America, (pp. 1and 34 document numbering or pp. 11 and 46 .pdf numbering), May 27, 2005, cfr.org, http://www.american.edu/ia/cnas/pdfs/bnac_taskforce.pdf.
  69. Daniel Hannan, It's full steam ahead for EU constitution, even after 'No' votes, July 17, 2005, telegraph.co.uk, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/07/17/whan17.xml&sSheet=/news/2005/07/17.
  70. Associated Press, European leaders sign EU constitution, October 29, 2004, chinadaily.com, http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2004-10/29/content_386988.htm.
  71. Reuters, UK's Blair says no European constitution needed, April 16, 2007, reuters.com, http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSL1616134820070416.
  72. Filipe Rufino, MEPs back Berlin declaration deal, March 28, 2007, The Parliament.com, http://www.eupolitix.com/EN/News/200703/d65fabd3-439d-4467-adbc-17e109193a64.htm.
  73. Lisa J. Adams, U.S. Says Mexico Truck Program on Track, May 9, 2007, American Chronicle, http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=26640.
  74. Security and Prosperity Partnership, SPP Myths vs. Facts, Accessed April 22, 2007, spp.gov, http://www.spp.gov/myths_vs_facts.asp.
  75. Paul Martin, International Policy At A Crossroads:  Foreword From The Prime Minister ~ Making a Difference, Accessed April 22, 2007, geo.international.gc.ca, http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/cip-pic/ips/ips-overview2-en.asp.
  76. Steven Yates, Ben Bernanke & The New International Economic Order, September 11, 2006, NewWithViews.com, http://www.newswithviews.com/Yates/steven22.htm.
  77. Barry M. Goldwater, With No Apologies:  The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater, 1979, Published by Morrow.
  78. William Blase, The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the New World Order, 1995, conspiracyarchive.com, http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Council_Foreign_Relations.htm.
  79. Richard N. Gardner, The Hard Road to World Order, April 1974, Foreign Affairs, vol. 52, No. 3, pg. 558 (a pay .pdf document), http://www.foreignaffairs.org/19740401faessay10106/Richard-n-gardner/the-hard-road-to-world-order.html.
  80. U.S. Department of State, Joint Statement by Ministers Responsible for the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, February 23, 2007, state.gov, http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2007/february/81033.htm.
  81. Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D., Constitutional Lawyers . . . Where Are You?, Updated January 20, 2007, StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com, http://www.StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com/ViolationsOfLaw.html.
  82. Jeff Rense, John Swinton - Yes, He Said It, But . . . , March 8, 2002, rense.com, http://www.rense.com/general20/yes.htm.
    Original Source: Richard O. Boyer and Herbert M. Morais, Labor's Untold Story, Publisher: United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America, NY, 1955/1979.
  83. Walter Burien, They Spoke The Truth About The Lapdog Media . . . , February 25, 2005, rense.com, http://www.rense.com/general63/spoke.htm.
    Original source: Congressional Record of 1917, page 2949.
  84. Stanley Monteith, M.D., Radio Liberty - March 1999 Newsletter, Accessed May 18, 2007, radioliberty.com, http://www.radioliberty.com/nlmar99.htm.
  85. John Pilger, John Pilger addresses Columbia University in New York, April 14, 2007, johnpilger.com, http://www.johnpilger.com/page.asp?partid=267.
  86. Associated Press, Toll Road Giant Buys Newspapers to Silence Critics:  Critics charge that the Macquarie purchase of American Consolidated Media is designed to silence critics of a Texas toll road project, January 26, 2007, thenewspaper.com, http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/15/1570.asp.
  87. This is London, Everyone Must Love The EU . . . Says Tony Blair, February 12, 2006, thisislondon.co.uk, http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23376768-details/Everyone+must+love+the+EU...+says+Tony+Blair/article.do.
  88. Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider, The First Global Revolution:  A Report by the council of The Club of Rome, pp. 115, Published by Pantheon Books, a division of Random House, Inc., New York, and simultaneously in Canada by Random House of Canada Limited, Toronto.
  89. Daniel Taylor, Global warming hysteria serves as excuse for world government:, March 12, 2007, oldthinkernews.com, http://oldthinkernews.com/Articles/oldthinker%20news/global_warming_hysteria_serves_a.htm.
  90. Economy In Crisis, America Today - Dangerously Vulnerable, November 17, 2006, economyincrisis.org, http://www.economyincrisis.org/articles/show/1045.
  91. Jerome R. Corsi, North American Union leader says merger just crisis away:  Leading intellectual force behind effort toward EU-style unity looks at future, December 15,2006, World Net Daily, http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53378.
  92. John O. Edwards, Gen. Franks Doubts Constitution Will Survive WMD Attack, November 21, 2003, NewMax.com, http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/11/20/185048.shtml.
  93. London Observer, British handing out 'secret' awards, June 19, 2006 (Page 6), taipeitimes.com, http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/world/archives/2006/06/19/2003314439.
  94. Daily Mail, Blair:  UK will lead the world in Climate change fight, March 13, 2007, dailymail.co.uk, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=441953&in_page_id=1770&ct=5.
  95. James Chapman, Warning to homeowners as the green vision is unveiled, March 14, 2007, dailymail.co.uk, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=442150&in_page_id=1770.
  96. Nicholas Cecil, Power Lines Link to Cancer in New Alert, April 20, 2007, thisislondon.co.uk, http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23393290-details/Power+lines+link+to+cancer+in+new+alert/article.do.
  97. Labour.org, Gordon Brown calls for 'new world order' to tackle climate change, March 13, 2007, labour.org.uk, http://www.labour.org.uk/index.php?id=news2005&ux_news[id]=gbclimatechangegreen&cHash=84c971c453.
  98. Brown wants 'new world order' to fight global warming, March 12, 2007, oldthinkernews.com, http://oldthinkernews.com/Articles/brown_wants_new_world_order.htm.
  99. G. Edward Griffin, Scores of Top Scientists Expose the Global Warming Myth, March 19, 2007, Freedom Force International, http://freedom-force.org/freedomcontent.cfm?fuseaction=Chan4_global_warming&refpage=issues.
  100. Tom Harper, Scientists threatened for 'climate denial', March 11, 2007, Sunday Telegraphy, http://lib.store.yahoo.net/lib/realityzone/UFNclimatedenial.htm.
  101. Richard N. Haass, Prepared Statement before the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming U.S. House of Representatives, April 18, 2007, cfr.org, http://www.cfr.org/publication/13128/.
  102. Richard Haass, State sovereignty must be altered in globalized era:  In the age of globalization, states should give up some sovereignty to world bodies in order to protect their own interests, February 21, 2006, pg. 9, Taipei Times, http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2006/02/21/2003294021.
  103. Sara Kugler, World Mayors Hold Climate Summit in NYC, May 15, 2007, American Chronicle, http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=27227.
  104. Sara Kugler, Cities to Go Green Under Clinton Plan, May 16, 2007, American Chronicle, http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=27301.
  105. James P. Tucker, Jr., Globalists Gather In Brussels:  List of Attendees Copped by AFP; Trilats Push for Higher Gas Taxes, April 2, 2007, americanfreepress.net, http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/globalists_gather.html.
  106. Brussels, Belgium Newswire, Deep Pockets Needed for Climate Change Adaptation, April 9, 2007, ens-newswire.com, http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/apr2007/2007-04-09-01.asp.
  107. Joseph Watson, Globalists Love Global Warming:  Trilateral Commission, chairman of British Petroleum, CFR, Club of Rome fan hysteria to achieve world government, March 28, 2007, infowars.com, http://www.infowars.com/articles/nwo/globalists_love_global_warming.htm.
  108. Berit Kjos, Green Lies and Amazing Truths, April 20, 2007, crossroad.to, http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/007/earth-day.htm.
  109. Somebigguy, Global Warming Hysteria to Further North American Union?, April 9, 2007, vivelecanda.ca, http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php/20070408135904324.
  110. Jim Abrams, Senate Defeats Climate Change Measure, May 16, 2007, American Chronicle, http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=27298.
  111. Angela Charlton, France Elects Nicolas Sarkozy President, May 7, 2007, American Chronicle, http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=26447.
  112. Bryan Bender, Bill ties climate to national security:  Seeks assessments by CIA, Pentagon, April 9, 2007, The Boston Globe, http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2007/04/09/bill_ties_climate_to_national_security/.
  113. Jesse Helms, Excerpts From Senator Jesse Helms' Speech Before the Senate, on 15 December, 1987, Warning Against The New World Order, Accessed April 8, 2007, greenapple.com, http://www.greenapple.com/~ricfinke/NWO.html.
  114. B. Paulus, Privatization of the U.S. Highway System, December 18, 2006, naftasuperhighway.info, http://www.naftasuperhighway.info/SuperhighwaySpecialUpdate.html.
  115. Daniel Schulman and James Ridgeway, The Highwaymen, January/February 2007, MotherJones.com, http://www.motherjones.com//news/feature/2007/01/highwaymen.html.
  116. Jerome R. Corsi, U.S. infrastructure for sale to foreigners:  State, local officials gathering for seminar to learn 'how to', January 5, 2007, WorldNetDaily, http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53639.
  117. Tara Lohan, Fighting the Corporate Theft of Our Water, April 25, 2007, AlterNet, http://www.alternet.org/environment/50994.  Alternate:  http://www.alternet.org/story/50994/
  118. Accuracy In Media, The Coming North American Parliament, February 16, 2007, Accuracy In Media, http://www.aim.org/aim_report/5319_0_4_0_C.
  119. Deanna Spingola, The One World Order:  The Military Minions, August 17, 2006, NewsWithViews.com, http://www.newswithviews.com/Spingola/deanna48.htm.
  120. Allen L. Roland, Rex 84:  FEMA's Blueprint for Martial Law in America, August 20, 2006, globalresearch.ca, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=ROL20060820&articleId=3010.
  121. Joachim Bamrud, Beyond NAFTA, Accessed July 16, 2006, latinbusinesschronicle.com, http://www.latinbusinesschronicle.com/app/article.aspx?id=247.
  122. Robert A. Pastor, A North American Community:  A Modest Proposal To the Trilateral Commission -- Toronto, Ontario, Canada, November 1-2, 2002, american.edu, http://www.american.edu/internationalaffairs/cnas/PastorTrilateral.pdf.
  123. Mike Blair, Mugabe's Zimbabwe Sinks to New Lows, May 22, 2006, americanfreepress.net, http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/mugabe_s_zimbabwe_sinks.html.
  124. Gemma Meyer, The Coming Darkness:  A Warning for Americans:  A message from South Africa, March 20, 2004, rhodesian.server101, http://www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com/GemmaMeyer.html.
  125. Stop The NAU, 18 States Can't Be Wrong, Accessed May 7, 2007, stopthenau.org, http://www.stopthenau.org.
  126. John Birch Society, Update on the Status of the Anti-NAU Resolutions in 18 State Legislatures, Accessed May 16, 2007, jbs.org, http://www.jbs.org/node/3430.
  127. Chris Cobb, Committee of MPs to study secret 'Three Amigos' scheme, April 26, 2007, vivelecanada.ca, http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php/20070428035244734.
  128. Kelly Patterson, Tories storm out of meeting on sharing energy with U.S., May 11, 2007, canada.com, http://www.canada.com/topics/news/politics/story.html?id=f50ef203-38f7-4714-bde6-313b33ad834b&k=54273.
  129. Original source:  Connie Fogal, Connie Fogal On The Corporate North American Union, April 13, 2007, Google.com, http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-1355300745194023737.
  130. Jan Claybrook, Bush Steps Up His Attack on the Regulatory System, Endangering Important Health and Safety Protections, March/April 2007, Public Citizen, http://www.citizen.org/prezview/articles.cfm?ID=16305.
  131. Public Citizen, Baroody at NAM When It Backed Change in CPSC Rules to Conceal Dangerous Products, Accessed May 10, 2007, Public Citizen, http://www.citizen.org/congress/govtaccount/articles.cfm?ID=16542.
  132. William Buzbee, Robert Glicksman, Sidney Shapiro and Karen Sokol, Regulatory Underkill:  The Bush Administration's Insidious Dismantling of Public Health and Environmental Protections, October 2004, CPR White Paper #406, http://www.progressiveregulation.org/articles/Underkill_503.pdf.
  133. Greg Evensen, So.... Will You Stand, Fight, Hide or Surrender?, April 20, 2007, NewsWithViews.com, http://www.newswithviews.com/Evensen/greg10.htm.
Copyright © Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D., 2009, All Rights Reserved

Back